Self-Reinforcing Dominance Interactions Between Virtual Males and Females. Hypothesis Generation for Primate Studies

Although in group-living primates an individual's dominance position is a consequence of its social skills with both sexes, there are few data and hardly any theory on male-female dominance relationships. In order to stimulate a systematic study on this topic, I present a simple individual- oriented model on inter-sexual dominance and how it is influenced by species characteristics of primates, such as intensity of aggression and sex ratio. The model represents a virtual world inhab ited by entities that do nothing except grouping and performing dominance interactions in which the effects of winning and losing are self-reinforcing. VirtualMales start out with a higher winning tendency and are characterized by a higher intensity of aggression than VirtualFemales. To ensure comparability to behavioral patterns of real animals, I record the same behavioral aspects of the artificial entities as have been collected for real primates. Results show that due to the high impact of acts in fiercely aggressive VirtualSpecies, the variation in dominance values is larger than in mild ones. As a consequence, the rank of the most subordinate VirtualMale is lower than that of the lowest-ranking mild VirtualMale and, counter-intuitively, VirtualMales dominate relatively fewer VirtualFemales in fierce than mild species. Correspondence of model results to findings on primates allows us to use insight obtained from the model to derive hypotheses on the relation between intensity of aggression, sex ratio, male mounting behavior and female choice of primates.

[1]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Risk sensitive and ambiguity reducing dominance interactions in a virtual laboratory , 1998 .

[3]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Spatial Centrality of Dominants Without Positional Preference , 1998 .

[4]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Philopatry, male presence and grooming reciprocation among female primates: a comparative perspective , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  Steven Durlauf Growing artificial societies , 1997, Complex..

[6]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Cooperation Without Genes, Games Or Cognition , 1997 .

[7]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[8]  Jane Goodall,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Minds , 1996 .

[9]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies , 1996 .

[10]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Reciprocation in apes: from complex cognition to self-structuring , 1996 .

[11]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing artificial societies , 1996 .

[12]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Dominance interactions, spatial dynamics and emergent reciprocity in a virtual world , 1996 .

[13]  Lee Ellis,et al.  Reproductive and interpersonal aspects of dominance and status , 1996 .

[14]  I. Chase,et al.  Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning?. , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  F Villa,et al.  New computer architectures as tools for ecological thought. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  S. B. Datta,et al.  Effects of Group Demography on Dominance Relationships Among Female Primates. I. Mother-Daughter and Sister-Sister Relations , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group level , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  A matrix partial correlation test used in investigations of reciprocity and other social interaction patterns at group level , 1990 .

[20]  F. D. de Waal,et al.  Toward a comparative socioecology of the genus Macaca: Different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptail monkeys , 1989, American journal of primatology.

[21]  P. Klopfer,et al.  Perspectives in Ethology , 1973, Springer US.

[22]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Mirror Beyond Mirror: Puddles of Life , 1987, ALIFE.

[23]  L. Hubert Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis , 1986 .

[24]  J. Caldecott,et al.  Mating patterns, societies and the ecogeography of macaques , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Newton H. Copp,et al.  DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES IN THE CRAYFISH PROCAMBARUS CLARKII (GIRARD, 1852) AND THE QUESTION OF LEARNED INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION (DECAPODA, ASTACIDEA) , 1986 .

[26]  Carolyn L. Ehardt,et al.  Intragroup agonistic behavior in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) , 1985 .

[27]  C. Barnard,et al.  Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of "individual recognition". , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Primate ecology and human origins : ecological influences on social organization , 1979 .

[29]  G. Parker,et al.  Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Dominance and sexual behavior: a hypothesis. , 1974, The American journal of psychiatry.

[31]  I. T. Draper INFLUENCE OF HORMONES ON THE NERVOUS SYSTEM , 1973 .

[32]  L. Rosenblum,et al.  The Ontogeny of Sexual Behavior in Male Bonnet Macaques1 , 1971 .

[33]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.