Effects of local hemodynamics and plaque characteristics on neointimal response following bioresorbable scaffolds implantation in coronary bifurcations

Heterogeneous neointimal response has been observed after implantation of all generations of coronary stents. Our aim was assessing local factors of shear stress (SS) and plaque characteristics in neointimal response after implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) in bifurcations. Ten patients from the BIFSORB pilot study were analysed. Follow-up optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) was performed at 1 month and 2 years. Coronary lumen and BRS structure were reconstructed by fusion of OFDI and angiography and were used for subsequent flow simulation. Plaque arc degree and SS were quantified using post-procedural OFDI data and were matched with follow-up OFDI using anatomical landmarks. Strut-level and segment-level analysis were performed for 1-month and 2-year follow-up respectively. A total of 444 struts (54 jailing struts) were included at 1-month follow-up. Time-average SS (TASS) was significantly lower for covered struts than for uncovered struts in non-bifurcation segments (TASS: 1.81 ± 1.87 vs. 3.88 ± 3.72 Pa, p < 0.001). The trend remained the same for jailing struts, although statistically insignificant (TASS: 10.85 ± 13.12 vs. 13.64 ± 14.48 Pa, p = 0.328). For 2-year follow-up, a total of 66 sub-regions were analysed. Neointimal hyperplasia area (NTA) was negatively correlated with TASS in core-segments (ρ = − 0.389, p = 0.037) and positively correlated with plaque arc degree in non-core segments (ρ = 0.387, p = 0.018). Slightly stronger correlations with NTA were observed when combining TASS and plaque arc degree in both core segments (ρ = − 0.412, p = 0.026) and non-core segments (ρ = − 0.395, p = 0.015). Hemodynamic microenvironment and baseline plaque characteristics may regulate neointimal response after BRS implantation in bifurcation. These findings underline the combined role of plaque characteristics and local hemodynamics in vessel healing after stent implantation.

[1]  Jouke Dijkstra,et al.  Local Flow Patterns After Implantation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Coronary Bifurcations　- Novel Findings by Computational Fluid Dynamics. , 2018, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[2]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Effect of the endothelial shear stress patterns on neointimal proliferation following drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: an optical coherence tomography study. , 2014, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

[3]  B. Brott,et al.  The role of vascular calcification in inducing fatigue and fracture of coronary stents. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[4]  N. Bruining,et al.  The impact of Fourier-Domain optical coherence tomography catheter induced motion artefacts on quantitative measurements of a PLLA-based bioresorbable scaffold , 2014, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[5]  Habib Samady,et al.  Combination of plaque burden, wall shear stress, and plaque phenotype has incremental value for prediction of coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability. , 2014, Atherosclerosis.

[6]  J. Reiber,et al.  Impact of Side Branch Modeling on Computation of Endothelial Shear Stress in Coronary Artery Disease: Coronary Tree Reconstruction by Fusion of 3D Angiography and OCT. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Andrew Ooi,et al.  Endothelial shear stress 5 years after implantation of a coronary bioresorbable scaffold , 2018, European heart journal.

[8]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Effects of Low Endothelial Shear Stress After Stent Implantation on Subsequent Neointimal Hyperplasia and Clinical Outcomes in Humans , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[9]  William Wijns,et al.  Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  Renu Virmani,et al.  Morphological Predictors of Restenosis After Coronary Stenting in Humans , 2002, Circulation.

[11]  F. Migliavacca,et al.  Influence of plaque calcifications on coronary stent fracture: a numerical fatigue life analysis including cardiac wall movement. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  C. Macaya,et al.  Assessment of potential relationship between wall shear stress and arterial wall response after bare metal stent and sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[13]  Kevin Croce,et al.  Vascular inflammation and repair: implications for re-endothelialization, restenosis, and stent thrombosis. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  Bernard Chevalier,et al.  Circumferential evaluation of the neointima by optical coherence tomography after ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: can the scaffold cap the plaque? , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[15]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Comparative analysis method of permanent metallic stents (XIENCE) and bioresorbable poly-L-lactic (PLLA) scaffolds (Absorb) on optical coherence tomography at baseline and follow-up. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  Dimitrios I Fotiadis,et al.  The effect of shear stress on neointimal response following sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation compared with bare-metal stents in humans. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Influence of plaque calcium on neointimal hyperplasia following bare metal and drug‐eluting stent implantation , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[18]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Fusion of optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data for more accurate evaluation of the endothelial shear stress patterns and neointimal distribution after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: comparison with intravascular ultrasound-derived reconstructions , 2014, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[19]  Emil N. Holck,et al.  Procedural findings and early healing response after implantation of a self-apposing bioresorbable scaffold in coronary bifurcation lesions , 2019, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[20]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Yiannis S. Chatzizisis,et al.  Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  P. Serruys,et al.  Usefulness of shear stress pattern in predicting neointima distribution in sirolimus-eluting stents in coronary arteries. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  Ryo Torii,et al.  Incomplete Stent Apposition Causes High Shear Flow Disturbances and Delay in Neointimal Coverage as a Function of Strut to Wall Detachment Distance: Implications for the Management of Incomplete Stent Apposition , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[24]  J J Wentzel,et al.  Relationship Between Neointimal Thickness and Shear Stress After Wallstent Implantation in Human Coronary Arteries , 2001, Circulation.