A Hybrid Pricing Mechanism for Joint System Optimization and Social Acceptance

In this paper, we propose a socially-accepted local electricity pricing mechanism for households that is dependent on the electric load of the neighbourhood and is able to flatten out the neighbourhood profile. The cost function used for this pricing mechanism is a piecewise linear approximation of a quadratic function.The motivation for using this mechanism is that the energy transition is expected to result in higher peak loads in electricity consumption as well as in renewable generation, which poses a significant challenge to the distribution grids. To tackle this problem, electricity consumption profiles need to be flattened.Following the literature, quadratic cost functions have proven their ability to achieve such a system optimization. However, their problem is that consumers find the resulting pricing mechanisms too complex and are generally unwilling to participate when offered these prices. In contrast, the social acceptance of simple pricing mechanisms such as currently used in practice is high, but these mechanisms are hardly giving any incentive to reduce peaks in electricity profiles.Based on the feedback of consumers participating in our field test and the criteria defined in the literature, we conclude that the proposed mechanism is socially accepted. Furthermore, a numerical evaluation shows that our proposed mechanism can flatten out peaks on the neighbourhood level, albeit that its convergence is slightly slower than by using the quadratic cost function. These two findings imply that the presented pricing mechanism has the potential to be useful in practice.

[1]  Elisabeth Dütschke,et al.  Dynamic electricity pricing - Which programs do consumers prefer? , 2013 .

[2]  Shaolei Ren,et al.  Bidirectional Energy Trading and Residential Load Scheduling with Electric Vehicles in the Smart Grid , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Fangxing Li Continuous Locational Marginal Pricing (CLMP) , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[4]  Christian Ibars,et al.  Distributed Demand Management in Smart Grid with a Congestion Game , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[5]  H. Kalven,et al.  The Uneasy Case For Progressive Taxation , 1954 .

[6]  Thomas Morstyn,et al.  Matching Markets with Contracts for Electric Vehicle Smart Charging , 2018, 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[7]  Johann L. Hurink,et al.  Pricing Mechanism Based on Losses Using Grid Topology , 2019, 2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech.

[8]  Abhijit R. Abhyankar,et al.  Loss allocation of radial distribution system using Shapley value: A sequential approach , 2017 .

[9]  Na Li,et al.  Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[10]  Hans-Arno Jacobsen,et al.  Distributed Convex Optimization for Electric Vehicle Aggregators , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  Hamed Mohsenian Rad,et al.  Optimal Residential Load Control With Price Prediction in Real-Time Electricity Pricing Environments , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Gerwin Hoogsteen,et al.  A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective on Decentralized Energy Management , 2017 .

[13]  Gerard J. M. Smit,et al.  Demand side management using profile steering , 2015, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech.

[14]  B. V. Vliet,et al.  Households as change agents in a Dutch smart energy transition: On power, privacy and participation , 2015 .

[15]  Douglas N. Jones,et al.  The Fairness Criterion in Public Utility Regulation: Does Fairness Still Matter? , 2001 .

[16]  Wayes Tushar,et al.  Collaborative Energy Management for a Residential Community: A Non-Cooperative and Evolutionary Approach , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence.

[17]  M.D. Anderson,et al.  Dynamic pricing [of electricity] , 2000, IEEE Potentials.

[18]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management , 2014 .

[19]  Thomas Morstyn,et al.  Multiclass Energy Management for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Driven by Prosumer Preferences , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Augusto Casaca,et al.  Balancing energy production and consumption in energy efficient neighborhoods , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON).

[21]  George Huitema,et al.  The Neglected Consumer: The Case of the Smart Meter Rollout in the Netherlands , 2011 .

[22]  Marco E. T. Gerards,et al.  Testing grid-based electricity prices and batteries in a field test , 2018 .

[23]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[24]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Demand response and smart grids—A survey , 2014 .

[25]  Gesche M. Huebner,et al.  Public acceptability of domestic demand-side response in Great Britain: The role of automation and direct load control , 2015 .

[26]  Jessica Stromback,et al.  The potential of smart meter enabled programs to increase energy and systems efficiency: a mass pilot comparison Short name: Empower Demand , 2011 .

[27]  Frank Hindriks,et al.  Assessing fairness of dynamic grid tariffs , 2017 .

[28]  B. Sovacool What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .