Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument

Abstract The paper presents results from an exploratory study that: (1) developed a theory-based measure of PIU and (2) administered the instrument to a sample of undergraduate students to assess the associations among PIU and several psychosocial variables including, depression, self-esteem, loneliness, and shyness. A new instrument, the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale (GPIUS) was designed to operationalize Davis's [Computers in Human Behavior, 17 (2001), 187] theoretical construct of generalized PIU. The GPIUS and several measures of psychosocial well-being were administered to 386 undergraduate students. Results from this preliminary study indicate that the GPIUS is both reliable and valid. A factor analysis identified seven unique sub-dimensions of the GPIUS, including: mood alteration, perceived social benefits available online, negative outcomes associated with Internet use, compulsive Internet use, excessive amounts of time spent online, withdrawal symptoms when away from the Internet, and perceived social control available online. All GPIUS subscales were correlated with psychosocial health variables including: depression, loneliness, shyness, and self-esteem. A regression analysis identified several important psychosocial and cognitive–behavioral predictors of negative outcomes associated with generalized PIU. Results also suggest that one's preference for computer-mediated social interaction, as opposed to face-to-face interaction, plays a role in the etiology, development, and outcomes of generalized PIU.

[1]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[2]  Viktor Brenner.  Psychology of Computer Use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet Use, Abuse and Addiction: The First 90 Days of the Internet Usage Survey , 1997, Psychological reports.

[3]  M. Pratarelli,et al.  The bits and bytes of computer/internet addiction: A factor analytic approach , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[4]  M. A. Shotton.  The costs and benefits of ‘computer addiction’ , 1991 .

[5]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[6]  D. Russell,et al.  The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  J. Gackenbach.  Psychology and the Internet : intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications , 1998 .

[8]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology , 2000 .

[9]  M. Rosenberg.  Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[10]  J. Vander Bilt,et al.  "Computer addiction": a critical consideration. , 2000, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[11]  James G. Phillips,et al.  Potential determinants of heavier internet usage , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and Discriminant Validity Evidence , 1980 .

[13]  Griffiths,et al.  Internet “addiction”: an issue for clinical psychology? , 1996, Clinical Psychology Forum.

[14]  M. Griffiths.  Internet addiction: Does it really exist? , 1998 .

[15]  Jonathan J. Kandell,et al.  Internet Addiction on Campus: The Vulnerability of College Students , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[16]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[17]  K. Scherer.  College Life On-Line: Healthy and Unhealthy Internet Use. , 1997 .

[18]  Kimberly Young,et al.  The Relationship Between Depression and Internet Addiction , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Does Internet and Computer "Addiction" Exist? Some Case Study Evidence , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  T. Field,et al.  The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents. , 2000, Adolescence.

[21]  W. H. Jones,et al.  Shyness: conceptualization and measurement. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Mark Griffiths,et al.  Psychology of Computer Use: XLIII. Some Comments on ‘Addictive Use of the Internet’ by Young , 1997, Psychological reports.

[23]  Keith W. Beard,et al.  Modification in the Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Internet Addiction , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[24]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Introduction to Factor Analysis: What It Is and How To Do It , 1978 .

[25]  J. Morahan-Martin,et al.  Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students ? ? Portions of this pa , 2000 .

[26]  K. Young,et al.  Psychology of Computer Use: XL. Addictive Use of the Internet: A Case That Breaks the Stereotype , 1996, Psychological reports.

[27]  D. J. Lee.  Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[28]  May R. Berenbaum,et al.  Caught in the Net , 2001 .

[29]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[30]  R. A. Davis,et al.  A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  C. H. Oh,et al.  Some comments on , 1998 .

[32]  Patricia Wallace.  The Psychology of the Internet , 1999 .

[33]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Running head : Communication Addiction Communication Addiction Disorder : Concern over Media , Behavior and Effects , 1999 .