Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias

A wine-loving economist we know purchased some nice Bordeaux wines years ago at low prices. The wines have greatly appreciated in value, so that a bottle that cost only $10 when purchased would now fetch $200 at auction. This economist now drinks some of this wine occasionally, but would neither be willing to sell the wine at the auction price nor buy an additional bottle at that price. Thaler (1980) called this pattern—the fact that people often demand much more to give up an object than they would be willing to pay to acquire it—the endowment effect. The example also illustrates what Samuelson and Zeckhauser (1988) call a status quo bias, a preference for the current state that biases the economist against both buying and selling his wine. These anomalies are a manifestation of an asymmetry of value that Kahneman and Tversky (1984) call loss aversion—the disutility of giving up an object is greater that the utility associated with acquiring it. This column documents the evidence supporting endowment effects and status quo biases, and discusses their relation to loss aversion.

[1]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[2]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[3]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Individual Rationality, Market Rationality, and Value Estimation , 2000 .

[4]  D. Kahneman,et al.  CHAPTER EIGHT. Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market , 2004 .

[5]  William D. Schulze,et al.  The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value , 1987 .

[6]  Joel Huber,et al.  An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks , 1987 .

[7]  J. A. Sinden,et al.  The Persistence of Evaluation Disparities , 1987 .

[8]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[9]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[10]  J. Knetsch.  The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. , 1989 .

[11]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Siting a High‐Level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada , 1990 .

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  Michael J. Doane,et al.  Consumer Rationality and the Status Quo , 1991 .

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[15]  David Cohen,et al.  Judicial Choice and Disparities between Measures of Economic Values , 1992, Osgoode Hall Law Journal.

[16]  J. Baron,et al.  Status-quo and omission biases , 1992 .