Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals

While consensus is often taken to be the ideal way to secure political legitimacy, a more robust pluralism has many defenders too. We attempt to reconcile arguments for pluralism and consensus. Pluralism ought to be accepted and valued at the simple level of values, beliefs, and preferences. Pluralism at this level can nevertheless coexist with normative, epistemic, and/or preference meta-consensus, all of which have qualities that should attract even pluralists. However, close attention must be paid to the content of meta-consensus and the conditions of its production or discovery.

[1]  I. Berlin,et al.  Four Essays on Liberty , 1969 .

[2]  J. Knight,et al.  Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy , 1994 .

[3]  J. Waldron.  Liberalism, Political and Comprehensive , 2004 .

[4]  Iris Marion Young,et al.  Communication and the other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy , 1995 .

[5]  J. Forester.  Dealing with Deep Value Differences , 1999 .

[6]  Benjamin Zablocki,et al.  Alienation and Charisma: A Study of Contemporary American Communes , 1980 .

[7]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[8]  Simon Niemeyer,et al.  Deliberation in the Wilderness: Displacing Symbolic Politics , 2004 .

[9]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1996 .

[10]  T. Kuran.  Insincere deliberation and democratic failure , 1998 .

[11]  I. Young.  Inclusion and Democracy , 2002 .

[12]  Simon Niemeyer.  Deliberation in the wilderness : transforming policy preferences through discourse , 2002 .

[13]  C. List,et al.  Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation , 2002, British Journal of Political Science.

[14]  Jon Elster,et al.  Deliberative Democracy: Deliberation and Constitution Making , 1998 .

[15]  William E. Connolly,et al.  Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox , 1991 .

[16]  C. Sunstein.  Incompletely Theorized Agreements , 1995 .

[17]  D. Black.  On the Rationale of Group Decision-making , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  B. Honig.  Political Theory And The Displacement Of Politics , 1993 .

[19]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  The Open Society and Its Enemies , 1952 .

[20]  Ronald Dworkin,et al.  Taking Rights Seriously , 1977 .

[21]  J. Elster.  The Multiple Self , 1987 .

[22]  Steven R. Brown.  Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. , 1980 .

[23]  C. Mouffe.  The Democratic Paradox , 2000 .

[24]  D. Schlosberg.  Environmental justice and the new pluralism : the challenge of difference for environmentalism , 1999 .

[25]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science , 1992 .

[26]  C. Mouffe.  Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism , 2000 .

[27]  Arend Lijphart,et al.  Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration , 1979 .

[28]  Bernard Manin,et al.  On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation , 1987 .

[29]  A. Macintyre,et al.  Whose Justice? Which Rationality? , 1989, The New Social Theory Reader.

[30]  Stephen K. White,et al.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy@@@The Cambridge Companion to Habermas , 1997 .

[31]  J. Bohman,et al.  Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy , 1998 .

[32]  J. Femia.  Complexity and deliberative democracy , 1996 .

[33]  W. Riker,et al.  Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice , 1982 .

[34]  A. Maclntyre,et al.  Does Applied Ethics Rest on a Mistake , 1984 .

[35]  J. Forester,et al.  Facilitating Statewide HIV/AIDS Policies and Priorities in Colorado , 1999 .

[36]  S. Tesh,et al.  Uncertain Hazards: Environmental Activists and Scientific Proof , 2000 .

[37]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[38]  N. Rescher,et al.  Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus , 1994 .

[39]  W. Galston.  Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[40]  Christian List,et al.  Two Concepts of Agreement , 2002 .

[41]  Joshua Cohen,et al.  DELIBERATION AND DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY , 2005, Philosophy, Politics, Democracy.

[42]  Murray Edelman,et al.  The symbolic uses of politics , 1967 .