The DNA Damage-Sensing NER Repair Factor XPC-RAD23B Does Not Recognize Bulky DNA Lesions with a Missing Nucleotide Opposite the Lesion

The Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) mechanism removes a wide spectrum of structurally different lesions that critically depend on the binding of the DNA damage sensing NER factor XPC-RAD23B (XPC) to the lesions. The bulky mutagenic benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide metabolite-derived cis- and trans-B[a]P-dG lesions (G*) adopt base-displaced intercalative (cis) or minor groove (trans) conformations in fully paired DNA duplexes with the canonical C opposite G* (G*:C duplexes). While XPC has a high affinity for binding to these DNA lesions in fully complementary double-stranded DNA, we show here that deleting only the C in the complementary strand opposite the lesion G* embedded in 50-mer duplexes, fully abrogates XPC binding. Accurate values of XPC dissociation constants (KD) were determined by employing an excess of unmodified DNA as a competitor; this approach eliminated the binding and accumulation of multiple XPC molecules to the same DNA duplexes, a phenomenon that prevented the accurate estimation of XPC binding affinities in previous studies. Surprisingly, a detailed comparison of XPC dissociation constants KD of unmodified and lesion-containing G*:Del complexes, showed that the KD values were ∼ 2.5 – 3.6 times greater in the case of G*:Del than in the unmodified G:Del and fully base-paired G:C duplexes. The origins of this unexpected XPC lesion avoidance effect is attributed to the intercalation of the bulky, planar B[a]P aromatic ring system between adjacent DNA bases that thermodynamically stabilize the G*:Del duplexes. The strong lesion-base stacking interactions associated with the absence of the partner base, prevent the DNA structural distortions needed for the binding of the BHD2 and BHD3 β–hairpins of XPC to the deletion duplexes, thus accounting for the loss of XPC binding and the known NER-resistance of G*:Del duplexes.

[1]  Chuan He,et al.  Impact of DNA sequences in the DNA duplex opening by the Rad4/XPC nucleotide excision repair complex , 2020, bioRxiv.

[2]  Helena Scott Overproduction , 2019, Shakespeare’s Tempest and Capitalism.

[3]  O. Schärer,et al.  Single-molecule visualization reveals the damage search mechanism for the human NER protein XPC-RAD23B , 2019, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  S. Broyde,et al.  Structure and mechanism of pyrimidine–pyrimidone (6-4) photoproduct recognition by the Rad4/XPC nucleotide excision repair complex , 2019, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  N. Geacintov,et al.  Excision of Oxidatively Generated Guanine Lesions by Competing Base and Nucleotide Excision Repair Mechanisms in Human Cells. , 2019, Chemical research in toxicology.

[6]  S. Broyde,et al.  Lesion Sensing during Initial Binding by Yeast XPC/Rad4: Toward Predicting Resistance to Nucleotide Excision Repair , 2018, Chemical research in toxicology.

[7]  S. Broyde,et al.  Repair-Resistant DNA Lesions , 2017, Chemical research in toxicology.

[8]  S. Broyde,et al.  Nucleotide Excision Repair Lesion-Recognition Protein Rad4 Captures a Pre-Flipped Partner Base in a Benzo[a]pyrene-Derived DNA Lesion: How Structure Impacts the Binding Pathway , 2017, Chemical research in toxicology.

[9]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals that Rad4 Employs a Dynamic DNA Damage Recognition Process. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[10]  S. Gopal,et al.  Dissociation Dynamics of XPC-RAD23B from Damaged DNA Is a Determining Factor of NER Efficiency , 2016, PloS one.

[11]  J. Egly,et al.  Nucleotide Excision Repair and Transcriptional Regulation: TFIIH and Beyond. , 2016, Annual review of biochemistry.

[12]  S. Broyde,et al.  The relationships between XPC binding to conformationally diverse DNA adducts and their excision by the human NER system: is there a correlation? , 2014, DNA repair.

[13]  O. Schärer Nucleotide excision repair in eukaryotes. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[14]  Adebanke F. Fagbemi,et al.  The efficiencies of damage recognition and excision correlate with duplex destabilization induced by acetylaminofluorene adducts in human nucleotide excision repair. , 2012, Chemical research in toxicology.

[15]  R. Fuchs,et al.  Monitoring bypass of single replication-blocking lesions by damage avoidance in the Escherichia coli chromosome , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  A. Grollman,et al.  Lack of recognition by global-genome nucleotide excision repair accounts for the high mutagenicity and persistence of aristolactam-DNA adducts , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  D. Patel,et al.  Resistance of bulky DNA lesions to nucleotide excision repair can result from extensive aromatic lesion–base stacking interactions , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  H. Naegeli,et al.  The xeroderma pigmentosum pathway: decision tree analysis of DNA quality. , 2011, DNA repair.

[19]  S. Broyde,et al.  Probing for DNA damage with β-hairpins: similarities in incision efficiencies of bulky DNA adducts by prokaryotic and human nucleotide excision repair systems in vitro. , 2011, DNA repair.

[20]  A. Houtsmuller,et al.  UV-DDB-dependent regulation of nucleotide excision repair kinetics in living cells. , 2009, DNA repair.

