Technological Determinism and Modularity: Lessons from a Comparison between Aircraft and Auto Industries in Europe

Initial studies of modular manufacturing processes have shown that this dominant design required a fundamentally novel organisational structure of the industries. The underlying hypothesis of technological determinism merits a deeper exploration. The first part of the present paper aims at presenting the logic of this argument while making a distinction between the technological and organisational aspects of modularity. Based on this we then attempt a study of the manner in which the transition to modularity takes place in the aircraft and automobile industries. Our main conclusion is that while it may be possible to posit a convergence between these two industries, the paths followed are still quite clearly opposed.

[1]  David Robertson,et al.  Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry , 1992 .

[2]  R. Boyer,et al.  Between imitation and innovation : the transfer and hybridization of productive models in the international automobile industry , 1998 .

[3]  Jean Jacques Chanaron,et al.  Implementing technological and organisational innovations and management of core competencies: lessons from the automotive industry , 2000 .

[4]  F. Salvadora,et al.  Modularity , product variety , production volume , and component sourcing : theorizing beyond generic prescriptions , 2002 .

[5]  D. Talbot,et al.  Institutional Dynamics and Localized Inter-Firm Relations , 2000 .

[6]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[7]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Competition Through Institutional Form: The Case of Cluster Tool Standards , 2004 .

[8]  Vincent Frigant.  Vanishing hand versus Systems integrators - Une revue de la littérature sur l'impact organisationnel de la modularité , 2005 .

[9]  Blanche Segrestin,et al.  The role of design regimes in the coordination of competencies and the conditions for inter-firm cooperation , 2002 .

[10]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[11]  Giuseppe Volpato,et al.  Redesigning the Automakers-suppliers Relationship in the Automotive Industry , 2002 .

[12]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Modularization in the Auto Industry: Interlinked Multiple Hierarchies of Product, Production, and Supplier Systems , 2001 .

[13]  François Fourcade,et al.  Modularisation in the auto industry: can manufacturer's architectural strategies meet supplier's sustainable profit trajectories? , 2004 .

[14]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  From knowledge management to design‐oriented organisations , 2002 .

[15]  Consumer vs. Manufacturer or Consumer vs. Consumer? The Implications of a Usage Analysis of Automobile Systems , 2002 .

[16]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Limits to Modularity: Reflections on Recent Developments in Chip Design , 2005 .

[17]  Andrea Prencipe,et al.  The Business of Systems Integration , 2004 .

[18]  R. Langlois.  The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism , 2001 .

[19]  Sean P Mcalinden,et al.  Michigan Automotive Partnership Research Memorandum No. 1 The Future of Modular Automotive Systems: Where are the Economic Efficiencies in the Modular-Assembly Concept? , 2000 .

[20]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  The long term evolution of vertically-related industries , 2001 .

[21]  Y. Lung,et al.  L'économie de l'automobile , 1995 .

[22]  M. Freyssenet.  One best way? : trajectories and industrial models of the world's automobile producers , 1998 .

[23]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular architectures, knowledge assets and organisational learning: new management processes for product creation , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[24]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[25]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Specialisation and Systems Integration: Where Manufacture and Services Still Meet , 2003 .

[26]  Freek Erens,et al.  Architectures for product families , 1997 .

[27]  F. Veloso,et al.  Make-Buy Decisions in the Auto Industry: New Perspectives on the Role of the Supplier as an Innovator , 2001 .

[28]  Scott Schaefer,et al.  Product design partitions with complementary components , 1999 .

[29]  K. Frenken.  A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909-1997) , 2000 .

[30]  Jean Nollet,et al.  Issues on partnering: evidences from subcontracting in aeronautics , 2001 .

[31]  Yannick Lung,et al.  The Challenges of the European Automotive Industry at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Summary of the main findings of the CoCKEAS project , 2004 .

[32]  Vincent Frigant,et al.  Geographical proximity and supplying relationships in modular production , 2002 .

[33]  S. Brusoni,et al.  Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .

[34]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[35]  Mario Sergio Salerno,et al.  The characteristics and the role of modularity in the automotive business , 2001 .

[36]  A. Prencipe.  Corporate Strategy and Systems Integration Capabilities: Managing Networks in Complex Systems Industries , 2003 .

[37]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[38]  G. Volpato,et al.  The OEM-FTS relationship in automotive industry , 2004 .

[39]  Peter Galvin,et al.  MODULARITY ON INDUSTRY STRUCTURE: THE CASE OF THE WORLD THE EFFECT OF PRODUCT BICYCLE INDUSTRY , 2001 .

[40]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  System sourcing—opportunities and problems , 2002 .

[41]  Yannick Lung.  The Challenges of the European Automotive Industry at the Beginning of the 21stCentury , 2004 .

[42]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Antidotes for high complexity and ambiguity in software development , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[43]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[44]  R. Langlois.  Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .