Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks

Techniques recently developed for the analysis of human social networks are applied to the social network of bottlenose dolphins living in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. We identify communities and subcommunities within the dolphin population and present evidence that sex– and age–related homophily play a role in the formation of clusters of preferred companionship. We also identify brokers who act as links between sub–communities and who appear to be crucial to the social cohesion of the population as a whole. The network is found to be similar to human social networks in some respects but different in some others, such as the level of assortative mixing by degree within the population. This difference elucidates some of the means by which the network forms and evolves.

[1]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[2]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[3]  Randall S. Wells,et al.  The Social Structure of Free-Ranging Bottlenose Dolphins , 1987 .

[4]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[5]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Models for network evolution , 1996 .

[7]  J. Mann,et al.  Social evolution in toothed whales. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  R. Connor,et al.  Superalliance of bottlenose dolphins , 1999, Nature.

[9]  Reka Albert,et al.  Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks , 1999 .

[10]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[11]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Structure of growing networks with preferential linking. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[12]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Integrating behaviour into wildlife conservation: the multiple ways that behaviour can reduce Ne , 2000 .

[13]  S. Redner,et al.  Connectivity of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[14]  S. Durant,et al.  Matriarchs As Repositories of Social Knowledge in African Elephants , 2001, Science.

[15]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Emergence of a small world from local interactions: modeling acquaintance networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[17]  M E J Newman.  Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[18]  J. Mitani,et al.  Recent developments in the study of wild chimpanzee behavior , 2002 .

[19]  Hawoong Jeong,et al.  Classification of scale-free networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Beom Jun Kim,et al.  Attack vulnerability of complex networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  David Lusseau,et al.  The emergent properties of a dolphin social network , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  D. Lusseau,et al.  The bottlenose dolphin community of Doubtful Sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.