Preferences for shared automated vehicles: A hybrid latent class modeling approach

Abstract We model the mode choice between three novel emerging transportation services and identify latent market segments not studied yet in the context of shared automated vehicles, including ridesharing, car sharing and automated transit, using a hybrid choice model. We use a discrete distribution to capture taste heterogeneity of distinct latent classes. Latent variables, socio-demographics and travel habits inform latent class assignment estimated simultaneously with a discrete choice kernel. Respondents chose their preferred mode for going to work in a set of stated preference choice tasks, based on the attributes of their current commutes using a Bayesian D-Efficient design. Users were segmented into two latent classes based on latent factors that capture time style orientation and public transit dislike. The effects of seating designation, not modeled previously in this context, trip cost and travel times in a shared ride, were estimated for the two classes. Users who neither like transit nor ridesharing with strangers are less likely to choose a shared ride if their designated seat is the middle seat, and overall less likely to choose automated transit. Individuals who have more organized time styles demonstrate higher marginal sensitivity to travel times and costs and are more likely to choose automated transit. Value of time analysis reveals that wait time of services that offer a convenient home pickup is valued lower than in-vehicle time. The implications for future adoption of shared automated vehicles is further discussed.

[1]  Jean-Claude Usunier,et al.  The Time Styles Scale , 2007 .

[2]  J. Dargay The Effect Of Income On Car Ownership: Evidence Of Asymmetry , 2001 .

[3]  H. Kato META-ANALYSIS OF VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS: EVIDENCE FROM JAPAN , 2010 .

[4]  Geert Wets,et al.  Traffic accident segmentation by means of latent class clustering. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[6]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  MIMIC models, formative indicators and the joys of research , 2013 .

[7]  Jishnu Narayan,et al.  Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges , 2017 .

[8]  G. Cruces,et al.  Biased Perceptions of Income Distribution and Preferences for Redistribution: Evidence from a Survey Experiment , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  John M. Rose,et al.  Hypothetical bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it? , 2014 .

[10]  N. Lustig,et al.  The rich underreport their income: Assessing bias in inequality estimates and correction methods using linked survey and tax data , 2018 .

[11]  Eran Ben-Elia,et al.  Emergence of cooperation in congested road networks using ICT and future and emerging technologies: A game-based review , 2016 .

[12]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  Clusters of potential autonomous vehicles users according to propensity to use individual versus shared vehicles , 2019, Transport Policy.

[13]  B P O'Connor,et al.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al.  Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. , 2003 .

[15]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[16]  Wilco Burghout,et al.  Impacts of Shared Autonomous Taxis in a Metropolitan Area , 2015 .

[17]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  A hybrid-choice latent-class model for the analysis of the effects of weather on cycling demand , 2015 .

[18]  Rui Portocarrero Sarmento,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis - A Case study , 2019, ArXiv.

[19]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling , 2018, Transport Reviews.

[20]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Integrating psychometric indicators in latent class choice models , 2014 .

[21]  Jean-Claude Usunier,et al.  Time Styles and the Waiting Experience , 1999 .

[22]  K. Taber The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education , 2017, Research in Science Education.

[23]  Scott Hardman,et al.  How do drivers use automation? Insights from a survey of partially automated vehicle owners in the United States , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[24]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles , 2017, Transportation.

[25]  R. Daziano,et al.  Individual-specific point and interval conditional estimates of latent class logit parameters , 2017, Journal of Choice Modelling.

[26]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Identifying user classes for shared and automated mobility services , 2020, European Transport Research Review.

[27]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  Valuation of Travel Time , 2012 .

[28]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle , 2013 .

[29]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  Multinomial Logit Models with Continuous and Discrete Individual Heterogeneity in R: The gmnl Package , 2017 .

[30]  Christos Gkartzonikas,et al.  What have we learned? A review of stated preference and choice studies on autonomous vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[31]  Felipe F. Dias,et al.  Modeling Individual Preferences for Ownership and Sharing of Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2017 .

[32]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles , 2017 .

[33]  Bilal Farooq,et al.  Virtual Immersive Reality for Stated Preference Travel Behavior Experiments: A Case Study of Autonomous Vehicles on Urban Roads , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[34]  C. Bhat,et al.  Modeling individuals’ willingness to share trips with strangers in an autonomous vehicle future , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[35]  Stelios N. Neophytou,et al.  Modeling Cross-National Differences in Automated Vehicle Acceptance , 2020, Sustainability.

[36]  Joseph M. Stanford,et al.  Assessing the long-term effects of autonomous vehicles: a speculative approach , 2016 .

[37]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .

[38]  Germán Escovar Álvarez,et al.  To Share or Not to Share , 2017 .

[39]  F. Lescaroux Car Ownership in Relation to Income Distribution and Consumers' Spending Decisions , 2010 .

[40]  Krishna M. Gurumurthy,et al.  Modeling Americans’ autonomous vehicle preferences: A focus on dynamic ride-sharing, privacy & long-distance mode choices , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[41]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  D-efficient or deficient? A robustness analysis of stated choice experimental designs , 2017 .

[42]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  Identifying latent mode-use propensity segments in an all-AV era , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[43]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Analyzing the dynamic ride-sharing potential for shared autonomous vehicle fleets using cellphone data from Orlando, Florida , 2018, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..