Social Media, Surveillance, and News Work

Social media platforms are becoming an indispensable resource for journalists. Their use involves both direct interaction with the platforms themselves and, increasingly, the use of specialist third-party apps to find, filter, and follow content and contributors. This article explores some of the ways that social media platforms, and their technological ecosystems, are infusing news work. A range of platforms and apps—including Geofeedia, Spike, and Twitter—were critically examined, and their use by trainee journalists (N = 81) analysed. The results reveal how journalists can—and do—surveil social network users and their content via sophisticated, professional apps that are also utilised by the police and security forces. While journalists recognise the value of such apps in news work, they also have concerns, including about privacy and popularism. Although the participants in this study thought the apps they used could help with verification, there were warning signs that an over-reliance on the technology could develop, dulling journalists’ critical faculties.

[1]  Richard Fletcher,et al.  Giving Computers a Nose for News , 2016, The Future of Journalism: Risks, Threats and Opportunities.

[2]  F. Vis TWITTER AS A REPORTING TOOL FOR BREAKING NEWS , 2013 .

[3]  Henrik Bødker International Journalism , 2012 .

[4]  Bahareh Rahmanzadeh Heravi,et al.  Twitter journalism in Ireland: sourcing and trust in the age of social media* , 2016 .

[5]  Xiaomo Liu,et al.  Reuters Tracer: A Large Scale System of Detecting & Verifying Real-Time News Events from Twitter , 2016, CIKM.

[6]  Á. Gulyás Hybridity and Social Media Adoption by Journalists , 2017 .

[7]  Claudette Guzan Artwick REPORTERS ON TWITTER , 2013 .

[8]  Lisette Johnston,et al.  Social News = Journalism Evolution? , 2016, The Future of Journalism: Risks, Threats and Opportunities.

[9]  N. Newman,et al.  Identifying and Verifying News through Social Media , 2014 .

[10]  Neil Thurman,et al.  Mixed methods communication research: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in the study of online journalism , 2018 .

[11]  Mark Dredze,et al.  Facebook, Twitter and Google Plus for Breaking News: Is There a Winner? , 2014, ICWSM.

[12]  Kevin Wallsten,et al.  Non-Elite Twitter Sources Rarely Cited in Coverage , 2015 .

[13]  Annelore Deprez,et al.  Networking or Not Working? , 2014 .

[14]  A. Bruns,et al.  Agenda-setting revisited : Social media and sourcing in mainstream journalism , 2015 .

[15]  Investigative Reporting in the Networked Media Environment , 2017 .

[16]  A. Følstad,et al.  Emerging Journalistic Verification Practices Concerning Social Media , 2016 .

[17]  M. Broersma,et al.  TWITTER AS A NEWS SOURCE , 2013 .

[18]  S. Lewis,et al.  23 Mapping the Human–Machine Divide in Journalism , 2016 .

[19]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[20]  Nicholas Diakopoulos,et al.  Computational Journalism and The Emergence Of News Platforms , 2016 .

[21]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  The Huffington Post , 2010 .

[22]  Arthur D. Santana,et al.  Tapping Into a New Stream of (Personal) Data , 2016 .

[23]  Alfred Hermida,et al.  Sourcing the Arab Spring: A Case Study of Andy Carvin's Sources on Twitter During the Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  A. Hermida,et al.  Sourcing the Arab Spring : A Case Study of Andy Carvin ’ s Sources During the Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions Introduction , 2012 .

[25]  Yiannis Kompatsiaris,et al.  Sensing Trending Topics in Twitter , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[26]  Martha Stone Big Data for Media , 2014 .

[27]  S. Heinzl [Our sources]. , 1992, Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten.