‘Real without being concrete’: the ontology of public concern and its significance for the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF)

Abstract Public concern is a pivotal notion in the risk perception, communication and management literature. It is, for example, a central concept with regard to the social amplification of risk, and as a justification for policy attention. Despite its ubiquity, the notion of public concern remains a ‘black box’ presenting a poorly understood state of affairs as a reified matter-of-fact. Paying attention to the deployment and metrics of public concern, and the work it is required to do, will enhance the power of approaches to understanding risk, and policymaking. Thus, the broad purpose of this paper is to unpack the notion of public concern by adopting an ontological yet critical perspective, drawing on a range of literature that considers ontology. We reflect on how publics and public concern have been conceptualised with regard to the dichotomies of individual/social and private/public, given that they imply different levels and dimensions of concern. We draw on empirical work that illuminates the assessment and measurement of public concern and how the public have responded to risk events. Considering public concern through an ontological lens affords a means of drawing renewed critical attention to objects that might otherwise appear finished or ready-made.

[1]  V. Bakir Policy Agenda Setting and Risk Communication , 2006 .

[2]  D. Tolia‐Kelly Affect – an ethnocentric encounter? Exploring the ‘universalist’ imperative of emotional/affectual geographies , 2006 .

[3]  Michael Henderson Issue Publics, Campaigns, and Political Knowledge , 2014 .

[4]  J. Barnett,et al.  ‘I’d like to report a suspicious looking tree’: Public concern, public attention and the nature of reporting about ash dieback in the United Kingdom , 2018, Public understanding of science.

[5]  Luis E. Hestres Preaching to the choir: Internet-mediated advocacy, issue public mobilization, and climate change , 2014, New Media Soc..

[6]  J. Leask,et al.  Communicating about risk: strategies for situations where public concern is high but the risk is low. , 2017, Public health research & practice.

[7]  M. Griffiths Hope in Hebron: The Political Affects of Activism in a Strangled City , 2017 .

[8]  D. Lupton Beyond the 'affect heuristic': the emotion-risk assemblage , 2012 .

[9]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Environmental Concern and the Business Cycle: The Chilling Effect of Recession , 2010 .

[10]  K. Grint Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of ‘leadership’ , 2005 .

[11]  A. Leiserowitz Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[12]  B. Massumi The Future Birth of the Affective Fact: The Political Ontology of Threat , 2009 .

[13]  Jerry Busby Why risk is recursive and what this entails , 2016 .

[14]  John Fellenor Particular experiences: a psychosocial exploration of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and its relationship with self, environment and the material world , 2015 .

[15]  M. Falagas,et al.  Reaction to the threat of influenza pandemic: the mass media and the public , 2006, Critical care.

[16]  J. Barnett,et al.  The social amplification of risk on Twitter: the case of ash dieback disease in the United Kingdom , 2018 .

[17]  M. Callon The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[18]  R. Rorty Contingency, irony, and solidarity: Contents , 1989 .

[19]  S. Oskamp Attitudes and opinions. 3rd ed , 1977 .

[20]  Manuel Delanda Deleuzian Social Ontology and Assemblage Theory , 2006 .

[21]  Vian Bakir,et al.  Greenpeace v. Shell: media exploitation and the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) , 2005 .

[22]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society , 1989 .

[23]  D. Strech,et al.  Collective agency and the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis , 2016, BMC Medical Ethics.

[24]  Matteo Plebani,et al.  Ontology and Metaontology: A Contemporary Guide , 2015 .

[25]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory , 2003 .

[26]  W. Wildman An Introduction to Relational Ontology , 2009 .

[27]  Jerry Busby,et al.  Risk amplification as social attribution , 2013 .

[28]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[29]  Yu Jie Ng,et al.  To fear or not to fear? Applying the social amplification of risk framework on two environmental health risks in Singapore , 2018 .

[30]  James Painter,et al.  Climate Skepticism in British Newspapers, 2007–2011 , 2016 .

[31]  Jon Heuch What lessons need to be learnt from the outbreak of Ash Dieback Disease, Chalara fraxinea in the United Kingdom? , 2014 .

[32]  Denis Smith,et al.  Risk and Crisis Management in the Public Sector: Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of , 1998 .

[33]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Marianne Elisabeth Lien,et al.  Slippery: Field notes in empirical ontology , 2013 .

