Convergence properties of iterative soft onion peeling

The concept of iterative multiuser detection for a multiple access adder AWGN channel is coupled with turbo code used for each user, followed by an interleaver. The iterative decoding exchanges the likelihood information both among the two constituent codes of each user and among the users. The information exchange among users is performed for each chip, using a Gaussian approximation for other user's contribution. The described iterative decoding procedure, when applied to unequal user power case, implicitly implements the "onion peeling" concept-strong users converge first, their contribution to the residual noise decreases, and then the weaker users converge. This property, in focus here, was applied in previous work to illustrate applications to multiple access communication and to broadcast channels. The difference from the classical "onion peeling" is that rather than decoding a user completely and then subtracting its contribution, the convergence here occurs over several layers simultaneously. The convergence properties of the proposed method are studied, with special emphasis on the case of equal rate users with exponentially related powers.

[1]  U. Madhow,et al.  On the capacity of cellular CDMA with successive decoding and controlled power disparities , 1998, VTC '98. 48th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference. Pathway to Global Wireless Revolution (Cat. No.98CH36151).

[2]  Andrew J. Viterbi,et al.  Very Low Rate Convolutional Codes for Maximum Theoretical Performance of Spread-Spectrum Multiple-Access Channels , 1990, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[3]  Claude Berrou,et al.  Frame-oriented convolutional turbo codes , 1996 .

[4]  Soosan Beheshti,et al.  Iterative interference cancellation and decoding for spread-signature CDMA systems , 1997, 1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion.

[5]  A. Glavieux,et al.  Near Shannon limit error-correcting coding and decoding: Turbo-codes. 1 , 1993, Proceedings of ICC '93 - IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[6]  Michael Moher,et al.  An iterative multiuser decoder for near-capacity communications , 1998, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Spectral Efficiency of CDMA with Random Spreading , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Bixio Rimoldi,et al.  Potential impact of rate-splitting multiple access on cellular communications , 1996, Proceedings of GLOBECOM'96. 1996 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[9]  B. Rimoldi Rate-Splitting Multiple Access and Cellular Communication , 1996 .

[10]  John Cocke,et al.  Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate (Corresp.) , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Loïc Brunel,et al.  Code division multiple access based on independent codes and turbo decoding , 1999, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[12]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Iterative soft onion peeling for multi-access and broadcast channels , 1998, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (Cat. No.98TH8361).

[13]  Matthew C. Valenti,et al.  Iterative multiuser detection for convolutionally coded asynchronous DS-CDMA , 1998, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (Cat. No.98TH8361).

[14]  Stephen V. Hanly,et al.  The capacity improvement of an integrated successive decoding and power control scheme , 1997, Proceedings of ICUPC 97 - 6th International Conference on Universal Personal Communications.

[15]  Paul D. Alexander,et al.  Iterative multiuser detection for CDMA with FEC: near-single-user performance , 1998, IEEE Trans. Commun..