Quality of Agroecological Matrix in a Tropical Montane Landscape: Ants in Coffee Plantations in Southern Mexico

Abstract: Conservation efforts in fragmented landscapes frequently focus on characteristics of the habitat fragments. We propose that the matrix within which habitat fragments occur is of equal importance and focus on quality of the matrix as an interesting variable. We studied ground‐foraging ants in isolated montane forest fragments in the matrix of coffee agroecosystems of southwestern Chiapas, Mexico. We sampled the ants, with tuna fish as bait, in plots at various distances from a forest fragment (2–750 m) on two farms, one an organic farm with considerable shade, the other a conventional farm with only spotty shade. Each plot contained a grid of 49 ( 7 × 7) or 100 (10 × 10) baits. The species richness of ground‐foraging ants was not significantly different between the forest fragment and the high‐quality matrix, but it was significantly lower in the low‐quality matrix than in the forest. Furthermore, species richness decreased with distance from the forest fragment in both matrix types. However, the rate of decrease in species richness was greater in the conventional farm (  poor‐quality matrix) than in the organic farm (  high‐quality matrix), suggesting that the quality of the agricultural matrix is important for the conservation of ant diversity.

[1]  W. Heyer,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. , 1995 .

[2]  R. Greenberg,et al.  Bird Populations in Rustic and Planted Shade Coffee Plantations of Eastern Chiapas, México , 1997 .

[3]  R. Reitsma,et al.  Bird Populations in Shade and Sun Coffee Plantations in Central Guatemala , 1997 .

[4]  J. Vandermeer,et al.  The Agroecosystem: A Need for the Conservation Biologist’s Lens , 1997 .

[5]  J. Majer Ants: Bio-indicators of minesite rehabilitation, land-use, and land conservation , 1983 .

[6]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization , 1996 .

[7]  J. Franklin Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes? , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  I. Perfecto,et al.  Biodiversity and the Transformation of a Tropical Agroecosystem: Ants in Coffee Plantations , 1995 .

[9]  P. Beier,et al.  Do Habitat Corridors Provide Connectivity? , 1998 .

[10]  L. Hansson,et al.  Dispersal and connectivity in metapopulations , 1991 .

[11]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single‐species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations , 1991 .

[12]  E. Jules History and biological consequences of forest fragmentation: A study of Trillium ovatum in southwestern Oregon. , 1997 .

[13]  S. Levings Seasonal, Annual, and Among-site Variation in the Ground Ant Community of a Deciduous Tropical Forest: Some Causes of Patchy Species Distributions , 1983 .

[14]  G. Powell,et al.  Conservation Biology for the Biodiversity Crisis , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  W. Laurance Ecological Correlates of Extinction Proneness in Australian Tropical Rain Forest Mammals , 1991 .

[16]  Valerie Kapos,et al.  The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments A prospective comparison of fragments and continuous forest , 1992 .

[17]  I. Perfecto Dynamics of Solenopsis geminata in a tropical fallow field after ploughing , 1991 .

[18]  R. Rice,et al.  Shade Coffee: A Disappearing Refuge for Biodiversity Shade coffee plantations can contain as much biodiversity as forest habitats , 1996 .

[19]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[20]  J. Read Use of ants to monitor environmental impacts of salt spray from a mine in arid Australia , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[21]  Kazuo Nakamura A model of the functional response of a predator to prey density involving the hunger effect , 1974, Oecologia.

[22]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  R. Hobbs The role of corridors in conservation: Solution or bandwagon? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  R. Noss Corridors in Real Landscapes: A Reply to Simberloff and Cox , 1987 .

[25]  J. Vandermeer,et al.  Comparison of Species Richness for Stream-Inhabiting Insects in Tropical and Mid-Latitude Streams , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[26]  W. Fagan,et al.  Competitive reversals inside ecological reserves: the role of external habitat degradation , 1998, Journal of mathematical biology.

[27]  R. Rice The land use patterns and the history of coffee in eastern Chiapas, Mexico , 1997 .

[28]  James A. Cox,et al.  Consequences and Costs of Conservation Corridors , 1987 .

[29]  Víctor M. Toledo,et al.  Biodiversity Conservation in Traditional Coffee Systems of Mexico , 1999 .

[30]  K. Burnham,et al.  Robust Estimation of Population Size When Capture Probabilities Vary Among Animals , 1979 .

[31]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[32]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single-Species Spatial Dynamics May Contribute to Long-Term Rarity and Commonness , 1985 .

[33]  I. Perfecto Foraging behavior as a determinant of asymmetric competitive interaction between two ant species in a tropical agroecosystem , 1994, Oecologia.

[34]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology , 1993 .

[35]  J. Swenson,et al.  The effect of matrix on the occurrence of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in isolated habitat fragments , 1995, Oecologia.