Electronic dental record use and clinical information management patterns among practitioner-investigators in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

BACKGROUND The growing availability of electronic data offers practitioners increased opportunities for reusing clinical data for research and quality improvement. However, relatively little is known about what clinical data practitioners keep on their computers regarding patients. METHODS The authors conducted a web-based survey of 991 U.S. and Scandinavian practitioner-investigators (P-Is) in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network to determine the extent of their use of computers to manage clinical information; the type of patient information they kept on paper, a computer or both; and their willingness to reuse electronic dental record (EDR) data for research. RESULTS A total of 729 (73.6 percent) of 991 P-Is responded.A total of 73.8 percent of U.S. solo practitioners and 78.7 percent of group practitioners used a computer to manage some patient information, and 14.3 percent and 15.9 percent, respectively, managed all patient information on a computer. U.S. practitioners stored appointments, treatment plans, completed treatment and images electronically most frequently, and the periodontal charting, diagnosis, medical history, progress notes and the chief complaint least frequently.More than 90 percent of Scandinavian practitioners stored all information electronically.A total of 50.8 percent of all P-Is were willing to reuse EDR data for research, and 63.1 percent preferred electronic forms for data collection. CONCLUSION The results of this study show that the trend toward increased adoption of EDRs in the United States is continuing, potentially making more data in electronic form available for research. Participants appear to be willing to reuse EDR data for research and to collect data electronically. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The rising rates of EDR adoption may offer increased opportunities for reusing electronic data for quality improvement and research.

[1]  Wilson D. Pace,et al.  Electronic Data Collection Options for Practice-Based Research Networks , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[2]  D Brad Rindal,et al.  The creation and development of the dental practice-based research network. , 2008, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[3]  Stuart Speedie,et al.  The Electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN): a new era in practice-based research. , 2006, Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM.

[4]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Routinely collected general practice data: goldmines for research? A report of the European Federation for Medical Informatics Primary Care Informatics Working Group (EFMI PCIWG) from MIE2006, Maastricht, The Netherlands. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[5]  Lars-Erik Strender,et al.  Collection and retrieval of structured clinical data from electronic patient records in general practice A first-phase study to create a health care database for research and quality assessment , 2004, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[6]  Heiko Spallek,et al.  Clinical computing in general dentistry. , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[7]  J. Richman,et al.  Lessons learned during the conduct of clinical studies in the dental PBRN. , 2011, Journal of dental education.

[8]  K. Thiru,et al.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Mark B Stephens,et al.  A Novel Approach Using an Electronic Medical Record to Identify Children and Adolescents at Risk for Dyslipidemia: A Study from the Primary Care Education and Research Learning (PEARL) Network , 2008, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[10]  J. Richman,et al.  Dentists in practice-based research networks have much in common with dentists at large: evidence from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. , 2009, General dentistry.

[11]  Elizabeth W. Staton,et al.  An Electronic Practice-Based Network for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  P. Major,et al.  Computer and Internet usage by Canadian dentists. , 2006, Journal.

[13]  Peter Sandercock,et al.  Sensible approaches for reducing clinical trial costs , 2008, Clinical trials.

[14]  Kitty S. Chan,et al.  Review: Electronic Health Records and the Reliability and Validity of Quality Measures: A Review of the Literature , 2010, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[15]  J. Richman,et al.  Practices participating in a dental PBRN have substantial and advantageous diversity even though as a group they have much in common with dentists at large , 2009, BMC oral health.

[16]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection process in clinical trials: costs simulation study. , 2009, Contemporary clinical trials.

[17]  Jian Hu,et al.  Case Report: Are Chinese Dentists Ready for the Computerization of Dentistry? A Population Investigation of China's Metropolises , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  D. Richards,et al.  Questionnaire survey on the use of computerisation in dental practices across the Thames Valley region , 2003, British Dental Journal.

[19]  Abel Kho,et al.  Information Technology in PBRNs: The Indiana University Medical Group Research Network (IUMG ResNet) Experience , 2007, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[20]  R. Werneck,et al.  The use of administrative databases to assess oral health care. , 2005, Journal of public health dentistry.

[21]  Titus Schleyer.  Collecting research data from clinical practice: How can informatics help? , 2009 .