Promoting partnerships: challenges for the internet age

The internet is transforming health care. It is creating a new conduit not only for communication but also in the access, sharing, and exchange of information among people and machines. Although it is impossible to predict its evolution, recent developments indicate that the internet will have a profound effect on the way that patients and clinicians interact. It will also foster a new level of knowledge among patients, enable them to have input into making decisions about their health care, and allow them to participate in active partnerships with many groups of decision makers such as clinicians, policymakers, and researchers. This article describes the 10 key challenges that must be met to allow optimal partnerships to develop between patients and clinicians. This list of challenges, which is by no means comprehensive, is intended to stimulate discussion of the issues that require immediate attention to maximise the potential benefits of the internet for health care. Access to technology and information must be equitably distributed. #### Summary points The internet provides opportunities to build strong partnerships between patients and clinicians There should be more collaboration between consumer groups and professional organisations To be effective, information systems must be easy to access and use and must provide rapid access to appropriate information There needs to be better integration of information and the values of the people making decisions about their healthcare needs In the internet era it is important for patients and clinicians to work together as partners. However, there is little evidence in the peer reviewed literature that we are moving beyond the political correctness of stating these sentiments. A search of Medline, CINAHL, and Healthstar from the year of the first issue to May 1999 and of the Cochrane Library's first issue for 1999 using the terms “consumer or public or patient” and “Internet …

[1]  M D Hagen,et al.  The utility of electronic mail as a medium for patient-physician communication. , 1994, Archives of family medicine.

[2]  A. R. Spielberg,et al.  On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  K W Goodman The issues and forces that shape informatics. , 1999, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[4]  G R Norman,et al.  Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine) skills: a critical appraisal. , 1998, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[5]  E. Coiera,et al.  The Internet's challenge to health care provision , 1996, BMJ.

[6]  Richard A Spinello,et al.  The end of privacy. , 1997, America.

[7]  Richard E. Nisbett,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement , 1981 .

[8]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[9]  Joseph Finkelstein,et al.  Patients' acceptance of Internet-based home asthma telemonitoring , 1998, AMIA.

[10]  Paul Kim,et al.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review , 1999, BMJ.

[11]  Khan Mk,et al.  Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. , 1999, JAMA.

[12]  M. Frisse What is the Internet learning about you while you are learning about the Internet? , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  A R Jadad,et al.  The new alchemy: transmuting information into knowledge in an electronic age. , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[14]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  D. A. Tong,et al.  Requests for medical advice from patients and families to health care providers who publish on the World Wide Web. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  A. Jadad Randomised Controlled Trials: A User's Guide , 1998 .

[17]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Information in practice Towards quality management of medical information on the internet : evaluation , labelling , and filtering of information , 1998 .

[18]  W Hersh,et al.  "A world of knowledge at your fingertips": the promise, reality, and future directions of on-line information retrieval. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[19]  J. Smith "Internet patients" turn to support groups to guide medical decisions. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  J W Goldwein,et al.  Technical and editorial administration of a World-Wide-Web site during a period of rapid growth: the OncoLink experience. , 1996, Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium.

[21]  Ebm Notebook,et al.  Transferring evidence from research into practice: 1. The role of clinical care research evidence in clinical decisions , 1996, ACP Journal Club.

[22]  R. Haynes,et al.  What's up in medical informatics? , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[23]  Ingrid Burbey Ubiquitous Internet computing , 1998 .

[24]  F Gerr,et al.  Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board. , 1997, Journal of general internal medicine.

[25]  Felix Stalder,et al.  The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence , 2001, CSOC.