Does China’s major Payment for Ecosystem Services program meet the “gold criteria”? Targeting strategies of different decision-makers

[1]  Y. Lü,et al.  Scale and landscape features matter for understanding the performance of large payments for ecosystem services , 2020 .

[2]  Liu Jiangyi,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of different types of payments for ecosystem services: A case in the urban wetland ecosystem , 2020 .

[3]  F. Putz,et al.  Forest cover effects of payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from an impact evaluation in Brazil , 2020 .

[4]  Li An,et al.  Mechanisms behind concurrent payments for ecosystem services in a Chinese nature reserve , 2020 .

[5]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Hidden cost of conservation: A demonstration using losses from human-wildlife conflicts under a payments for ecosystem services program , 2020 .

[6]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Estimating inter-regional payments for ecosystem services: Taking China’s Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region as an example , 2020 .

[7]  S. Sacchelli,et al.  A spatial-based tool for the analysis of payments for forest ecosystem services related to hydrogeological protection , 2020 .

[8]  E. Corbera,et al.  Pragmatic conservation: Discourses of payments for ecosystem services in Colombia , 2020, Geoforum.

[9]  L. Hein,et al.  Spatial quantification to examine the effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services: A case study of Costa Rica’s Pago de Servicios Ambientales , 2020 .

[10]  Haojie Chen.  Land use trade-offs associated with protected areas in China: Current state, existing evaluation methods, and future application of ecosystem service valuation. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Yutao Wang,et al.  From payments for ecosystem services to eco-compensation: Conceptual change or paradigm shift? , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Jian Peng,et al.  Simulating the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services trade-offs in Northwestern Yunnan, China , 2019, Ecosystem Services.

[13]  Katherine Brownson,et al.  Community-Based Payments for Ecosystem Services (CB-PES): Implications of community involvement for program outcomes , 2019, Ecosystem Services.

[14]  Biao Yang,et al.  How much will cash forest encroachment in rainforests cost? A case from valuation to payment for ecosystem services in China , 2019, Ecosystem Services.

[15]  K. Paudel,et al.  Policy improvements and farmers' willingness to participate: Insights from the new round of China's Sloping Land Conversion Program , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[16]  T. T. Pham,et al.  How fair can incentive-based conservation get? The interdependence of distributional and contextual equity in Vietnam's payments for Forest Environmental Services Program , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[17]  B. Verbist,et al.  Farmers’ perspectives on payments for ecosystem services in Uganda , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[18]  Hong Qiu,et al.  Opportunity cost, income structure, and energy structure for landholders participating in payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from Wolong National Nature Reserve, China , 2019, World Development.

[19]  Li Chen,et al.  Spatial characteristics of land uses and ecological compensations based on payment for ecosystem services model from 2000 to 2015 in Sichuan Province, China , 2019, Ecol. Informatics.

[20]  L. Menapace,et al.  Determinants of the environmental conservation and poverty alleviation objectives of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs , 2019, Ecosystem Services.

[21]  L. Loft,et al.  Effectiveness and equity of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Real-effort experiments with Vietnamese land users , 2018, Land Use Policy.

[22]  S. Wolf,et al.  A targeted approach to payments for ecosystem services , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[23]  N. Lienhoop,et al.  Involving multiple actors in ecosystem service governance: Exploring the role of stated preference valuation , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[24]  Xiaohui Yang,et al.  Impact of a cross-jurisdictional Payment for Ecosystem Services program on the participants’ welfare in North China , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[25]  Kelly W. Jones,et al.  The influence of cash and technical assistance on household-level outcomes in payments for hydrological services programs in Chiapas, Mexico , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[26]  Chong Jiang,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into effectiveness assessment of ecological restoration program in northern China's arid areas: Insights from the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region , 2018, Land Use Policy.

[27]  Jiyuan Liu,et al.  Improving ecological conservation and restoration through payment for ecosystem services in Northeastern Tibetan Plateau, China , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[28]  Lixiao Zhang,et al.  A top-down framework for cross-regional payments for ecosystem services , 2018 .

[29]  D. Campbell,et al.  Bamboo vs. crops: an integrated emergy and economic evaluation of using bamboo to replace crops in south Sichuan Province, China. , 2018, Journal of cleaner production.

[30]  M. Jenkins,et al.  The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[31]  B. Fu,et al.  Land use optimization based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Yanhe watershed , 2018 .

[32]  S. Wunder,et al.  From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[33]  Simron Jit Singh,et al.  Improving payments for ecosystem services (PES) outcomes through the use of Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) and the software OPTamos , 2018 .

[34]  J. Sauer,et al.  The cost effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services—Smallholders and agroforestry in Africa , 2018 .

[35]  Chengchao Wang,et al.  Impact of a regional payment for ecosystem service program on the livelihoods of different rural households , 2017 .

[36]  Zhifeng Yang,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services in China: Policy, practice, and progress , 2017 .

[37]  R. Huber,et al.  Interaction effects of targeted agri-environmental payments on non-marketed goods and services under climate change in a mountain region , 2017 .

