The taste of cuteness: How claims and cute visuals affect consumers’ perception of insect-based foods

[1]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  I might try it: Marketing actions to reduce consumer disgust toward insect-based food , 2023, Journal of Retailing.

[2]  C. Rosell,et al.  Edible insects as foods: mapping scientific publications and product launches in the global market (1996-2021) , 2022, Journal of Insects as Food and Feed.

[3]  J. Dupont,et al.  Acceptance of Insect-Based Food Products in Western Societies: A Systematic Review , 2022, Frontiers in Nutrition.

[4]  Hsuan‐Yi Chou,et al.  The healing effect of cute elements , 2021, Journal of Consumer Affairs.

[5]  Felipe Reinoso-Carvalho,et al.  Promoting Healthier Drinking Habits: Using Sound to Encourage the Choice for Non-Alcoholic Beers in E-Commerce , 2021, Foods.

[6]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  Toward Healthier Cookie Habits: Assessing the Role of Packaging Visual Appearance in the Expectations for Dietary Cookies in Digital Environments , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[7]  P. Peter,et al.  Information and taste interventions for improving consumer acceptance of edible insects: a pilot study , 2020 .

[8]  N. Lacetera,et al.  How does it taste? Appreciation of insect-based snacks and its determinants , 2020 .

[9]  I. M. Bermúdez-Serrano,et al.  Challenges and opportunities for the development of an edible insect food industry in Latin America , 2020, Journal of Insects as Food and Feed.

[10]  Sujaya Rao,et al.  University Student Perspectives of Entomophagy: Positive Attitudes Lead to Observability and Education Opportunities , 2020, Journal of insect science.

[11]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perceived naturalness, disgust, trust and food neophobia as predictors of cultured meat acceptance in ten countries , 2020, Appetite.

[12]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods , 2020, Current Opinion in Food Science.

[13]  L. Gasco,et al.  Current scenario in the European edible-insect industry: a preliminary study , 2020 .

[14]  J. LeBel,et al.  Edible insect marketing in Western countries: wisely weighing the foodstuff, the foodie, and the foodscape , 2020 .

[15]  Jan Schoormans,et al.  Hip and authentic. Defining neo-retro style in package design , 2020 .

[16]  Nicolas Treich,et al.  Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare , 2020, Food Policy.

[17]  K. Grunert,et al.  A self-report measure of attitudes toward the eating of insects: construction and validation of the Entomophagy Attitude Questionnaire , 2020 .

[18]  Florian Fiebelkorn,et al.  Acceptance of insects as food in Germany: Is it about sensation seeking, sustainability consciousness, or food disgust? , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[19]  M. Onwezen,et al.  Consumer acceptance of insects as food and feed: The relevance of affective factors , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[20]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Effect of Packaging Perceptual Cues on Consumer Disposal Behavior of Partially Consumed Products , 2019, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.

[21]  S. Mancini,et al.  European consumers' readiness to adopt insects as food. A review. , 2019, Food research international.

[22]  Benedikt Schnurr.  Too Cute to Be Healthy: How Cute Packaging Designs Affect Judgments of Product Tastiness and Healthiness , 2019, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.

[23]  B. Urbano,et al.  Consumers’ willingness to purchase three alternatives to meat proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic , 2019 .

[24]  P. Rozin,et al.  Disgust, sushi consumption, and other predictors of acceptance of insects as food by Americans and Indians , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[25]  C. Boks,et al.  Consumer acceptance of edible insects and design interventions as adoption strategy , 2019, International Journal of Food Design.

[26]  Riccardo Vecchio,et al.  Willingness to pay for insect-based food: The role of information and carrier , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[27]  W. Willett,et al.  Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems , 2019, The Lancet.

[28]  M. Niva,et al.  Insect Consumption Attitudes among Vegans, Non-Vegan Vegetarians, and Omnivores , 2019, Nutrients.

[29]  C. Spence,et al.  Influences of visual attributes of food packaging on consumer preference and associations with taste and healthiness , 2018, International Journal of Consumer Studies.

[30]  Fabian Christandl,et al.  When Utilitarian Claims Backfire: Advertising Content and the Uptake of Insects as Food , 2018, Front. Nutr..

