Seven questions around interdisciplinarity in energy research

Abstract “Interdisciplinarity” is one of the most “fashionable” words to be found in contemporary energy research. The hype and the fuzziness that can characterise its use conceals a bright promise for research: the possibility of opening up new research perspectives, of finding new answers, but also of raising new questions. In this article, we explore interdisciplinarity in energy research through seven questions (corresponding to seven sections): “what does it mean?”, “why?”, “who’s involved?”, “how?”, “what?”, “what barriers?”, and “what prospects?” In the “what does it mean?” section, we will try to illustrate the “degrees of interdisciplinarity” in energy research by means of definitions emanating from recent work. The “why” question focuses on the main benefits of interdisciplinarity, while “who’s involved?” raises the issue of “by whom and with whom”. The “how” section essentially looks at methods and frameworks. The “what” question introduces the main topics of interdisciplinary energy research, presenting the papers that make up this special issue. “What barriers?” and “what prospects?” conclude the paper with an attempt to identify the new research paths that are beginning to emerge.

[1]  B. Sovacool What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[2]  T. Konstantinou,et al.  Designing for residents: Building monitoring and co-creation in social housing renovation in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[3]  B. Mallaband,et al.  Crossing transdisciplinary boundaries within energy research: An ‘on the ground’ perspective from early career researchers , 2017 .

[4]  Grégoire Wallenborn The tragedy of energy efficiency. An interdisciplinary analysis of rebound effects , 2015 .

[5]  E. Shove,et al.  Consumers, Producers and Practices , 2005 .

[6]  Rune Hylsberg Jacobsen,et al.  Green lift: Exploring the demand response potential of elevators in Danish buildings , 2017 .

[7]  P. Stern How can social science research become more influential in energy transitions , 2017 .

[8]  G. Kiss,et al.  Solar energy in the built environment: powering the sustainable city , 2012 .

[9]  Darren Robinson,et al.  A generalised stochastic model for the simulation of occupant presence , 2008 .

[10]  Dominique Badariotti,et al.  Evaluating the complex governance arrangements surrounding energy retrofitting programs: The case of collective ownership buildings in France , 2017 .

[11]  Manfred A. Max-Neef Foundations of transdisciplinarity , 2005 .

[12]  Victoria Haines,et al.  Blurred lines: how does cross-disciplinary research work in practice , 2014, UbiComp Adjunct.

[13]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Tackling the interplay of occupants’ heating practices and building physics: Insights from a German mixed methods study , 2017 .

[14]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: The big picture , 2017 .

[15]  Manuel Gameiro da Silva,et al.  An integrated approach on energy consumption and indoor environmental quality performance in six Portuguese secondary schools , 2017 .

[16]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[17]  Philip James,et al.  Metrics of urban morphology and their impact on energy consumption: A case study in the United Kingdom , 2017 .

[18]  Jenny Love,et al.  From social and technical to socio-technical: Designing integrated research on domestic energy use , 2015 .

[19]  V. Sawtelle,et al.  Ontological metaphors for negative energy in an interdisciplinary context , 2013, 1312.6112.

[20]  Acg Cooper,et al.  UK Energy Lab: A feasibility study for a longitudinal, nationally representative sociotechnical survey of energy use , 2014 .

[21]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Perceived Causes and Solutions of the Translation Problem in Management Research , 2007 .

[22]  Nickolas J. Themelis The role of waste-to-energy in urban infrastructure , 2012 .

[23]  J. Palm,et al.  Categorizing Barriers to Energy Efficiency – an Interdisciplinary Perspective , 2010 .

[24]  Gene I. Rochlin,et al.  Energy research and the contributions of the social sciences: A retrospective examination , 2014 .

[25]  E. Gabe-Thomas,et al.  The reality of cross-disciplinary energy research in the United Kingdom:a social science perspective , 2017 .

[26]  Shady Attia,et al.  Towards regenerative and positive impact architecture: A comparison of two net zero energy buildings , 2016 .

[27]  Theodore R. Schatzki,et al.  Practices and Actions A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens , 1997 .

[28]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand , 2014 .

[29]  O. T. Masoso,et al.  The dark side of occupants’ behaviour on building energy use , 2010 .

[30]  Darren Robinson,et al.  On the behaviour and adaptation of office occupants , 2008 .

[31]  A. Cooper,et al.  Building physics into the social: Enhancing the policy impact of energy studies and energy social science research , 2017 .

[32]  Kimberly S. Wolske,et al.  Explaining interest in adopting residential solar photovoltaic systems in the United States: Toward an integration of behavioral theories , 2017 .

[33]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Moving Outside or Inside? Objectification and Reflexivity in the Governance of Socio-Technical Systems , 2007 .

[34]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Economic Sociology and the Social Problem of Energy Inefficiency , 2007 .

[35]  Ivan Korolija,et al.  Creating sustainable cities one building at a time: Towards an integrated urban design framework , 2017 .

[36]  Nicole D. Sintov,et al.  Should we quit our jobs? Challenges, barriers and recommendations for interdisciplinary energy research , 2017 .

[37]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Georgina Born,et al.  Logics of interdisciplinarity , 2008 .

[39]  P. Stern,et al.  Integrating social science in energy research , 2015 .