[21]  L. Hanakahi,et al.  Small-scale extracts for the study of nucleotide excision repair and non-homologous end joining , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  N. Pavletich,et al.  Recognition of DNA damage by the Rad4 nucleotide excision repair protein , 2007, Nature.

[23]  S. Broyde,et al.  Following an environmental carcinogen N2-dG adduct through replication: elucidating blockage and bypass in a high-fidelity DNA polymerase , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  T. Buterin,et al.  DNA quality control by conformational readout on the undamaged strand of the double helix. , 2005, Chemistry & biology.

[25]  K. Sugasawa,et al.  Centrin 2 Stimulates Nucleotide Excision Repair by Interacting with Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group C Protein , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[26]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. , 2005, Annual review of biochemistry.

[27]  W. Mcgregor,et al.  Nucleotide Excision Repair , 2020, Definitions.

[28]  Z. Livneh,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Translesion DNA Synthesis across a Benzo[a]pyrene-Guanine Adduct in Mammalian Cells , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  A. Sancar,et al.  Recognition and repair of the cyclobutane thymine dimer, a major cause of skin cancers, by the human excision nuclease. , 2003, Genes & development.

[30]  A. Sancar,et al.  Effect of Damage Type on Stimulation of Human Excision Nuclease by SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Factor , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[31]  T. Buterin,et al.  Trapping of DNA nucleotide excision repair factors by nonrepairable carcinogen adducts. , 2002, Cancer research.

[32]  G. Krauss,et al.  The XPC-HR23B complex displays high affinity and specificity for damaged DNA in a true-equilibrium fluorescence assay. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[33]  A. Grollman,et al.  Translesion synthesis by human DNA polymerase kappa on a DNA template containing a single stereoisomer of dG-(+)- or dG-(-)-anti-N(2)-BPDE (7,8-dihydroxy-anti-9,10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene). , 2002, Biochemistry.

[34]  G. Krauss,et al.  Binding of XPA and RPA to damaged DNA investigated by fluorescence anisotropy. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[35]  K. Sugasawa,et al.  A multistep damage recognition mechanism for global genomic nucleotide excision repair. , 2001, Genes & development.

[36]  R. Wood,et al.  Stable binding of human XPC complex to irradiated DNA confers strong discrimination for damaged sites. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  R. Wood,et al.  DNA damage recognition during nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells. , 1999, Biochimie.

[38]  S. Amin,et al.  Mutagenic potential of stereoisomeric bay region (+)- and (-)-cis-anti-benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-N2-2'-deoxyguanosine adducts in Escherichia coli and simian kidney cells. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[39]  H. Naegeli,et al.  Base pair conformation-dependent excision of benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-guanine adducts by human nucleotide excision repair enzymes , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[40]  D. Patel,et al.  Solution conformation of the (-)-trans-anti-[BP]dG adduct opposite a deletion site in a DNA duplex: intercalation of the covalently attached benzo[a]pyrene into the helix with base displacement of the modified deoxyguanosine into the minor groove. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[41]  S. Spiegel,et al.  Fidelity of translesional synthesis past benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-2'-deoxyguanosine DNA adducts: marked effects of host cell, sequence context, and chirality. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[42]  A. Sancar,et al.  Overproduction, Purification, and Characterization of the XPC Subunit of the Human DNA Repair Excision Nuclease* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  D. S. Hsu,et al.  Reaction Mechanism of Human DNA Repair Excision Nuclease (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  Z. X. Wang,et al.  An exact mathematical expression for describing competitive binding of two different ligands to a protein molecule , 1995, FEBS letters.

[45]  D. Patel,et al.  Solution conformation of the (+)-cis-anti-[BP]dG adduct opposite a deletion site in a DNA duplex: intercalation of the covalently attached benzo[a]pyrene into the helix with base displacement of the modified deoxyguanosine into the minor groove. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[46]  D. Patel,et al.  Solution conformation of the (+)-trans-anti-[BP]dG adduct opposite a deletion site in a DNA duplex: intercalation of the covalently attached benzo[a]pyrene into the helix with base displacement of the modified deoxyguanosine into the major groove. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[47]  A. Grollman,et al.  Translesional synthesis on a DNA template containing a single stereoisomer of dG-(+)- or dG-(-)-anti-BPDE (7,8-dihydroxy-anti-9,10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene). , 1993, Biochemistry.

[48]  D. Patel,et al.  Solution conformation of the (+)-cis-anti-[BP]dG adduct in a DNA duplex: intercalation of the covalently attached benzo[a]pyrenyl ring into the helix and displacement of the modified deoxyguanosine. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[49]  D. Patel,et al.  Solution conformation of the major adduct between the carcinogen (+)-anti-benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide and DNA. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Jia-Ling Yang,et al.  Kinds and location of mutations induced by (±)-7β,8α- dihydroxy-9α,10α-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene in the coding region of the hypoxanthine (guanine) phosphoribosyltransferase gene in diploid human fibroblasts , 1991 .

[51]  J. Mccormick,et al.  Kinds and location of mutations induced by (+/-)-7 beta,8 alpha-dihydroxy-9 alpha,10 alpha-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene in the coding region of the hypoxanthine (guanine) phosphoribosyltransferase gene in diploid human fibroblasts. , 1991, Carcinogenesis.

[52]  T. Kunkel Misalignment-mediated DNA synthesis errors. , 1990, Biochemistry.