[31]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Development and validation of the Food Disgust Picture Scale , 2018, Appetite.

[32]  Anna M. Crump,et al.  Australian Consumers’ Awareness and Acceptance of Insects as Food , 2018, Insects.

[33]  Charles Spence,et al.  ‘Show me the goods’: Assessing the effectiveness of transparent packaging vs. product imagery on product evaluation , 2018 .

[34]  Chun-Tuan Chang,et al.  The spell of cuteness in food consumption? It depends on food type and consumption motivation , 2017 .

[35]  Zachary Estes,et al.  The value of art in marketing: An emotion-based model of how artworks in ads improve product evaluations , 2017 .

[36]  E. Haubruge,et al.  Could new information influence attitudes to foods supplemented with edible insects , 2017 .

[37]  C. Graaf,et al.  Why a ‘light’ product package should not be light blue: Effects of package colour on perceived healthiness and attractiveness of sugar- and fat-reduced products , 2017 .

[38]  Davide Menozzi,et al.  Eating novel foods: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product , 2017 .

[39]  Cristina Mora,et al.  Exploring young foodies׳ knowledge and attitude regarding entomophagy: A qualitative study in Italy , 2017 .

[40]  Julien Delarue,et al.  Non-verbal evaluation of acceptance of insect-based products using a simple and holistic analysis of facial expressions , 2017 .

[41]  Xavier Gellynck,et al.  Comparison of response formats and concurrent hedonic measures for optimal use of the EmoSensory® Wheel. , 2017, Food research international.

[42]  Edith G. Smit,et al.  Signalling product healthiness through symbolic package cues: Effects of package shape and goal congruence on consumer behaviour , 2017, Appetite.

[43]  Robert Mai,et al.  Light and Pale Colors in Food Packaging: When Does This Package Cue Signal Superior Healthiness or Inferior Tastiness? , 2016 .

[44]  J. House.  Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: Academic and commercial implications , 2016, Appetite.

[45]  R. Buckley.  Aww: The Emotion of Perceiving Cuteness , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[46]  T. Giudice,et al.  The effect of communication and implicit associations on consuming insects: An experiment in Denmark and Italy , 2016, Appetite.

[47]  Nadine Karnal,et al.  See how tasty it is? Effects of symbolic cues on product evaluation and taste , 2016 .

[48]  U. Orth,et al.  Healthy by design, but only when in focus: Communicating non-verbal health cues through symbolic meaning in packaging , 2016 .

[49]  H. Steur,et al.  Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions , 2016 .

[50]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review , 2016 .

[51]  A. Fenko,et al.  What’s in a name? The effects of sound symbolism and package shape on consumer responses to food products , 2016 .

[52]  Jingyi Lu,et al.  Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[53]  M. Bornstein,et al.  On Cuteness: Unlocking the Parental Brain and Beyond , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Hiroshi Nittono,et al.  The two-layer model of ‘kawaii’: A behavioural science framework for understanding kawaii and cuteness , 2016 .

[55]  Kristina Klein,et al.  Speaking to the mind or the heart: effects of matching hedonic versus utilitarian arguments and products , 2016 .

[56]  Young Wook Kim,et al.  An Exploration and Investigation of Edible Insect Consumption: The Impacts of Image and Description on Risk Perceptions and Purchase Intent , 2016 .

[57]  A. Fenko,et al.  The role of nutrition labels and advertising claims in altering consumers' evaluation and choice , 2016, Appetite.

[58]  W. Ripple,et al.  Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[59]  V. Kooijman,et al.  The role of emotions in food choice and liking , 2015 .

[60]  M. Shelomi.  Why we still don't eat insects: Assessing entomophagy promotion through a diffusion of innovations framework , 2015 .

[61]  M. Siegrist,et al.  The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China , 2015 .

[62]  P. Rozin,et al.  Determinants of willingness to eat insects in the USA and India , 2015 .

[63]  Mark Kosters,et al.  From mechanism to virtue: Evaluating Nudge theory , 2015 .

[64]  Charles Spence,et al.  Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts , 2015 .

