Evaluation of anatomy based reconstruction for partial volume correction in brain FDG-PET

UNLABELLED FDG-PET contributes to the diagnosis and management of neurological diseases. In some of these diseases, pathological gray matter (GM) areas may have a reduced FDG uptake. Detection of these regions can be difficult and some remain undiscovered using visual assessment. The main reason for this detection problem is the relatively small thickness of GM compared to the spatial resolution of PET, known as the partial volume effect. We have developed an anatomy-based maximum-a-posteriori reconstruction algorithm (A-MAP) which corrects for this effect during the reconstruction using segmented magnetic resonance (MR) data. Monte-Carlo based 3-D brain software phantom simulations were used to investigate the influence of the strength of anatomy-based smoothing in GM, the influence of misaligned MR data, and the effect of local segmentation errors. A human observer study was designed to assess the detection performance of A-MAP versus post-smoothed maximum-likelihood (ML) reconstruction. We demonstrated the applicability of A-MAP using real patient data. The results for A-MAP showed improved recovery values and robustness for local segmentation errors. Misaligned MR data reduced the recovery values towards those obtained by post-smoothed ML, for small registration errors. In the human observer study, detection accuracy of hypometabolic regions was significantly improved using A-MAP, compared to post-smoothed ML (P < 0.004). The patient study confirmed the applicability of A-MAP in clinical practice. CONCLUSION A-MAP is a promising technique for voxel-based partial volume correction of FDG-PET of the human brain.

[1]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  J. Nuyts,et al.  A concave prior penalizing relative differences for maximum-a-posteriori reconstruction in emission tomography , 2000 .

[3]  H. Mayberg,et al.  Correction of PET Data for Partial Volume Effects in Human Cerebral Cortex by MR Imaging , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  M. Defrise A factorization method for the 3D X-ray transform , 1995 .

[5]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  C. C. Watson New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999 .

[7]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Anatomical-based FDG-PET reconstruction for the detection of hypo-metabolic regions in epilepsy , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  B F Hutton,et al.  Minimum cross-entropy reconstruction of PET images using prior anatomical information. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Multimodality Bayesian algorithm for image reconstruction in positron emission tomography: a tissue composition model , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  J. Nuyts,et al.  Comparison between MAP and post-processed ML for incorporating anatomical knowledge in emission tomography , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[11]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[12]  J C Froment,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Metabolic Data Corrected for Cortical Atrophy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1996, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[13]  Walter Oberschelp,et al.  Expectation maximization reconstruction of positron emission tomography images using anatomical magnetic resonance information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  J. Mugler,et al.  Three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo imaging (3D MP RAGE) , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of functional images using anatomical information as priors , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[17]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Evaluation of maximum-likelihood based attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 1998 .

[18]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction and use of anatomical a priori information for emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  A Bayesian Joint Mixture Framework for the Integration of Anatomical Information in Functional Image Reconstruction , 2000, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[20]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  G Brix,et al.  Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Measurement of Radiotracer Concentration in Brain Gray Matter Using Positron Emission Tomography: MRI-Based Correction for Partial Volume Effects , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[25]  A. Burgess Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[26]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Partial Volume Correction: Estimation and Algorithms , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[27]  Michael A. King,et al.  LROC analysis of detector-response compensation in SPECT , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  F Fazio,et al.  Importance of partial-volume correction in brain PET studies. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[30]  J.A. Fessler,et al.  Regularized emission image reconstruction using imperfect side information , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[31]  P. Suetens,et al.  Anatomical based FDG-PET reconstruction for the detection of hypometabolic regions in epilepsy , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[32]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Clinically feasible reconstruction of 3D whole-body PET/CT data using blurred anatomical labels. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.