Beyond “benefits”? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach

Current conceptual debates on the impacts of ecosystem services (ESS) on human well-being often boil down to discussing the application and limitations of monetisation approaches. Meanwhile we argue that ESS can be understood in a richer and more nuanced way if we revisit the human well-being dimension of the ESS concept, going beyond the widely cited notion of “benefits” as put forward by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA, 2005) and transcending the currently prevalent utilitarian framing. Hence, we examine ESS through the lens of the capability approach, which offers a multidimensional framework for human well-being as an alternative to mainstream utilitarian and opulence perspectives. Within this framework, ESS can be effectively viewed as contributing – in a diversity of ways – to people's capabilities, i.e., their freedoms to lead lives they have reason to value. Such a view opens up a richer debate on the human dimension of ESS and points to new potential areas and ways of application of the ESS concept.

[1]  E. Gómez‐Baggethun,et al.  Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[2]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[3]  R. Norgaard Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder , 2010 .

[4]  Breena Holland,et al.  Ecology and the Limits of Justice: Establishing Capability Ceilings in Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach , 2008 .

[5]  Fabian Scholtes,et al.  Whose Sustainability? Environmental Domination and Sen's Capability Approach , 2010 .

[6]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[7]  S. Menzel,et al.  Ecosystem Services as a Stakeholder‐Driven Concept for Conservation Science , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[9]  J. Schipperijn,et al.  Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas , 2007 .

[10]  Amartya Sen,et al.  On Ethics and Economics , 1988 .

[11]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[12]  C. Folke,et al.  The Dynamics of Social‐Ecological Systems in Urban Landscapes: Stockholm and the National Urban Park, Sweden , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  T. Plieninger,et al.  Linking Ecosystem Services with Cultural Landscape Research , 2010 .

[14]  Jérôme Ballet,et al.  A note on sustainability economics and the capability approach , 2011 .

[15]  G. Daily Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[16]  R. Howarth,et al.  Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world , 2006 .

[17]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Assets and drawbacks of the CA as a foundation for sustainability economics , 2011 .

[18]  M. Nussbaum Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach , 2011 .

[19]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[20]  Marco Grasso,et al.  Mapping sustainable development in a capability perspective , 2003 .

[21]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative , 2010 .

[22]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes , 2010 .

[23]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem‐Service Science and the Way Forward for Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  J. Farley,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global , 2010 .

[25]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  Paying for Ecosystem Services—Promise and Peril , 2011, Science.

[26]  W. CLEMENT LEY South Polar Depression of the Barometer , 1877, Nature.

[27]  S. Wunder,et al.  Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries , 2008 .

[28]  C. Spash How Much is that Ecosystem in the Window? The One with the Bio-diverse Trail , 2008 .

[29]  Séverine Deneulin,et al.  An introduction to the human development and capability approach : freedom and agency , 2009 .

[30]  K. Redford,et al.  Payment for Ecosystem Services and the Challenge of Saving Nature , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[31]  Thomas Bauler,et al.  Towards a governance of sustainability transitions: Giving place to individuals , 2013 .

[32]  S. Wunder,et al.  Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues , 2008 .

[33]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species , 1981 .

[34]  David Clark,et al.  The Capability Approach: Its Development, Critiques and Recent Advances , 2005 .

[35]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Extinction, Substitution, and Ecosystem Services , 1983 .

[36]  Ben A. Minteer,et al.  The New Conservation Debate: Ethical foundations, strategic trade-offs, and policy opportunities , 2011 .

[37]  Ronald Smith,et al.  Capabilities and Well-Being: Evidence Based on the Sen–Nussbaum Approach to Welfare , 2005 .

[38]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Exploring a nature-related conflict from a capability perspective , 2013 .

[39]  M. Sagoff The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[40]  M. Nussbaum,et al.  Book reviews , 2002 .

[41]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services , 2006 .

[42]  S. Lavorel,et al.  The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. , 2011, Comptes rendus biologies.

[43]  R. Scholes,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends , 2005 .

[44]  Joshua Goldstein,et al.  Cultural services and non-use values , 2011 .

[45]  I. Robeyns Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Human Development the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey , 2022 .

[46]  A. Cropper Convention on Biological Diversity , 1993, Environmental Conservation.

[47]  D. McCauley Selling out on nature , 2006, Nature.

[48]  D. Noonan,et al.  Ecology and Valuation: Big Changes Needed , 2007 .