[65]  W. Verbeke.  Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society , 2015 .

[66]  Gergana Y. Nenkov,et al.  "So cute I could eat it up": : Priming effects of cute products on indulgent consumption , 2014 .

[67]  Lena Ekelund,et al.  Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food – A review , 2014 .

[68]  Mitzi M. Montoya,et al.  Brand‐Specific Design Effects: Form and Function , 2013 .

[69]  C. Werle,et al.  Unhealthy food is not tastier for everybody: The “healthy=tasty” French intuition , 2013 .

[70]  S. Posavac,et al.  How Naive Theories Drive Opposing Inferences from the Same Information , 2013 .

[71]  S. Loo,et al.  Eating (with) Insects: Insect Gastronomies and Upside-Down Ethics , 2013 .

[72]  P. Desmet,et al.  Influence of package design on the dynamics of multisensory and emotional food experience , 2013 .

[73]  H. Moriya,et al.  The Power of Kawaii: Viewing Cute Images Promotes a Careful Behavior and Narrows Attentional Focus , 2012, PloS one.

[74]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Approach and Avoidance Motivation: Investigating Hedonic Consumption in a Retail Setting , 2012 .

[75]  Joop de Boer,et al.  Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution , 2012, Appetite.

[76]  A. Litt,et al.  Manipulating basic taste perception to explore how product information affects experience , 2012 .

[77]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Isn't It Cute: An Evolutionary Perspective of Baby-Schema Effects in Visual Product Designs , 2011 .

[78]  Remi Trudel,et al.  Looks Interesting, but what does it Do? Evaluation of Incongruent Product form Depends on Positioning , 2011 .

[79]  Evan Selinger,et al.  Is There a Right Way to Nudge? The Practice and Ethics of Choice Architecture , 2011 .

[80]  Joseph W. Alba,et al.  Seeing Is Believing (Too Much): The Influence of Product Form on Perceptions of Functional Performance , 2011 .

[81]  Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al.  Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations , 2011 .

[82]  K. Morgan,et al.  The urban foodscape: world cities and the new food equation , 2010 .

[83]  E. Martinsdóttir,et al.  Impact of health-related claims on the perception of other product attributes , 2010 .

[84]  K. Lorenz,et al.  Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung. , 2010 .

[85]  R. Leslie,et al.  Entomophagy and its impact on world cultures: the need for a multidisciplinary approach. , 2010 .

[86]  Xiaoyan Deng,et al.  Is Your Product on the Right Side? The “Location Effect” on Perceived Product Heaviness and Package Evaluation , 2009 .

[87]  Gaëlle Pantin-Sohier,et al.  L'influence du packaging sur les associations fonctionnelles et symboliques de l'image de marque , 2009 .

[88]  E. Köster.  Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective , 2009 .

[89]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions , 2008 .

[90]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Benefits , 2008 .

[91]  Pinya Silayoi,et al.  The Importance of Packaging Attributes: A Conjoint Analysis Approach , 2007 .

[92]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  The Unhealthy = Tasty Intuition and Its Effects on Taste Inferences, Enjoyment, and Choice of Food Products , 2006 .

[93]  P. Pliner,et al.  “Ugh! That's disgusting!”: Identification of the characteristics of foods underlying rejections based on disgust , 2006, Appetite.

[94]  A. Chernev.  Goal-Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice , 2004 .

[95]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[96]  K. Roininen,et al.  Quantification of Consumer Attitudes to Health and Hedonic Characteristics of Foods , 1999, Appetite.

[97]  D. Mela.  Food choice and intake: the human factor , 1999, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[98]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  THE GENERATION OF SENSORY EXPECTATION BY EXTERNAL CUES AND ITS EFFECT ON SENSORY PERCEPTION AND HEDONIC RATINGS: A REVIEW , 1996 .

[99]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees , 1992 .

[100]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[101]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation , 1989 .

[102]  Richard M. Ganley,et al.  Emotion and eating in obesity: A review of the literature , 1989 .

[103]  G. Bower.  Mood and memory. , 1981, The American psychologist.

[104]  Dana Quade,et al.  Rank Analysis of Covariance , 1967 .