Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Experience on 60 Cases

Introduction Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is still one of the more challenging procedures in urology. Minimizing warm ischemia time (WIT) and bleeding requires efficient intracorporeal suturing. In addition, achieving negative surgical margins requires complete excision of the tumor. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RALPN) adds the advantages offered by the “Da Vinci system” to laparoscopy, such as the 3-D vision, and the better degree of freedom of surgical instruments. Objective The objective of this study is to report our experience with RALPN. Methods From August 2009 to October 2012, 60 patients underwent RALPN for kidney cancer. The average age of the patients (35 female, 25 male) was 63 (range 48–80) years. Average BMI was 25 (range 21.8–29.7) kg/m2. Average tumor size was 3.2 cm (range 2-6.7 cm). All the procedures were performed by a transperitoneal approach, liar clamping was used in all cases: in 47 patients by one intracorporeal tourniquet for the artery and one for the vein; in three cases, ilar clamping was “en block” by Satinsky. Results Mean operative time was 167.2 min (140–250) with a WIT of 23.8 min (15–28). The mean estimated blood loss was 260 mL (50–300). In one case, nephrectomy was necessary because the tumor involved the renal pedicle. One patient had pulmonary embolism and one urinary leakage conservatively managed. Pathologic examination revealed clear cell renal cell carcinoma in 58 patients, oncocytoma in one patient, and angiomyolipoma in one patient. All resection margins were free from tumor. Conclusions Partial nephrectomy, facilitated by robotic technology, is more and more frequently performed as a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure.

[1]  Georges-Pascal Haber,et al.  Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for completely endophytic renal masses: a single institution experience , 2014, BJU international.

[2]  Steven L. Chang,et al.  Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. , 2013, Journal of endourology.

[3]  I. Tuerk,et al.  Single surgeon's experience with laparoscopic versus robotic partial nephrectomy: perioperative outcomes/complications and influence of tumor characteristics on choice of therapy. , 2012, The Canadian journal of urology.

[4]  P. Pierorazio,et al.  Comparative analysis of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy techniques in the treatment of localized renal tumors. , 2012, Urology.

[5]  T. Guzzo,et al.  Advancements in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Expanding the Feasibility of Nephron-Sparing , 2012, Advances in urology.

[6]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Complications after robotic partial nephrectomy at centers of excellence: multi-institutional analysis of 450 cases. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[7]  A. Moinzadeh,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon's initial experience. , 2010, The Canadian journal of urology.

[8]  M. Marberger,et al.  Focal therapy and imaging in prostate and kidney cancer: high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of small renal tumors. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[9]  K. Bensalah,et al.  Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. , 2010, European urology.

[10]  Steven Joniau,et al.  Current status of minimally invasive ablative techniques in the treatment of small renal tumours. , 2007, European urology.

[11]  B. Pasche A new strategy in the war on renal cell cancer: hitting multiple targets with limited collateral damage. , 2006, JAMA.

[12]  I. Gill,et al.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor. , 2005, Urology.

[13]  Georg Bartsch,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. , 2004, Urology.

[14]  I. Frank,et al.  Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as safe alternative to invasive therapy. , 2004, Urology.

[15]  Jacques Tostain,et al.  Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[16]  A. Belldegrun,et al.  Laparoscopic and percutaneous ablative techniques in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. , 2002, Reviews in urology.

[17]  A. Belldegrun,et al.  The changing natural history of renal cell carcinoma. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[18]  L. Baert,et al.  Incidental renal cell carcinoma and nephron sparing surgery , 2001, Current opinion in urology.

[19]  A. Belldegrun,et al.  Incidental renal tumors. , 2000, Urology.

[20]  A. Novick,et al.  Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. , 1998, The Journal of urology.