Pyramidal approximation for power flow and optimal power flow

Power flow equations (PFEs) are the fundamental of power flow (PF) calculations and optimal PF (OPF) for power system analysis, but existing PFEs suffer from the trade-off among various requirements in practice. This study presents a novel pyramidal approximation (PA) for PF and OPF. A multi-sided pyramid is used to approximate the feasible region of PFEs. The PA-based PFEs not only guarantee the linearity, tightness, and no dependence on the initial guess but also have high solution accuracy. The rotation-and-fold strategy is developed to balance the computational efficiency and approximation accuracy, so that the problem for a relatively large power system can be solved in a reasonable time. Case studies in different test systems validate the tightness and accuracy of the proposed PA method. The balance of accuracy and efficiency is also discussed, and the PA has a good performance in the small or medium power systems.

[1]  Olaf Schenk,et al.  Two-Level Parallel Augmented Schur Complement Interior-Point Algorithms for the Solution of Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow Problems , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Wolfgang Utschick,et al.  hynet: An Optimal Power Flow Framework for Hybrid AC/DC Power Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Fei Hu,et al.  Comparisons on Kalman-Filter-Based Dynamic State Estimation Algorithms of Power Systems , 2020, IEEE Access.

[4]  Zhou Bo,et al.  Data-adaptive robust unit commitment in the hybrid AC/DC power system , 2019, Applied Energy.

[5]  Haibo He,et al.  Data-Adaptive Robust Optimization Method for the Economic Dispatch of Active Distribution Networks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[6]  Vaskar Sarkar,et al.  Accurate loss modelling in the DCOPF calculation for power markets via static piecewise linear loss approximation based upon line loading classification , 2019 .

[7]  Jinyu Wen,et al.  Stochastic Optimization of Economic Dispatch for Microgrid Based on Approximate Dynamic Programming , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  B. Venkatesh,et al.  Voltage stability constrained line‐wise optimal power flow , 2019, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution.

[9]  Jiakun Fang,et al.  Security constrained co-planning of transmission expansion and energy storage , 2019, Applied Energy.

[10]  Haibo He,et al.  Optimal Real-Time Operation Strategy for Microgrid: An ADP-Based Stochastic Nonlinear Optimization Approach , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[11]  WenChuan Wu,et al.  Recover Feasible Solutions for SOCP Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow Problems in Mesh Networks , 2017, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution.

[12]  Jun Deng,et al.  Parallel computing of multi-contingency optimal power flow with transient stability constraints , 2018 .

[13]  Masood Parvania,et al.  Contribution of FACTS devices in power systems security using MILP‐based OPF , 2018, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution.

[14]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Robust Security Constrained ACOPF via Conic Programming: Identifying the Worst Contingencies , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Miadreza Shafie-Khah,et al.  A Decentralized Renewable Generation Management and Demand Response in Power Distribution Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[16]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  A Linearized OPF Model With Reactive Power and Voltage Magnitude: A Pathway to Improve the MW-Only DC OPF , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Turaj Amraee,et al.  Mixed integer linear formulation for undervoltage load shedding to provide voltage stability , 2018 .

[18]  Guiping Zhu,et al.  Optimal unit commitment based on second-order cone programming in high wind power penetration scenarios , 2018 .

[19]  Olaf Schenk,et al.  Toward the Next Generation of Multiperiod Optimal Power Flow Solvers , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Shengwei Mei,et al.  Optimal Power Flow in Stand-Alone DC Microgrids , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Lingling Fan,et al.  Least Squares Estimation Based SDP Cuts for SOCP Relaxation of AC OPF , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[22]  M. Hadi Amini,et al.  Decomposition Methods for Distributed Optimal Power Flow: Panorama and Case Studies of the DC Model , 2018 .

[23]  Jiancheng Tan,et al.  Linear Inequalities Convex Transformation for Optimal Reactive Power Flow Model Based on MISOCP Relaxations , 2017 .

[24]  Mohammad Mardaneh,et al.  Moving beyond the optimal transmission switching: stochastic linearised SCUC for the integration of wind power generation and equipment failures uncertainties , 2017 .

[25]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  Solving OPF using linear approximations: fundamental analysis and numerical demonstration , 2017 .

[26]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  A State-Independent Linear Power Flow Model With Accurate Estimation of Voltage Magnitude , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  J. Boudec,et al.  AC OPF in radial distribution networks – Part I: On the limits of the branch flow convexification and the alternating direction method of multipliers , 2017 .

[28]  A. Bose,et al.  Optimal power flow based on successive linear approximation of power flow equations , 2016 .

[29]  Florin Capitanescu,et al.  Critical review of recent advances and further developments needed in AC optimal power flow , 2016 .

[30]  M. Bina,et al.  Linear approximated formulation of AC optimal power flow using binary discretisation , 2016 .

[31]  Nima Amjady,et al.  Solution of security constrained optimal power flow for large-scale power systems by convex transformation techniques and Taylor series , 2016 .

[32]  Jun Liu,et al.  Adaptive barrier filter-line-search interior point method for optimal power flow with FACTS devices , 2015 .

[33]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow—Part II: Exactness , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[34]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow—Part I: Formulations and Equivalence , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[35]  Hui Zhang,et al.  An improved network model for transmission expansion planning considering reactive power and network losses , 2013, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[36]  Mohammad Reza Hesamzadeh,et al.  Second-Order Cone Programming for Optimal Power Flow in VSC-Type AC-DC Grids , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[37]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Branch Flow Model: Relaxations and Convexification—Part II , 2012 .

[38]  S. Low,et al.  Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[39]  A. Diniz,et al.  A Dynamic Piecewise Linear Model for DC Transmission Losses in Optimal Scheduling Problems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[40]  Hsiao-Dong Chiang,et al.  Power-current hybrid rectangular formulation for interior-point optimal power flow , 2009 .

[41]  O. Alsaç,et al.  DC Power Flow Revisited , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[42]  R. Jabr,et al.  A Conic Quadratic Format for the Load Flow Equations of Meshed Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[43]  S. Granville,et al.  Strategic bidding under uncertainty: a binary expansion approach , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[44]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  On Polyhedral Approximations of the Second-Order Cone , 2001, Math. Oper. Res..

[45]  M. E. Baran,et al.  Optimal sizing of capacitors placed on a radial distribution system , 1989 .