Rami Comminution Is Associated With Displacement of Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Injuries on Lateral Stress Radiographs

Objectives: To determine whether displacement on lateral stress radiographs (LSRs) in patients with minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries is associated with any demographic and/or injury characteristics. Design: Retrospective comparative cohort. Setting: Urban level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: Ninety-three consecutive patients with minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 injuries. Intervention: Displacement of pelvic ring injury on LSR (≥10 mm vs. <10 mm). Main Outcome Measurements: Demographic and injury characteristics (mechanism of injury, Nakatani rami classification, rami comminution, Denis zone, complete/incomplete sacral fracture, sacral comminution). Results: 65.6% of patients (n = 61) had ≥10 mm of displacement on LSR. On univariate analysis, displacement was associated with increased age [median difference 11: confidence interval (CI), 2–23], female sex [proportional difference (PD): 25.1%, CI, 3.9%–44.4%], Nakatani classification (type I PD: 27.9%, type II PD: −19.5%), and rami comminution (PD: 55.6%, CI, 35.4%–71.3%). On multivariate analysis, displacement was only associated with rami comminution (odds ratio: 16.48, CI, 4.67–58.17). Displacement was not associated with energy of injury mechanism, sacral fracture Denis zone, complete sacral fracture, sacral comminution, or bilateral rami fractures. Conclusions: Although rami comminution was the only variable found to be independently associated with displacement ≥10 mm on LSR, no single variable perfectly predicted displacement. Future studies are needed to determine whether displacement on stress radiographs should change the management of these injuries. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  C. Mauffrey,et al.  Unstable minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries have a similar hospital course as intertrochanteric femur fractures. , 2021, Injury.

[2]  C. Mauffrey,et al.  Nonoperative Management of Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries With and Without Occult Instability , 2021, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[3]  Michael M. Hadeed,et al.  Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries: a spectrum of fracture types and treatment algorithms , 2021, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[4]  C. Mauffrey,et al.  Sacral Fracture Completeness in Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries Has Weak Interobserver Reliability , 2021, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[5]  R. O’Toole,et al.  A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Surgical Fixation Versus Nonoperative Management of Minimally Displaced Complete Lateral Compression Pelvis Fractures , 2021, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[6]  C. Mauffrey,et al.  Mobilization versus displacement on lateral stress radiographs for determining operative fixation of minimally displaced lateral compression type I (LC1) pelvic ring injuries , 2021, International Orthopaedics.

[7]  C. Mauffrey,et al.  Standardizing statistics and data reporting in orthopaedic research , 2021, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[8]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  An international survey of pelvic trauma surgeons on the management of pelvic ring injuries. , 2020, Injury.

[9]  C. Mauffrey,et al.  The Lateral Stress Radiograph Identifies Occult Instability of Lateral Compression Pelvic Ring Injuries Without Sedation. , 2020, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[10]  H. Sagi,et al.  Negative Stress Examination Under Anesthesia Reliably Predicts Pelvic Ring Union Without Displacement , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[11]  R. O’Toole,et al.  Nonoperative Treatment of Intermediate Severity Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries With Minimally Displaced Complete Sacral Fracture , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  P. Tornetta,et al.  Nonoperative Immediate Weightbearing of Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Sacral Fractures Does Not Result in Displacement , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[13]  M. Weaver,et al.  What Are the Patterns of Injury and Displacement Seen in Lateral Compression Pelvic Fractures? , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  H. Sagi,et al.  Examination Under Anesthetic for Occult Pelvic Ring Instability , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[15]  S. Sims,et al.  OTA Highlight Paper Predicting Future Displacement of Nonoperatively Managed Lateral Compression Sacral Fractures: Can It Be Done? , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[16]  M. Hardisty,et al.  Lateral compression fracture of the pelvis represents a heterogeneous group of complex 3D patterns of displacement. , 2006, Injury.

[17]  Jeremy W. R. Young,et al.  Radiologic Management of Pelvic Ring Fractures: Systematic Radiographic Diagnosis , 1987 .

[18]  Jeremy W. R. Young,et al.  Lateral compression fractures of the pelvis: The importance of plain radiographs in the diagnosis and surgical management , 1986, Skeletal Radiology.

[19]  M. Tile The Pelvis: A Tribute to George F. Pennal , 1980 .

[20]  J P Waddell,et al.  Pelvic disruption: assessment and classification. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  E. Hannan,et al.  Invited commentary. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  M Tile,et al.  Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed? , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.