Ants acknowledge information to control its rate of transfer

Signals whose function is solely to coordinate communication are so far known only in human conversations1 and telecommunication networks2. Utterances like "mm-hmm"3, gestures such as the nodding of ones head, or "ACK" packets used in Internet protocols to confirm the reception of a message4 all coordinate communication. Rather than carrying domain-specific information5-7, these signals are generic acknowledgements used by receivers to control the flow of sender information when the rate of information transfer could possibly be overwhelming. Here, we show the first evidence of the use of acknowledgements to control information transfer rates outside human society. Quantitative comparison of information flows between sender-receiver pairs demonstrates that acknowledgements are used by pairs of ants during tandem running8,9--a social behaviour where the sender facilitates the receivers intake of navigational information--but not by pairs of termites that also tandem run10,11 to maintain cohesion but not to share large amounts of information. Our analysis provides a quantitative framework for identifying in other animal taxa hidden patterns of information flow with implications for uncovering cryptic signals within complex communication behaviours that are still poorly understood12,13.

[1]  Rajbir Kaur,et al.  Characterization of recruitment through tandem running in an Indian queenless ant Diacamma indicum , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[2]  M. M�glich,et al.  Tandem Calling: A New Kind of Signal in Ant Communication , 1974, Science.

[3]  M. Gahr,et al.  Tap dancing birds: the multimodal mutual courtship display of males and females in a socially monogamous songbird , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Nihat Ay,et al.  Robustness and complexity co-constructed in multimodal signalling networks , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Gail Jefferson,et al.  Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “Yeah”; and “Mm Hm”; , 1984 .

[6]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[7]  Ana B Sendova-Franks,et al.  Ants determine their next move at rest: motor planning and causality in complex systems , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[8]  E. L. Franklin The journey of tandem running: the twists, turns and what we have learned , 2013, Insectes Sociaux.

[9]  P. Marler,et al.  Communication Goes Multimodal , 1999, Science.

[10]  S. Dobata,et al.  Adaptive switch to sexually dimorphic movements by partner-seeking termites , 2018, Science Advances.

[11]  Robert E. Kahn,et al.  A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication , 1974 .

[12]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Colony size, communication and ant foraging strategy , 1989 .

[13]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[14]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Inferring causal relationships in zebrafish-robot interactions through transfer entropy: a small lure to catch a big fish. , 2018, Animal Behavior and Cognition.

[15]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Blinkered teaching: tandem running by visually impaired ants , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  W. H. Whitcomb,et al.  Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. , 1970 .

[17]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Preliminaries to Preliminaries: “Can I Ask You a Question?” , 1980 .

[18]  Michael Levin,et al.  Inform: Efficient Information-Theoretic Analysis of Collective Behaviors , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[19]  E. Vargo,et al.  Biology of subterranean termites: insights from molecular studies of Reticulitermes and Coptotermes. , 2009, Annual review of entomology.

[20]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Visually Mediated Motor Planning in the Escape Response of Drosophila , 2008, Current Biology.

[21]  Albert Y. Zomaya,et al.  Local information transfer as a spatiotemporal filter for complex systems. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Kobin H. Kendrick,et al.  Taking turns: bridging the gap between human and animal communication , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  W. L. Nutting,et al.  8 – Flight and Colony Foundation* , 1969 .

[24]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Teaching in tandem-running ants , 2006, Nature.

[25]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[26]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[28]  Ana B Sendova-Franks,et al.  Ant search strategies after interrupted tandem runs , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  Mikhail Prokopenko,et al.  Differentiating information transfer and causal effect , 2008, 0812.4373.

[30]  T. Seeley Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony's nutritional status , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  J. Flack Animal Communication: Hidden Complexity , 2013, Current Biology.

[32]  K. Laland,et al.  Lessons from animal teaching. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  Osamu Yamanaka,et al.  UMATracker: an intuitive image-based tracking platform , 2018, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[34]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Teaching with Evaluation in Ants , 2007, Current Biology.

[35]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  The Use of Edges in Visual Navigation by the Ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001 .

[36]  Balaji Prabhakar,et al.  The Regulation of Ant Colony Foraging Activity without Spatial Information , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[38]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  Internet congestion control , 2002 .