The Thatcher illusion in humans and monkeys

Primates possess the remarkable ability to differentiate faces of group members and to extract relevant information about the individual directly from the face. Recognition of conspecific faces is achieved by means of holistic processing, i.e. the processing of the face as an unparsed, perceptual whole, rather than as the collection of independent features (part-based processing). The most striking example of holistic processing is the Thatcher illusion. Local changes in facial features are hardly noticeable when the whole face is inverted (rotated 180°), but strikingly grotesque when the face is upright. This effect can be explained by a lack of processing capabilities for locally rotated facial features when the face is turned upside down. Recently, a Thatcher illusion was described in the macaque monkey analogous to that known from human investigations. Using a habituation paradigm combined with eye tracking, we address the critical follow-up questions raised in the aforementioned study to show the Thatcher illusion as a function of the observer's species (humans and macaques), the stimulus' species (humans and macaques) and the level of perceptual expertise (novice, expert).

[1]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[2]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[3]  J. Fagot,et al.  Baboons (Papio papio) spontaneously process the first‐order but not second‐order configural properties of faces , 2008, American journal of primatology.

[4]  V Bruce,et al.  Configural Features in the Context of Upright and Inverted Faces , 2001, Perception.

[5]  R. Bhatt,et al.  The Thatcher illusion and face processing in infancy. , 2004, Developmental science.

[6]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  Information Processing during Face Recognition: The Effects of Familiarity, Inversion, and Morphing on Scanning Fixations , 2006, Perception.

[7]  Christoph D. Dahl,et al.  Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Yisheng Zhu,et al.  Spatial-Temporal Analysis of Face Processing Using an ERP Study of the Thatcher Illusion , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  L. Parr,et al.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing. , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  The Effect of Rotation on Configural Encoding in a Face-Matching Task , 2007, Perception.

[11]  Sam S. Rakover,et al.  Facial inversion effects: Parts and whole relationship , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[13]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Ultra High-Resolution fMRI in Monkeys with Implanted RF Coils , 2002, Neuron.

[14]  R. Hampton,et al.  Thatcher Effect in Monkeys Demonstrates Conservation of Face Perception across Primates , 2009, Current Biology.

[15]  Thomas D. Albright,et al.  How Do Monkeys Look at Faces? , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Y. Sugita.  Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the Thatcher illusion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  G. V. Hoesen,et al.  Face recognition in the rhesus monkey , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  W. Sjoberg,et al.  Recognition Times for Rotated Normal and “Thatcher” Faces , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  K. Fujita.  Species preference by infant macaques with controlled social experience , 1990, International journal of primatology.

[21]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  The Lady'S Not for Turning: Rotation of the Thatcher Illusion , 2001, Perception.

[22]  M. Eimer.  Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  M. Corballis,et al.  Turn that frown upside down: ERP effects of thatcherization of misorientated faces. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[24]  K. Fujita.  Development of visual preference for closely related species by infant and juvenile macaques with restricted social experience , 1993, Primates.

[25]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: an event-related brain potentials study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[28]  Christoph D. Dahl,et al.  Humans and Macaques Employ Similar Face-Processing Strategies , 2009, Current Biology.

[29]  T. Hendler,et al.  Feeling or Features Different Sensitivity to Emotion in High-Order Visual Cortex and Amygdala , 2001, Neuron.

[30]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[31]  C. Keating,et al.  Visual Scan Patterns of Rhesus Monkeys Viewing Faces , 1982, Perception.

[32]  T. Parks,et al.  Thatcher and the Cheshire Cat: Context and the Processing of Facial Features , 1985, Perception.

[33]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Thatcher Illusion: Dependence on Angle of Rotation , 2000, Perception.

[34]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Face recognition: A study in information fusion using fuzzy integral , 2005, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[35]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[36]  M. Tomonaga.  How laboratory-raised Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) perceive rotated photographs of monkeys: Evidence for an inversion effect in face perception , 1994, Primates.

[37]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[39]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.