The structure and configuration changes of multifunctional peptide vectors enhance gene delivery efficiency

We designed a series of peptide vectors that contain functional fragments with the goal of enhancing cellular internalization and gene transfection efficiency. The functional fragments included a cell-penetrating peptide (R9), a cationic amphiphilic α-helical peptide [(LLKK)3-H6 or (LLHH)3], a stearyl moiety, and cysteine residues. Vectors were also synthesized with D-type amino acids to improve their proteolytic stability. The conformations, particle sizes, and zeta potentials for complexes of these peptides with pGL3 plasmid DNA were characterized by circular dichroism and dynamic light scattering. In addition, cellular uptake of the peptide/DNA complexes and gene transfection efficiency were investigated with fluorescence-activated cell sorting and confocal laser-scanning microscopy. Greater transfection efficiency was achieved with the vectors containing the R9 segment, and the efficiency was greater than Lipo2000. In addition, the D-type C18-c(llkk)3ch6-r9 had about 7 times and 5.5 times the transfection efficiency of Lipo2000 in 293T cells and NIH-3T3 cells at the N/P ratio of 6, respectively. Overall, the multifunctional peptide gene vectors containing the R9 segment exhibited enhanced cellular internalization, a high gene transfection efficiency, and low cytotoxicity.

[1]  Sen Yang,et al.  Enhanced gene transfection efficiency by use of peptide vectors containing laminin receptor-targeting sequence YIGSR. , 2018, Nanoscale.

[2]  T. Flotte,et al.  Gene Therapy 2017: Progress and Future Directions , 2017, Clinical and translational science.

[3]  Saji Uthaman,et al.  Bioreducible branched poly(modified nona‐arginine) cell‐penetrating peptide as a novel gene delivery platform , 2017, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[4]  Zhao Meng,et al.  Histidine-enriched multifunctional peptide vectors with enhanced cellular uptake and endosomal escape for gene delivery. , 2017, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[5]  K. Numata,et al.  Self-Assembled Peptide-Based System for Mitochondrial-Targeted Gene Delivery: Functional and Structural Insights. , 2016, Biomacromolecules.

[6]  Hui-zhen Jia,et al.  Fabrication of dual responsive co-delivery system based on three-armed peptides for tumor therapy. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[7]  I. Toth,et al.  Endosome Escape Strategies for Improving the Efficacy of Oligonucleotide Delivery Systems. , 2015, Current medicinal chemistry.

[8]  Liang Xu,et al.  Peptide amphiphiles with multifunctional fragments promoting cellular uptake and endosomal escape as efficient gene vectors. , 2015, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[9]  D. Ding,et al.  Dynamic biostability, biodistribution, and toxicity of L/D-peptide-based supramolecular nanofibers. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[10]  S. Biswal,et al.  Characterizing α-helical peptide aggregation on supported lipid membranes using microcantilevers. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Y. Bae,et al.  Role of Polymeric Endosomolytic Agents in Gene Transfection: A Comparative Study of Poly(l-lysine) Grafted with Monomeric l-Histidine Analogue and Poly(l-histidine) , 2014, Biomacromolecules.

[12]  Ü. Langel,et al.  Cell-penetrating peptides: design, synthesis, and applications. , 2014, ACS nano.

[13]  J. Haldar,et al.  Small molecular antibacterial peptoid mimics: the simpler the better! , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Anita Mann,et al.  Linear short histidine and cysteine modified arginine peptides constitute a potential class of DNA delivery agents. , 2014, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[15]  Yin Xiao,et al.  Polymer nanocarrier system for endosome escape and timed release of siRNA with complete gene silencing and cell death in cancer cells. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[16]  Emmanouil D Karagiannis,et al.  Rational design of a biomimetic cell penetrating peptide library. , 2013, ACS nano.

[17]  T. Wirth,et al.  History of gene therapy. , 2013, Gene.

[18]  Jie Zhou,et al.  Dephosphorylation of D-peptide derivatives to form biofunctional, supramolecular nanofibers/hydrogels and their potential applications for intracellular imaging and intratumoral chemotherapy. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  Lily Yang,et al.  Targeted delivery of siRNA-generating DNA nanocassettes using multifunctional nanoparticles. , 2013, Small.

