The effect of conductivity values on activation times and defibrillation thresholds

Uncertainty in the input parameters used in simulation studies needs to be taken into account when evaluating the results produced. This work considers the effect of using various sets of bidomain conductivity values in two simulations: firstly, activation times, which indicate the propagation of the depolarisation wavefront through the cardiac tissue, and, secondly, the determination of defibrillation thresholds in a ‘heart in a bath’ model, where a shock is delivered from two opposing patch electrodes. Both simulations use the same two types of sets of bidomain conductivity values: four-conductivity datasets (where normal and transverse conductivities are assumed equal) and six-conductivity datasets, including newly proposed sets that are based on experimental measurements. The activation time maps show significant differences depending on the conductivity set used, as do the defib-rillation thresholds. The defibrillation thresholds vary by more than 20%, whereas the activation times for epicardial breakthrough and total de polarisation both vary by approximately 50%b. It is found that the most extreme values in each case are produced by two of the four-conductivity datasets. Since these differences are large enough to lead to different conclusions in such studies, it is suggested that the four-conductivity datasets may not be an appropriate choice for use in simulation studies in the heart.

[1]  K. T. ten Tusscher,et al.  Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[2]  Joakim Sundnes,et al.  Simulation of ST segment changes during subendocardial ischemia using a realistic 3-D cardiac geometry , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Barbara M. Johnston,et al.  Six Conductivity Values to Use in the Bidomain Model of Cardiac Tissue , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Peter R Johnston,et al.  A sensitivity study of conductivity values in the passive bidomain equation. , 2011, Mathematical biosciences.

[5]  Peter R. Johnston,et al.  The effect of conductivity values on ST segment shift in subendocardial ischaemia , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Barbara M. Johnston,et al.  The Sensitivity of the Passive Bidomain Equation to Variations in Six Conductivity Values , 2013, BioMed 2013.

[7]  Bruce H Smaill,et al.  Laminar Arrangement of Ventricular Myocytes Influences Electrical Behavior of the Heart , 2007, Circulation research.

[8]  A. M. Scher,et al.  Influence of Cardiac Fiber Orientation on Wavefront Voltage, Conduction Velocity, and Tissue Resistivity in the Dog , 1979, Circulation research.

[9]  H Zhang,et al.  Models of cardiac tissue electrophysiology: progress, challenges and open questions. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[10]  Darren A Hooks,et al.  Myocardial segment-specific model generation for simulating the electrical action of the heart , 2007, Biomedical engineering online.

[11]  A. M. Scher,et al.  Effect of Tissue Anisotropy on Extracellular Potential Fields in Canine Myocardium in Situ , 1982, Circulation research.

[12]  L. Clerc Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Leslie Tung,et al.  A bi-domain model for describing ischemic myocardial d-c potentials , 1978 .

[14]  B. Roth Electrical conductivity values used with the bidomain model of cardiac tissue , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Bruce H Smaill,et al.  Three Distinct Directions of Intramural Activation Reveal Nonuniform Side-to-Side Electrical Coupling of Ventricular Myocytes , 2009, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.