Origin and evolution of the slime molds (Mycetozoa)

The Mycetozoa include the cellular (dictyostelid), acellular (myxogastrid), and protostelid slime molds. However, available molecular data are in disagreement on both the monophyly and phylogenetic position of the group. Ribosomal RNA trees show the myxogastrid and dictyostelid slime molds as unrelated early branching lineages, but actin and beta-tubulin trees place them together as a single coherent (monophyletic) group, closely related to the animal-fungal clade. We have sequenced the elongation factor-1alpha genes from one member of each division of the Mycetozoa, including Dictyostelium discoideum, for which cDNA sequences were previously available. Phylogenetic analyses of these sequences strongly support a monophyletic Mycetozoa, with the myxogastrid and dictyostelid slime molds most closely related to each other. All phylogenetic methods used also place this coherent Mycetozoan assemblage as emerging among the multicellular eukaryotes, tentatively supported as more closely related to animals + fungi than are green plants. With our data there are now three proteins that consistently support a monophyletic Mycetozoa and at least four that place these taxa within the "crown" of the eukaryote tree. We suggest that ribosomal RNA data should be more closely examined with regard to these questions, and we emphasize the importance of developing multiple sequence data sets.

[1]  J. Palmer,et al.  Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  H Philippe,et al.  Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. , 1993, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[3]  L. A. Glover,et al.  Retrotransposon-like nature of Tp1 elements: implications for the organisation of highly repetitive, hypermethylated DNA in the genome of Physarum polycephalum. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  J. Barnabas,et al.  Interrelationships among major protistan groups based on a parsimony network of 5S rRNA sequences. , 1990, Bio Systems.

[5]  G. H. Coombs,et al.  Evolutionary relationships among protozoa. , 1998 .

[6]  E. N. Adams.  Consensus Techniques and the Comparison of Taxonomic Trees , 1972 .

[7]  A. Kuspa,et al.  Physical mapping of genes to specific chromosomes in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1992, Genomics.

[8]  政美 長谷川,et al.  Molphy, programs for molecular phylogenetics, I : protml, maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny , 1992 .

[9]  J. Adachi,et al.  MOLPHY, programs for molecular phylogenetics , 1992 .

[10]  R. Kay.  Differentiation and patterning in Dictyostelium. , 1994, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[11]  H. Klenk,et al.  Location of Protist Lineages in a Phylogenetic Tree Inferred from Sequences of DNA-dependent RNA Polymerases , 1995 .

[12]  S. Katiyar,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of β-Tubulin Sequences from Amitochondrial Protozoa , 1996 .

[13]  D. Hibbett,et al.  Evolutionary relationships within the fungi: analyses of nuclear small subunit rRNA sequences. , 1992, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[14]  J. Ehlting,et al.  Actin coding regions: gene family evolution and use as a phylogenetic marker , 1995 .

[15]  L. S. Olive,et al.  Two New Members of the Acrasiales , 1960 .

[16]  H. Philippe,et al.  Structural and functional properties of thesaurin a (42Sp50), the major protein of the 42 S particles present in Xenopus laevis previtellogenic oocytes. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  R. Whittaker.  New concepts of kingdoms of organisms , 1969 .

[18]  J. Bull,et al.  An Empirical Test of Bootstrapping as a Method for Assessing Confidence in Phylogenetic Analysis , 1993 .

[19]  G. Hinkle,et al.  The Evolution of the Vahlkampfiidae as Deduced from 16S‐like Ribosomal RNA Analysis , 1993, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[20]  Goode Bl,et al.  Speedprep" purification of template for double-stranded DNA sequencing. , 1992 .

[21]  G. S. Sandhu,et al.  Rapid one-step characterization of recombinant vectors by direct analysis of transformed Escherichia coli colonies. , 1989, BioTechniques.

[22]  T G Burland,et al.  Patterns of inheritance, development and the mitotic cycle in the protist Physarum polycephalum. , 1993, Advances in microbial physiology.

[23]  J. Condeelis,et al.  Identification of an actin-binding protein from Dictyostelium as elongation factor 1a , 1990, Nature.

[24]  N. Satoh,et al.  Early evolution of the Metazoa and phylogenetic status of diploblasts as inferred from amino acid sequence of elongation factor-1 alpha. , 1996, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[25]  D. Hillis.  Inferring complex phytogenies , 1996, Nature.

[26]  J D Palmer,et al.  The root of the universal tree and the origin of eukaryotes based on elongation factor phylogeny. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Alpha-tubulin from early-diverging eukaryotic lineages and the evolution of the tubulin family. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  J. Felsenstein.  Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .

[29]  William R. Taylor,et al.  The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences , 1992, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[30]  Michael J Sanderson,et al.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: THE BOOTSTRAP REVISITED , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[31]  Michael W. Smith,et al.  Evidence for the Heterolobosea from Phylogenetic Analysis of Genes Encoding Glyceraldehyde‐3‐Phosphate Dehydrogenase , 1996, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.