[35]  Stéphanie Missonier,et al.  Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology , 2014 .

[36]  Y. Yonay When Black Boxes Clash: Competing Ideas of What Science Is in Economics, 1924-39 , 1994 .

[37]  E. Rosa The Social Amplification of Risk: The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Meta theoretical foundations and policy implications , 2003 .

[38]  G. Ray Funkhouser,et al.  THE ISSUES OF THE SIXTIES: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY IN THE DYNAMICS OF PUBLIC OPINION , 1973 .

[39]  C. Hay Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction , 2002 .

[40]  Rens Vliegenthart,et al.  News Coverage and Public Concern About Immigration in Britain , 2017 .

[41]  Julie Barnett,et al.  Ash dieback and other tree pests and pathogens: dispersed risk events and the Social Amplification of Risk Framework , 2019, Journal of Risk Research.

[42]  B. Slife Taking Practice Seriously: Toward a Relational Ontology. , 2004 .

[43]  Denis Smith,et al.  Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Public Sector Risk , 1998 .

[44]  E. Laclau On Populist Reason , 2005 .

[45]  Stewart,et al.  Ordinary Affects , 2020, Ordinary Affects.

[46]  O. Kvasova,et al.  Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour , 2010 .

[47]  T. Getzen,et al.  Health Care is an Individual Necessity and a National Luxury: Applying Multilevel Decision Models to the Analysis of Health Care Expenditures , 2000, Journal of health economics.

[48]  John S Brownstein,et al.  Measuring vaccine confidence: analysis of data obtained by a media surveillance system used to analyse public concerns about vaccines. , 2013, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[49]  Donald MacLean,et al.  Complexity Theory and Strategic Change: An Empirically Informed Critique , 2005 .

[50]  C. Hay Does Ontology Trump Epistemology? Notes on the Directional Dependence of Ontology and Epistemology in Political Analysis , 2007 .

[51]  Michael Lynch,et al.  Ontography: Investigating the production of things, deflating ontology , 2013 .

[52]  Alberto Maria Segre,et al.  The Use of Twitter to Track Levels of Disease Activity and Public Concern in the U.S. during the Influenza A H1N1 Pandemic , 2011, PloS one.

[53]  Brian Fay,et al.  Contemporary philosophy of social science : a multicultural approach , 1996 .

[54]  Mihai Nadin Rethinking the experiment: necessary (R)evolution , 2017, AI & SOCIETY.

[55]  J. Pakulski,et al.  The Dynamics of Environmental Issues in Australia: Concerns, Clusters and Carriers , 1998 .

[56]  T. Catlaw Fabricating the People: Politics and Administration in the Biopolitical State , 2007 .

[57]  Javier Lezaun,et al.  Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics , 2007 .

[58]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[59]  T. Leschine Oil Spills and the Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk , 2002 .

[60]  Florian M. Neisser ‘Riskscapes’ and risk management – Review and synthesis of an actor-network theory approach , 2014, Risk Management.

[61]  C. Venn A Note on Assemblage , 2006 .

[62]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Credibility and trust in risk communication , 1991 .

[63]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[64]  S. Woolgar,et al.  The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? , 2013 .

[65]  Kirk Hallahan,et al.  Inactive publics: the forgotten publics in public relations∗ , 2000 .

[66]  B. Latour Turning Around Politics , 2007 .

[67]  L. Deliens,et al.  ‘Burden to others’ as a public concern in advanced cancer: a comparative survey in seven European countries , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[68]  M. Callon,et al.  Некоторые элементы социологии перевода: приручение морских гребешков и рыболовов бухты Сен-Бриё , 2017 .

[69]  J. Searle The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[70]  Manuel Delanda Realism and the history of chemistry , 2017 .

[71]  Mario Blaser POLITICAL ONTOLOGY , 2009 .

[72]  P. Converse The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964) , 2006, The Nature of Belief Systems Reconsidered.

[73]  P. Converse The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[74]  D. Collins,et al.  Towards inclusion: Local government, public space and homelessness in New Zealand , 2006 .

[75]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[76]  J. Schunk,et al.  Should we fear "flu fear" itself? Effects of H1N1 influenza fear on ED use. , 2012, The American journal of emergency medicine.