A Thing of Beauty: Steering Behavior in an Interactive Playground

Interactive playgrounds are spaces where players engage in collocated, playful activities, in which added digital technology can be designed to promote cognitive, social, and motor skills development. To promote such development, different strategies can be used to implement game mechanics that change player's in-game behavior. One of such strategies is enticing players to take action through incentives akin to game achievements. We explored if this strategy could be used to influence players' proxemic behavior in the Interactive Tag Playground, an installation that enhances the traditional game of tag. We placed the ITP in an art gallery, observed hundreds of play sessions, and refined the mechanics, which consisted in projecting collectible particles around the tagger that upon collection by runners resulted only in the embellishment of their circles. We implemented the refined mechanics in a study with 48 children. The playground automatically collected the players' positions, and analyses show that runners got closer to and moved more towards taggers when using our enticing strategy. This suggests an enticing strategy can be used to influence physical in-game behavior.

[1]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[2]  Nicolai Marquardt,et al.  Proxemic interactions: the new ubicomp? , 2011, INTR.

[3]  Susanne Boll,et al.  Proxemics play: understanding proxemics for designing digital play experiences , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[4]  Robby van Delden,et al.  Interactive Playgrounds for Children , 2014 .

[5]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Yellow is Mine! : designing interactive playgrounds based on traditional childrens play , 2014 .

[6]  Rob Tieben,et al.  Curiosity and interaction: making people curious through interactive systems , 2011, BCS HCI.

[7]  Janienke Sturm,et al.  Playful interactions stimulating physical activity in public spaces , 2013, CHI 2013.

[8]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Steering user behavior with badges , 2013, WWW.

[9]  Georgios N. Yannakakis,et al.  Entertainment capture through heart rate activity in physical interactive playgrounds , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[10]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces , 2003, INTERACT.

[11]  Narcís Parés,et al.  Massive flux design for an interactive water installation: water games , 2005, ACE '05.

[12]  Jesse Schell,et al.  The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses , 2019 .

[13]  Robert Zubek,et al.  MDA : A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research , 2004 .

[14]  Berry Eggen,et al.  Designing playful interactions for social interaction and physical play , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[15]  Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze,et al.  Evaluating Exertion Games , 2010, Evaluating User Experience in Games.

[16]  F. Mueller,et al.  Bubble Popper: considering body contact in games , 2012, FnG '12.

[17]  Narcís Parés,et al.  Interactive slide: an interactive playground to promote physical activity and socialization of children , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  Huib de Ridder,et al.  A Research Framework for Playful Persuasion Based on Psychological Needs and Bodily Interaction , 2011, HBU.

[19]  Hayes Raffle,et al.  Social immersive media: pursuing best practices for multi-user interactive camera/projector exhibits , 2009, CHI.

[20]  Christopher L. Moore,et al.  Hats of Affect: A Study of Affect, Achievements and Hats in Team Fortress 2 , 2011, Game Stud..

[21]  Laura Malinverni,et al.  Experience as an Object to Think with: from Sensing-in-action to Making-Sense of action in Full-Body Interaction Learning Environments , 2016, TEI.

[22]  Robby van Delden,et al.  Steering Gameplay Behavior in the Interactive Tag Playground , 2014, AmI.

[23]  Susanne Seitinger,et al.  A new playground experience: going digital? , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[24]  Katherine Isbister,et al.  Guidelines for the Design of Movement-Based Games and Their Relevance to HCI , 2015, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  LandryPascal,et al.  Controlling and modulating physical activity through Interaction Tempo in exergames , 2014 .

[26]  Robby van Delden,et al.  Augmenting playspaces to enhance the game experience: A tag game case study , 2016, Entertain. Comput..

[27]  Dennis R. Wixon,et al.  Using the RITE method to improve products; a definition and a case study , 2007 .

[28]  Steve Strand,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edition , 2006 .

[29]  Chris Arney.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[30]  Georgios N. Yannakakis,et al.  Entertainment modeling through physiology in physical play , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Framework for Designing and Evaluating Game Achievements , 2011, DiGRA Conference.

[32]  Ronald Poppe,et al.  Automatic behavior analysis in tag games: from traditional spaces to interactive playgrounds , 2016, Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces.

[33]  Robby van Delden,et al.  Distributed Embodied Team Play, a Distributed Interactive Pong Playground , 2016, INTETAIN.

[34]  J. H. Eggen,et al.  Designing for social interaction in open-ended play environments , 2015 .

[35]  Anton Nijholt.  Playful user interfaces , 2014 .

[36]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  Stomp: an interactive platform for people with intellectual disabilities , 2011, Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology.

[37]  Narcís Parés,et al.  Controlling and modulating physical activity through Interaction Tempo in exergames: A quantitative empirical analysis , 2014, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[38]  Stuart MacFarlane,et al.  Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions in child computer interaction , 2006, IDC '06.

[39]  Berry Eggen,et al.  Key issues for the successful design of an intelligent, interactive playground , 2008, IDC.