Authorship: From credit to accountability - Reflections from the Editors' network.

The Editors' Network of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) provides a dynamic forum for editorial discussions and endorses the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) to improve the scientific quality of biomedical journals. Authorship confers credit and important academic rewards. Recently, however, the ICMJE emphasized that authorship also requires responsibility and accountability. These issues are now covered by the new -(fourth) criterion for authorship. Authors should agree to be accountable and ensure that questions regarding the accuracy and integrity of the entire work will be appropriately addressed. This review discusses the implications of this paradigm shift on authorship requirements with the aim of increasing awareness on good scientific and editorial practices.

[1]  L. DeTora,et al.  Substantial contribution and accountability: best authorship practices for medical writers in biomedical publications , 2018, Current medical research and opinion.

[2]  S. Eriksson,et al.  Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers , 2017, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

[3]  F. Zotor,et al.  Publication Practices and Responsible Authorship: A Review Article , 2017, Journal of public health in Africa.

[4]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Locating ethics in data science: responsibility and accountability in global and distributed knowledge production systems , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  David B Resnik,et al.  Authorship policies of scientific journals , 2015, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[6]  V. Prasad,et al.  Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications , 2015, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[7]  W. Wahli,et al.  Authorship in scientific publications: analysis and recommendations. , 2015, Swiss medical weekly.

[8]  M. Nylenna,et al.  Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers , 2014, BMC Medical Ethics.

[9]  S. Stretton,et al.  Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature , 2014, BMJ Open.

[10]  Amber Prakash,et al.  The fruits of authorship , 2014, Education for health.

[11]  D. Fanelli.  Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[12]  J. Stephenson.  ICMJE: All authors of medical journal articles have "responsibility to stand by the integrity of the entire work". , 2013, JAMA.

[13]  T. Lancet.  Authorship and accountability , 2013, The Lancet.

[14]  Li-Qun Yang,et al.  Equal Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship in Major Anaesthesia Journals during a 10-Yr Period , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  T. Prabhakar Clement,et al.  Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[16]  T. Lüscher.  The codex of science: honesty, precision, and truth--and its violations. , 2013, European heart journal.

[17]  B. Dotson,et al.  Equal Contributions and Credit Assigned to Authors in Pharmacy Journals , 2013, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[18]  Richard A. Smith,et al.  Let’s simply scrap authorship and move to contributorship , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  P. Vardas,et al.  Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals , 2011, Heart.

[20]  A. Flanagin,et al.  Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  E. Lautenbach,et al.  "Equal" contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship. , 2010, Annals of epidemiology.

[22]  C. Lau,et al.  The role of European national journals in education , 2009, Heart.

[23]  Elizabeth Wager,et al.  Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? , 2007, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[24]  Adam Jacobs.  Exorcising ghosts and unwelcome guests. , 2006, Annals of internal medicine.

[25]  A. Overbeke,et al.  What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names? A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). , 1998, JAMA.

[26]  D. Rennie,et al.  Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. , 1998, JAMA.

[27]  D. Rennie,et al.  When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. , 1997, JAMA.

[28]  N W Goodman,et al.  Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research , 1994, BMJ.

[29]  M. Shapiro,et al.  The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. , 1994, JAMA.

[30]  D. Rennie,et al.  Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. , 1994, JAMA.

[31]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation. , 2015, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[32]  C. Filippi,et al.  Increased rates of authorship in radiology publications: a bibliometric analysis of 142,576 articles published worldwide by radiologists between 1991 and 2012. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  P. Vardas,et al.  European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals: the 'editors' network'. , 2010, European heart journal.

[34]  Young Ha Park,et al.  Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. , 2003, Radiology.