Changes in presynaptic inhibition of Ia fibres at the onset of voluntary contraction in man.

1. Two independent methods were used, in man, to assess changes in presynaptic inhibition of I a terminals at the onset of selective voluntary contractions: (1) measurement of the amount of heteronymous monosynaptic I a facilitation (from the quadriceps muscle to soleus motoneurones) to provide an assessment of the amount of ongoing presynaptic inhibition exerted on the I a fibres responsible for the facilitation; (2) measurement of the inhibition of H reflexes 40‐60 ms after a short vibration to the tibialis anterior tendon to estimate the excitability of the interneurones mediating presynaptic inhibition from tibialis anterior I a afferents to the I a afferents of the test H reflex (soleus or quadriceps). 2. At the onset of an isolated voluntary plantar flexion of the foot (gastrocnemius‐soleus contraction) the heteronymous facilitation from quadriceps to soleus was increased, reflecting a decreased presynaptic inhibition of the quadriceps I a terminals on soleus motoneurones. Vibratory inhibition of the soleus H reflex was decreased, reflecting an inhibition of transmission of presynaptic inhibition to homonymous soleus I a afferent terminals. 3. At the onset of the same gastrocnemius‐soleus contraction there was, on the contrary, an increased vibratory inhibition of the quadriceps H reflex indicating a facilitation of transmission of presynaptic inhibition to homonymous quadriceps I a afferent terminals. 4. At the onset of an isolated voluntary knee extension (quadriceps contraction) the opposite pattern was seen: the heteronymous facilitation from quadriceps to soleus was decreased and the vibratory inhibition of a soleus H reflex was increased, whereas the vibratory inhibition of the quadriceps H reflex was decreased. 5. These results indicate that presynaptic inhibition of I a afferent terminals on motoneurones of contracting muscles is decreased, permitting I a activity to contribute to excitation of voluntarily activated motoneurones. On the contrary, presynaptic inhibition of I a fibres to motoneurones of muscles not involved in the contraction is increased. It is argued that the former must be supraspinal in origin. 6. It is concluded that the control of presynaptic inhibition of I a fibres at the onset of movement may be organized so as to aid in achieving selectivity of muscle activation, i.e. so as to increase motor contrast.

[1]  J. Eccles,et al.  Synaptic action during and after repetitive stimulation , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  J. Eccles,et al.  Central inhibitory action attributable to presynaptic depolarization produced by muscle afferent volleys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  W D Willis,et al.  Depolarization of central terminals of Group I afferent fibres from muscle , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  J. Eccles,et al.  DEPOLARIZATION OF CENTRAL TERMINALS OF GROUP Ib AFFERENT FIBERS OF MUSCLE , 1963 .

[5]  R. Eccles,et al.  Presynaptic inhibition evoked by muscle contraction , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  H. Táboříková,et al.  Conditioning of H-reflexes by a preceding subthreshold H-reflex stimulus. , 1969, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  L. Stark,et al.  Interactions between voluntary and postural mechanisms of thehuman motor system. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  B. Bussel,et al.  A comparison of H reflex at the onset of a voluntary movement or a polysynaptic reflex. , 1973, Brain research.

[9]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Discharges of single hindlimb afferents in the freely moving cat. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  P. Delwaide,et al.  Short-latency effects of low-threshold muscular afferent fibers on different motoneuronal pools of the lower limb in man , 1978, Experimental Neurology.

[11]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Somatosensory, proprioceptive, and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. , 1979, Physiological reviews.

[12]  V. Dietz,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of human locomotion. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  P. Ashby,et al.  Human motoneuron responses to group 1 volleys blocked presynaptically by vibration , 1980, Brain Research.

[14]  R. Katz,et al.  Reversal in cutaneous control of Ib pathways during human voluntary contraction , 1982, Brain Research.

[15]  L. Kempe.  Handbook of Physiology. Section I. The Nervous System , 1982 .

[16]  E. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  Comparison of soleus H reflex facilitation at the onset of soleus contractions produced voluntarily and during the stance phase of human gait , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  A Prochazka,et al.  Muscle afferent function and its significance for motor control mechanisms during voluntary movements in cat, monkey, and man. , 1983, Advances in neurology.

[18]  E. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  Descending control of reflex pathways in the production of voluntary isolated movements in man , 1983, Brain Research.

[19]  D. Rüegg,et al.  Relation between the specific H reflex facilitation preceding a voluntary movement and movement parameters in man. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J. Quintern,et al.  Corrective reactions to stumbling in man: Functional significance of spinal and transcortical reflexes , 1984, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  H. Hultborn,et al.  Evidence for presynaptic inhibition of muscle spindle Ia afferents in man , 1984, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  E. Pierrot‐Deseilligny.  Control of Human Locomotion by Group I Reflex Pathways from Ankle Extensors , 1985 .

[23]  J. Iles,et al.  Presynaptic inhibition of monosynaptic reflexes in the lower limbs of subjects with upper motoneuron disease. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[24]  H Hultborn,et al.  Assessing changes in presynaptic inhibition of I a fibres: a study in man and the cat. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.