[20]  J. R. Vargas,et al.  Fifteen years of cell-penetrating, guanidinium-rich molecular transporters: basic science, research tools, and clinical applications. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[21]  Xian‐Zheng Zhang,et al.  PEGylated Peptide Based Reductive Polycations as Efficient Nonviral Gene Vectors , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[22]  F. Beltram,et al.  A novel chimeric cell-penetrating peptide with membrane-disruptive properties for efficient endosomal escape. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[23]  Kevin Braeckmans,et al.  On the cellular processing of non-viral nanomedicines for nucleic acid delivery: mechanisms and methods. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[24]  Xiangning Li,et al.  Target delivery of a gene into the brain using the RVG29-oligoarginine peptide. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[25]  T. Jin,et al.  Uptake mechanisms of non-viral gene delivery. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[26]  Qingbin Meng,et al.  Tunable self-assembled peptide amphiphile nanostructures. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[27]  Munia Ganguli,et al.  Structural rearrangements and chemical modifications in known cell penetrating peptide strongly enhance DNA delivery efficiency. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[28]  Paul H. Johnson,et al.  pH-responsive polymeric micelle carriers for siRNA drugs. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[29]  L. Liang,et al.  Nanoparticle-based delivery system for application of siRNA in vivo. , 2010, Current drug metabolism.

[30]  Daoben Zhu,et al.  Micrometer‐Sized Organic Single Crystals, Anisotropic Transport, and Field‐Effect Transistors of a Fused‐Ring Thienoacene , 2009 .

[31]  R. Juliano,et al.  Biological barriers to therapy with antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides. , 2009, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[32]  Meredith A Mintzer,et al.  Nonviral vectors for gene delivery. , 2009, Chemical reviews.

[33]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[34]  Shu Wang,et al.  An endosomolytic Tat peptide produced by incorporation of histidine and cysteine residues as a nonviral vector for DNA transfection. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[35]  P. Fischer.  Cellular uptake mechanisms and potential therapeutic utility of peptidic cell delivery vectors: Progress 2001–2006 , 2007, Medicinal research reviews.

[36]  A. Kostyukova,et al.  Molecular basis of tropomyosin binding to tropomodulin, an actin-capping protein. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  Shiroh Futaki,et al.  Octaarginine-modified multifunctional envelope-type nano device for siRNA. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[38]  I. Zuhorn,et al.  Gene delivery by cationic lipid vectors: overcoming cellular barriers , 2007, European Biophysics Journal.

[39]  L. Tönges,et al.  Stearylated octaarginine and artificial virus-like particles for transfection of siRNA into primary rat neurons. , 2006, RNA.

[40]  W. Seeger,et al.  DNA transfer into human lung cells is improved with Tat-RGD peptide by caveoli-mediated endocytosis. , 2006, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[41]  Vladimir P Torchilin,et al.  Intracellular delivery of large molecules and small particles by cell-penetrating proteins and peptides. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[42]  Steven F Dowdy,et al.  Cationic TAT peptide transduction domain enters cells by macropinocytosis. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[43]  N. Lockwood,et al.  Promotion of peptide antimicrobial activity by fatty acid conjugation. , 2004, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[44]  Eric Vives,et al.  Cell-penetrating Peptides , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  K. Pattabiraman,et al.  The design, synthesis, and evaluation of molecules that enable or enhance cellular uptake: peptoid molecular transporters. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  J. Rothbard,et al.  Polyarginine enters cells more efficiently than other polycationic homopolymers. , 2000, The journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society.

[47]  E Marshall,et al.  Gene Therapy Death Prompts Review of Adenovirus Vector , 1999, Science.

[48]  D. Scherman,et al.  A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  F. Szoka,et al.  Polyamidoamine cascade polymers mediate efficient transfection of cells in culture. , 1993, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[50]  Carl O. Pabo,et al.  Cellular uptake of the tat protein from human immunodeficiency virus , 1988, Cell.

[51]  V. Patravale,et al.  Endosomal escape: a bottleneck in intracellular delivery. , 2014, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[52]  H. Harashima,et al.  The transfection activity of R8-modified nanoparticles and siRNA condensation using pH sensitive stearylated-octahistidine. , 2013, Biomaterials.