Evaluating the Effect of Computational Time Steps on Livestock Odor Dispersion Using a Computation Fluid Dynamics Model

A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model with Eulerian-Lagrangian approach was applied to predicted odour dispersion from a 3000-sow farrowing operation. Eulerian-Lagrangian approach solved turbulent air flow within Eulerian reference frame, and then calculated trajectories of discrete particles in continuous flow field within Lagrangian reference frame. Weather variables were taken every minute by the on-site weather station. The measured weather variables were synthesized into meteorological data with time intervals of 1, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min by Meteorological Processor for Regulatory Models (MPRM). Odour concentrations predicted by CFD model with different model computational time intervals were compared to evaluate the effects of time interval on odour dispersion. Predictions with 1 h time interval overestimated downwind odour concentration and travel distance compared with the predictions with sub-hour time intervals. The longer the time interval, the higher the odour concentration and the longer travel distance would be. Short time intervals (e.g. Δ t = 1 min) used in the prediction were more sensitive to wind direction shift and provided more accurate instantaneous odour plumes than longer time intervals. However application short time interval required more refined meteorological data. Keyword. Computational Fluid Dynamics, Odour, Swine, Air dispersion model, Time interval.

[1]  Eulerian-Lagrangian model for predicting odor dispersion using instrumental and human measurements , 2005 .

[2]  V A Dodd,et al.  A dispersion modelling approach to determining the odour impact of intensive pig production units in Ireland. , 2004, Bioresource technology.

[3]  J. Pospíšil,et al.  A comparison of measurements and CFD model predictions for pollutant dispersion in cities. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Alberto Brucato,et al.  Heavy gas dispersion modelling over a topographically complex mesoscale: a CFD based approach , 2005 .

[5]  Larry D. Jacobson,et al.  Comparison of five models for setback distance determination from livestock sites , 2001 .

[6]  John Paul Iselin,et al.  A comparison of contaminant plume statistics from a Gaussian puff and urban CFD model for two large cities , 2005 .

[7]  David R Schmidt,et al.  Calibrating INPUFF-2 model by resident-panelists for long-distance odor dispersion from animal production sites , 2001 .

[8]  Jong-Jin Baik,et al.  A CFD Model for Simulating Urban Flow and Dispersion , 2003 .

[9]  C. B. Parnell,et al.  INFLUENCE OF METEOROLOGICAL TIME FRAME AND VARIATION ON HORIZONTAL DISPERSION COEFFICIENTS IN GAUSSIAN DISPERSION MODELING , 2005 .

[10]  Gary J. Brown,et al.  CFD prediction of odour dispersion and plume visibility for alumina refinery calciner stacks , 2005 .

[11]  D. Carruthers,et al.  Comparisons between FLUENT and ADMS for atmospheric dispersion modelling , 2004 .

[12]  R. Heinsohn,et al.  Sources and Control of Air Pollution , 1998 .

[13]  David R Schmidt,et al.  EVALUATION OF INPUFF-2 MODEL FOR PREDICTING DOWNWIND ODORS FROM ANIMAL PRODUCTION FACILITIES , 2000 .

[14]  Bjarne Bjerg,et al.  CFD Analysis to Predict Close Range Spreading of Ventilation Air from Livestock Buildings , 2004 .

[15]  H. Guo,et al.  Evaluation of Air Dispersion Models Using Swine Odour Plume Measurement Data , 2006 .

[16]  H. Guo,et al.  Monitoring odour occurrence in the vicinity of swine farms by resident observers - Part I: odour occurrence profiles , 2005 .

[17]  Y. Li,et al.  Comparison of odor dispersion predictions between CFD and CALPUFF models , 2006 .