A Reset State Estimator for Linear Systems to Suppress Sensor Quantization Effects

Abstract This paper presents a reset state estimator to improve the position estimation for motion control systems with sensor quantization. The reset scheme is guided by the idea that the actual output is known exactly to be at the mid-point of the two consecutive quantizer levels and is within the range of a quantizer level bounded by half of quantization step size. Hence, using this information to update the estimated state can give a better estimation under the influence of disturbance and quantization noise. We also show that the reset scheme will not destroy the stability of a baseline estimator system. The reset state estimator is applied to a linear motor control system with an optical encoder. Simulation and experiment demonstrate that the reset state estimator can achieve smaller position estimation error and more accurate tracking accuracy than those of a standard state estimator.

[1]  Torbjörn Wigren,et al.  Optimal recursive state estimation with quantized measurements , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[2]  Richard C. Kavanagh,et al.  The effects of quantization noise and sensor nonideality on digital differentiator-based rate measurement , 1998, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[3]  M. H. Perng,et al.  State estimation from incremental sensor data corrupted by track miscounts and a detection delay , 1996, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[4]  Jayantha Katupitiya,et al.  Covariance profiling for an adaptive Kalman filter to suppress sensor quantization effects , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[5]  Joono Sur,et al.  State Observer for Linear Time-Invariant Systems With Quantized Output , 1998 .

[6]  D. Delchamps Extracting state information form a quantized output record , 1990 .

[7]  R.D. Lorenz,et al.  High resolution velocity estimation for all digital, AC servo drives , 1988, Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[8]  B. Widrow,et al.  Statistical theory of quantization , 1996 .

[9]  John Y. Hung,et al.  A state estimator with reduced sensitivity to sensor quantization , 2003, IECON'03. 29th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37468).

[10]  Eric Rogers,et al.  Uncertainty, performance, and model dependency in approximate adaptive nonlinear control , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[11]  B. Anderson,et al.  Digital control of dynamic systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.