Positron emission mammography imaging

This paper examines current trends in Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) instrumentation and the performance tradeoffs inherent in them. The most common geometry is a pair of parallel planes of detector modules. They subtend a larger solid angle around the breast than conventional PET cameras, and so have both higher efficiency and lower cost. Extensions to this geometry include encircling the breast, measuring the depth of interaction (DOI), and dual-modality imaging (PEM and x-ray mammography, as well as PEM and x-ray guided biopsy). The ultimate utility of PEM may not be decided by instrument performance, but by biological and medical factors, such as the patient to patient variation in radiotracer uptake or the as yet undetermined role of PEM in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.

[1]  W. Worstell,et al.  First results with high-resolution PET detector modules using wavelength-shifting fibers , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[2]  C. Thompson,et al.  Imaging performance of PEM-1: a high resolution system for positron emission mammography , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[3]  J. Mulshine,et al.  Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  R Freifelder,et al.  Dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  W. Moses,et al.  Characterization of a 64 channel PET detector using photodiodes for crystal identification , 1997 .

[6]  Ronald H. Huesman,et al.  PET camera designs for imaging breast cancer and axillary node involvement , 1995 .

[7]  C J Thompson,et al.  Positron emission mammographic instrument: initial results. , 2000, Radiology.

[8]  M. B. Williams,et al.  PET detector using waveshifting optical fibers and microchannel plate PMT with delay line readout , 1998 .

[9]  S R Cherry,et al.  Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging. , 2000, Medical physics.

[10]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  S. Majewski,et al.  The potential role of positron emission mammography for detection of breast cancer. A phantom study. , 2000, Medical physics.