Quantifying Global Tolerance of Biochemical Systems: Design Implications for Moiety-Transfer Cycles

Robustness of organisms is widely observed although difficult to precisely characterize. Performance can remain nearly constant within some neighborhood of the normal operating regime, leading to homeostasis, but then abruptly break down with pathological consequences beyond this neighborhood. Currently, there is no generic approach to identifying boundaries where local performance deteriorates abruptly, and this has hampered understanding of the molecular basis of biological robustness. Here we introduce a generic approach for characterizing boundaries between operational regimes based on the piecewise power-law representation of the system's components. This conceptual framework allows us to define “global tolerance” as the ratio between the normal value of a parameter and the value at such a boundary. We illustrate the utility of this concept for a class of moiety-transfer cycles, which is a widespread module in biology. Our results show a region of “best” local performance surrounded by “poor” regions; also, selection for improved local performance often pushes the operating values away from regime boundaries, thus increasing global tolerance. These predictions agree with experimental data from the reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) redox cycle of human erythrocytes.

[1]  P. Kuchel,et al.  Regulation of the human-erythrocyte hexose-monophosphate shunt under conditions of oxidative stress: a study using NMR spectroscopy, a kinetic isotope effect, a reconstituted system and computer simulation , 1985 .

[2]  S. Mangan,et al.  Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M. Savageau,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity as a Criterion for Evaluating and Comparing the Performance of Biochemical Systems , 1971, Nature.

[4]  Kirkman Hn,et al.  Regulation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. I. Intact red cells. , 1980 .

[5]  A. Salvador,et al.  Synergism analysis of biochemical systems. I. Conceptual framework. , 2000, Mathematical biosciences.

[6]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Mary J Dunlop,et al.  Multiple functions of a feed-forward-loop gene circuit. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  M. Wall,et al.  Design of gene circuits: lessons from bacteria , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  K. F. Tipton,et al.  Biochemical systems analysis: A study of function and design in molecular biology , 1978 .

[10]  L. Luzzatto,et al.  Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficient Red Cells: Resistance to Infection by Malarial Parasites , 1969, Science.

[11]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  A Quantitative Measure of Error Minimization in the Genetic Code , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[12]  Michael A Savageau,et al.  Quantitative evolutionary design of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase expression in human erythrocytes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. M. Alexander Factors of safety in the structure of animals. , 1981, Science progress.

[14]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Brian C. Goodwin,et al.  Theoretical Biology: Epigenetic and Evolutionary Order from Complex Systems , 1990 .

[16]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[17]  Michael A Savageau,et al.  Signalling network with a bistable hysteretic switch controls developmental activation of the σF transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robustness as a measure of plausibility in models of biochemical networks. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Bor-Sen Chen,et al.  A new measure of the robustness of biochemical networks , 2005, Bioinform..

[20]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[21]  R Heinrich,et al.  A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. Critique of the crossover theorem and a general procedure to identify interaction sites with an effector. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[22]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Design and Diversity in Bacterial Chemotaxis: A Comparative Study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , 2004, PLoS biology.

[23]  M A Savageau,et al.  Demand theory of gene regulation. I. Quantitative development of the theory. , 1998, Genetics.

[24]  Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al.  Specificity and robustness in transcription control networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[26]  Michael A. Savageau,et al.  Design principles for elementary gene circuits: Elements, methods, and examples. , 2001, Chaos.

[27]  M A Savageau,et al.  Feedfoward inhibition in biosynthetic pathways: inhibition of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by intermediates of the pathway. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  Ernest Beutler,et al.  Red Cell Metabolism: A Manual of Biochemical Methods , 1975 .

[29]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  J. F. Staples,et al.  Relationships between enzymatic flux capacities and metabolic flux rates: nonequilibrium reactions in muscle glycolysis. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M A Savageau,et al.  Irreversibility in unbranched pathways: preferred positions based on regulatory considerations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Michael A Savageau,et al.  Distinctive topologies of partner-switching signaling networks correlate with their physiological roles. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  A. Ninfa,et al.  Development of Genetic Circuitry Exhibiting Toggle Switch or Oscillatory Behavior in Escherichia coli , 2003, Cell.

[34]  E. C. Hodgman,et al.  A conceptual framework to guide nursing curriculum. , 1973, Nursing forum.

[35]  Uri Alon,et al.  Rules for biological regulation based on error minimization. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  A. Salvador,et al.  Synergism analysis of biochemical systems. II. Tensor formulation and treatment of stoichiometric constraints. , 2000, Mathematical biosciences.

[37]  E. Meléndez-Hevia,et al.  The game of the pentose phosphate cycle: a mathematical approach to study the optimization in design of metabolic pathways during evolution. , 1990, Biomedica biochimica acta.

[38]  M A Savageau,et al.  Effect of overall feedback inhibition in unbranched biosynthetic pathways. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[39]  M A Savageau,et al.  Subunit structure of regulator proteins influences the design of gene circuitry: analysis of perfectly coupled and completely uncoupled circuits. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Ewald R. Weibel,et al.  Symmorphosis: On Form and Function in Shaping Life , 2000 .

[41]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  H. Kacser,et al.  The control of flux. , 1995, Biochemical Society transactions.

[43]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  The Bacillus subtilis sin Operon , 2005, Genetics.

[44]  William S Hlavacek,et al.  Design principles for regulator gene expression in a repressible gene circuit. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  L. Hood,et al.  Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity , 2007 .

[46]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J E Mittenthal,et al.  A new method for assembling metabolic networks, with application to the Krebs citric acid cycle. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  P. Swain,et al.  Noisy information processing through transcriptional regulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Rui Alves,et al.  Comparative analysis of prototype two‐component systems with either bifunctional or monofunctional sensors: differences in molecular structure and physiological function , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[50]  Jared Diamond,et al.  Quantitative evolutionary design , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[51]  B. Palsson,et al.  The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Alexander Rm,et al.  Factors of safety in the structure of animals. , 1981 .

[53]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  Rules for coupled expression of regulator and effector genes in inducible circuits. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  Professor Herbert J. Fromm Ph. D. Initial Rate Enzyme Kinetics , 1975, Molecular Biology Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[55]  D J Worthington,et al.  Glutathione reductase from human erythrocytes. Catalytic properties and aggregation. , 1976, European journal of biochemistry.

[56]  David J. Worthington,et al.  Glutathione Reductase from Human Erythrocytes , 1976 .

[57]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. , 2003, Genome research.

[58]  Michael A Savageau,et al.  Evolution of enzymes in a series is driven by dissimilar functional demands , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  Van Valkenburg,et al.  Introduction to Modern Network Synthesis , 1960 .

[60]  M. Goulian,et al.  Robustness and the cycle of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in a two-component regulatory system , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.