Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China

Men and women at Northwest University (n = 631), Xi'an, China, were asked to rate the attractiveness of male or female figures manipulated to vary somatotype, waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR), secondary sexual traits, and other features. In study 1, women rated the average masculine somatotype as most attractive, followed by the mesomorphic (muscular), ectomorphic (slim), and endomorphic (heavily built) somatotypes, in descending order of preference. In study 2, the amount and distribution of masculine trunk (chest and abdominal) hair were altered progressively in a series of front‐posed figures. Women rated figures with no or little trunk hair as most attractive. Study 3 assessed the attractiveness of front‐posed male figures which varied only in length of their nonerect penis. Numerical ratings for this trait were low, but moderate lengthening of the penis (22% or 33% above average) resulted in a significant increase in scores for attractiveness. In study 4, Chinese men rated the attractiveness of back‐posed female images varying in waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR from 0.5–1.0). The 0.6 WHR figure was most preferred, followed by 0.7, while figures with higher ratios (0.9 or 1.0) were significantly less attractive. Study 5 rated the attractiveness of female skin color: men expressed a marked preference for images which were lighter in color, as compared to images of average or darker skin colors. These results, the first of their kind reported for a Chinese population, support the view that sexual selection has influenced the evolution of human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 19:88–95, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  C. Darwin The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[2]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Coren L. Apicella,et al.  Perceived mate fidelity and paternal resemblance predict men's investment in children , 2004 .

[4]  C. Ellis,et al.  Physiologic skin changes in pregnancy. , 1984, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[5]  D. Mcburney,et al.  Waist–hip ratio and attractiveness: New evidence and a critique of “a critical test” , 2003 .

[6]  Ronald Henss Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations , 2000 .

[7]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder , 2010, Phunny Stuph.

[8]  Theodosius Dobzhansky ATLAS OF MEN , 1955 .

[9]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Evolutionary fitness: Tall men have more reproductive success , 2000, Nature.

[10]  D. Zellner,et al.  Figure Preferences in Two Generations of Men: The Use of Figure Drawings Illustrating Differences in Muscle Mass , 1999 .

[11]  J. Thompson,et al.  Male Body Depilation: Prevalence and Associated Features of Body Hair Removal , 2005 .

[12]  A. Štulhofer How (Un)Important Is Penis Size for Women with Heterosexual Experience? , 2006, Archives of sexual behavior.

[13]  A. Jolly Lucy's Legacy: Sex and Intelligence in Human Evolution , 1999 .

[14]  C. Darwin The descent of man, and Selection in relation to sex, Vol 1. , 1871 .

[15]  F. Marlowe The evolution of desire: By David M. Buss, New York: Basic Books, 1994 , 1995 .

[16]  L. Tassinary,et al.  A Critical Test of the Waist-to-Hip-Ratio Hypothesis of Female Physical Attractiveness , 1998 .

[17]  Peter Frost,et al.  Human Skin Color: A Possible Relationship Between Its Sexual Dimorphism and Its Social Perception , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[18]  Bulking up: The roles of sex and sexual orientation on attempts to manipulate physical attractiveness , 1997 .

[19]  D. Maisey,et al.  Characteristics of male attractiveness for women , 1999, The Lancet.

[20]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The mystery of female beauty , 1999, Nature.

[21]  G. Miller The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature , 2000 .

[22]  Sodhi Vk,et al.  Dermatoses of pregnancy. , 1988 .

[23]  M. Tovée,et al.  Visual cues to female physical attractiveness , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  I. Mysterud The rise and fall of the third chimpanzee , 1993 .

[25]  Devendra Singh,et al.  Female mate value at a glance: relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. , 2002, Neuro endocrinology letters.

[26]  B. Gräslund Early Humans and Their World , 2005 .

[27]  G. Jasienska,et al.  Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Jared M. Diamond,et al.  Why Is Sex Fun?: The Evolution of Human Sexuality , 1997 .

[29]  A. Dixson Primate Sexuality: Comparative Studies of the Prosimians, Monkeys, Apes, and Humans , 1998 .

[30]  R. K. Young,et al.  Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships , 1995 .

[31]  A. Dixson,et al.  Masculine Somatotype and Hirsuteness as Determinants of Sexual Attractiveness to Women , 2003, Archives of sexual behavior.

[32]  P. V. D. Berghe,et al.  Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene culture co‐evolution?* , 1986 .

[33]  Devendra Singh,et al.  Body shape and women’s attractiveness , 1993, Human nature.

[34]  C. Bouchard,et al.  Somatotype and indicators of metabolic fitness in youth , 1998, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[35]  F. Marlowe,et al.  How Universal Are Preferences for Female Waist-to-Hip Ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania , 1999 .

[36]  M. Tovée,et al.  Maternal waist-to-hip ratio does not predict child gender , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  C. Apicella,et al.  Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies , 2005 .

[38]  D. Symons Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. , 1995 .

[39]  H. Lukaski,et al.  Association of dominant somatotype of men with body structure, function during exercise, and nutritional assessment , 2000, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[40]  A. Schützwohl Judging female figures: A new methodological approach to male attractiveness judgments of female waist-to-hip ratio , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[41]  D. Bramble,et al.  Endurance running and the evolution of Homo , 2004, Nature.