[38]  Chris J. Kennedy,et al.  Considering farmer land use decisions in efforts to ‘scale up’ Payments for Watershed Services , 2017 .

[39]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Pay the farmer, or buy the land?—Cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services versus land purchases or easements in Central Kenya , 2016 .

[40]  R. Yin,et al.  Assessing the decadal impact of China's sloping land conversion program on household income under enrollment and earning differentiation , 2015 .

[41]  Jan Adamowski,et al.  Capabilities as justice: Analysing the acceptability of payments for ecosystem services (PES) through ‘social multi-criteria evaluation’ , 2015 .

[42]  Yali Zhao,et al.  Who are the stakeholders and how do they respond to a local government payments for ecosystem services program in a developed area: A case study from Suzhou, China , 2015 .

[43]  Jianying Xu,et al.  Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in the Next-Stage Grain-for-Green Project in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China , 2015, Environmental Management.

[44]  R. Yin,et al.  Assessing the impact of China’s sloping land conversion program on household production efficiency under spatial heterogeneity and output diversification , 2015 .

[45]  S. Démurger,et al.  Volunteer and Satisfied? Rural Households’ Participation in a Payments for Environmental Services Programme in Inner Mongolia , 2015 .

[46]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia , 2015 .

[47]  Thomas Sikor,et al.  Notions of Justice in Payments for Ecosystem Services:Insights from China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program in Yunnan Province , 2015 .

[48]  Sarah Schomers,et al.  An analytical framework for assessing the potential of intermediaries to improve the performance of payments for ecosystem services , 2015 .

[49]  J. Adamowski,et al.  Juggling multiple dimensions in a complex socio-ecosystem: The issue of targeting in payments for ecosystem services , 2015 .

[50]  Georg Kindermann,et al.  Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes - The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies , 2015 .

[51]  N. Hanley,et al.  Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes , 2014 .

[52]  N. Heerink,et al.  Household-level effects of China's Sloping Land Conversion Program under price and policy shifts , 2014 .

[53]  R. Yin,et al.  The implementation and impacts of China's largest payment for ecosystem services program as revealed by longitudinal household data , 2014 .

[54]  Y. Lü,et al.  Changes of livelihood due to land use shifts: A case study of Yanchang County in the Loess Plateau of China , 2014 .

[55]  S. Speelman,et al.  Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil , 2014 .

[56]  Adrian Martin,et al.  Measuring effectiveness, efficiency and equity in an experimental Payments for Ecosystem Services trial , 2014, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[57]  Tom Clements,et al.  Evidence of Payments for Ecosystem Services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods , 2014 .

[58]  Sven Wunder,et al.  When payments for environmental services will work for conservation , 2013 .

[59]  XI En-d.  THE EFFECT OF SOIL WATER EROSION ABOUT CONVERSION OF CROPLAND TO FOREST ON THE LOESS HILLY REGION-TAKING WUQI COUNTY AS AN EXAMPLE , 2013 .

[60]  Peter Kelly,et al.  Do farmers or governments make better land conservation choices? Evidence from China's Sloping Land Conversion Program , 2013 .

[61]  K. Mullan,et al.  Participation in Payments for Ecosystem Services programmes: accounting for participant heterogeneity , 2012 .

[62]  Katharine R. E. Sims,et al.  Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program , 2012, Land Economics.

[63]  S. Pagiola,et al.  Assessing the potential for synergies in the implementation of payments for environmental services programmes: an empirical analysis of Costa Rica , 2011, Environmental Conservation.

[64]  A. Viña,et al.  Using Cost‐Effective Targeting to Enhance the Efficiency of Conservation Investments in Payments for Ecosystem Services , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[65]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Poverty, development, and environment , 2010, Environment and Development Economics.

[66]  Jeffrey C. Milder,et al.  Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. , 2010 .

[67]  Zhigang Xu,et al.  China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program: Does Expansion Equal Success? , 2010, Land Economics.

[68]  U. Pascual,et al.  Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach , 2010 .

[69]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services with Dual Goals of Environment and Poverty Alleviation , 2010, Environmental management.

[70]  Shunbo Yao,et al.  Agricultural Productivity Changes Induced by the Sloping Land Conversion Program: An Analysis of Wuqi County in the Loess Plateau Region , 2010, Environmental management.

[71]  A. Janvry,et al.  The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services , 2008, Environment and Development Economics.

[72]  Shu-hao Tan,et al.  Impacts of Cultivated Land Conversion on Environmental Sustainability and Grain Self-Sufficiency in China , 2008 .

[73]  P. Ferraro.  Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services , 2008 .

[74]  Michael T. Bennett,et al.  China's sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? , 2008 .

[75]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints, and Off‐Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain‐For‐Green Program on Rural Households in China , 2008 .

[76]  Changhe Lu,et al.  Implications for development of grain-for-green policy based on cropland suitability evaluation in desertification-affected north China , 2007 .

[77]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Grain for Green: Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability of China’s Conservation Set-Aside Program , 2005, Land Economics.

[78]  S. Pagiola,et al.  Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America , 2005 .

[79]  D. Zilberman,et al.  Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies , 2001 .