[40]  R. Galvin Humans and stuff: Interweaving social and physical science in energy policy research , 2017 .

[41]  Sarah E. Ryan,et al.  Energy research and the contributions of the social sciences: A contemporary examination , 2014 .

[42]  Xing Shi,et al.  A review on building energy efficient design optimization rom the perspective of architects , 2016 .

[43]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[44]  A. R. Hansen The social structure of heat consumption in Denmark: New interpretations from quantitative analysis , 2016 .

[45]  E. Shove Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[46]  Sophie Claude,et al.  The Living Lab methodology for complex environments: Insights from the thermal refurbishment of a historical district in the city of Cahors, France , 2017 .

[47]  Catherine Mei Ling Wong,et al.  Assembling Interdisciplinary Energy Research through an Actor Network Theory (ANT) frame , 2016 .

[48]  Ala Hasan,et al.  Impact of adaptive thermal comfort criteria on building energy use and cooling equipment size using , 2011 .

[49]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[50]  Darren Robinson,et al.  A bottom-up stochastic model to predict building occupants' time-dependent activities , 2013 .

[51]  Negative Energy: Why Interdisciplinary Physics Requires Multiple Ontologies , 2013, 1307.5106.

[52]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change , 2011 .

[53]  Irmeli Mikkonen,et al.  Evaluation of European energy behavioural change programmes , 2012 .

[54]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  Energy cultures: A framework for understanding energy behaviours , 2010 .

[55]  Julia K. Day,et al.  Investigating willingness to save energy and communication about energy use in the American workplace with the attitude-behavior-context model , 2017 .

[56]  V. Masson,et al.  Parametrisation of the variety of human behaviour related to building energy consumption in TEB (SURFEX v. 8.2) , 2017 .

[57]  Hasanuddin Lamit,et al.  User satisfaction adaptive behaviors for assessing energy efficient building indoor cooling and lighting environment , 2014 .

[58]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[59]  Mark Gaterell,et al.  Serious games for energy social science research , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[60]  M. A. Hyams Wind energy in the built environment , 2012 .

[61]  H. Weigt,et al.  Interdisciplinary energy research and energy consumption: What, why, and how? , 2015 .

[62]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Interdisciplinary research in climate and energy sciences , 2016 .

[63]  A. Cooper Building a socio-technical energy research community: Theory, practice and impact , 2017 .

[64]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  A cultural model of household energy consumption , 1992 .

[65]  R. Galvin,et al.  The rebound effect and Schatzki’s social theory: Reassessing the socio-materiality of energy consumption via a German case study , 2016 .

[66]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  Peer review and the relevance gap: Ten suggestions for policy-makers , 2007 .

[67]  R. Scholz,et al.  Transdisciplinarity : joint problem solving among science, technology, and society : an effective way for managing complexity , 2001 .

[68]  Alexis Bourgeois,et al.  Modeling and mapping domestic energy behavior: Insights from a consumer survey in France , 2017 .

[69]  G. Hitchcock,et al.  An integrated framework for energy use and behaviour in the domestic sector , 1993 .

[70]  J. Virgone,et al.  Design of buildings shape and energetic consumption , 2001 .

[71]  James Keirstead,et al.  Evaluating the applicability of integrated domestic energy consumption frameworks in the UK , 2006 .

[72]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[73]  Richard Van Noorden Interdisciplinary research by the numbers , 2015, Nature.

[74]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[75]  Marjorie Musy,et al.  Urban planning as a solution to save energy in buildings , 2010 .

[76]  Miguel Molina-Solana,et al.  Data science for building energy management: A review , 2017 .

[77]  G. Z. Brown,et al.  Sun, Wind and Light: Architectural Design Strategies , 1985 .

[78]  D. Spreng Tackling Long-Term Global Energy Problems: The Contribution of Social Science , 2012 .

[79]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[80]  Daniel Spreng,et al.  Transdisciplinary energy research – Reflecting the context , 2014 .

[81]  Ida Nilstad Pettersen,et al.  Ambitions at work: Professional practices and the energy performance of non-residential buildings in Norway , 2017 .

[82]  J. Klein,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. , 1991 .

[83]  G. Waitt,et al.  What kind of socio-technical research for what sort of influence on energy policy? , 2017 .

[84]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Nous n'avons jamais été modernes , 2006 .

[85]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Of comfort and cost: Examining indoor comfort conditions and guests’ valuations in Italian hotel rooms , 2017 .

[86]  S. A. Hammer,et al.  Smart energy for cities: decentralized supply resources and their link to the modern grid , 2012 .

[87]  J. Stephenson What does energy mean? An interdisciplinary conversation , 2017 .

[88]  Chien-fei Chen,et al.  A systematic review of strategies for overcoming the barriers to energy-efficient technologies in buildings , 2017 .

[89]  Jin Wen,et al.  Quantifying the human–building interaction: Considering the active, adaptive occupant in building performance simulation , 2016 .

[90]  D. Spreng On physics and the social in energy policy , 2017 .

[91]  M. Winskel Embedding Social Sciences in Interdisciplinary Research: Recent Experiences from Interdisciplinary Energy Research , 2014 .

[92]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Convenience and energy consumption in the smart home of the future: Industry visions from Australia and beyond , 2017 .