Discursive ethics in ecosystems valuation and environmental policy

Abstract Discursive ethics has its origin in the Frankfurt School of critical theory. As an applied ethic it is also associated with practical philosophy. In this paper discursive ethics is discussed as a conceptual and practical framework for ecosystems valuation and environmental policy. The discussion focuses on three main strengths of discursive ethics: (1) it offers an integrated process for ecosystems valuation; (2) it offers a decision-making framework for responding to uncertainty and risk and the reality of action-in-indeterminacy; (3) it offers a process for deconstructing common valuation concepts and identifying conditions for their critical reconstruction. The theoretical discussion is followed by a case study example which illustrates the usefulness of discursive ethics in identifying valuation biases hidden behind disciplinary assumptions and conceptual norms. These include cultural norms of rationality, information biases which consider “hard facts” over “soft values”, and disciplinary valuation biases which distinguish between “hard” and “soft” expert contributions. As the case study illustrates, a successful application of discursive ethics in ecosystems valuation and environmental policy demands sensitivity to such underlying biases. Beyond its policy relevance discursive ethics may also offer a framework for an extended peer discourse through which new foci in research and education can be identified.

[1]  C. Green,et al.  Economics and the ‘greenhouse effect’ , 1992 .

[2]  W. Eberle,et al.  Critique of Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Methods for Valuing Natural Resources and Ecosystems , 1991 .

[3]  Allen W. Wood,et al.  Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory , 1986 .

[4]  V. Smith,et al.  Generalized travel cost model and water-quality benefits: a reconsideration , 1985 .

[5]  R. S. D. Motta Economics of natural resources and the environment , 1990 .

[6]  S. O’Hara Valuing socio‐diversity , 1995 .

[7]  T. Bowyer-Bower,et al.  Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development , 1989 .

[8]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  The Merger of Knowledge With Power: Essays in Critical Science , 1990 .

[9]  R. Howarth Sustainability, Uncertainty, and Intergenerational Fairness , 1998 .

[10]  Lynn White,et al.  The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis , 1967, Science.

[11]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Endangered Species and Uncertainty: The Economics of a Safe Minimum Standard , 1978 .

[12]  J. Browne Gyn/Ecology: the metaethics of radical feminism , 1981, Medical History.

[13]  B. English Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability , 1991 .

[14]  S. Griffin Woman and nature : the roaring inside her , 1980 .

[15]  R. Brightman The Journey Home , 1944, Nature.

[16]  K. Apel Transformation der Philosophie , 1973 .

[17]  M. Oelschlaeger Caring for Creation: An Ecumenical Approach to the Environmental Crisis , 1994 .

[18]  Frederick H. Buttel,et al.  Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. , 1987 .

[19]  S. Harding The science question in feminism , 1986 .

[20]  Nancy Wyatt,et al.  The Science Question in Feminism , 1990 .

[21]  Jean-Pierre Blanchet,et al.  Arctic ‘greenhouse effect’ , 1994, Nature.

[22]  S. O’Hara From production to sustainability: Considering the whole household , 1995 .

[23]  J. Llewelyn Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis , 1985 .

[24]  Susan Hekman,et al.  Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism , 1990 .

[25]  Richard B. Norgaard,et al.  Sustainability and discounting the future , 1991 .

[26]  J. Habermas Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln , 1983 .

[27]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[28]  Donald Ludwig Environmental Sustainability: Magic, Science, and Religion in Natural Resource Management. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[29]  J. Murdoch,et al.  Hedonic price estimation of variable urban air quality , 1988 .

[30]  G. Munda,et al.  Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environmental management , 1994 .

[31]  Ecology,Economics,Ethics The Broken Circle , 1992 .

[32]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[33]  Carolyn Merchant,et al.  The death of nature : women, ecology, and the scientific revolution , 1982 .

[34]  David S. Brookshire,et al.  Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches , 1982 .

[35]  K. Arrow,et al.  Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility , 1974 .

[36]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science , 1992 .

[37]  Charles C. Harris,et al.  Improving the contingent valuation method: A psychological perspective , 1989 .