Calibration strategy and generality test of three-axis magnetometers

Abstract Calibration strategy will influence the calibration performance of three-axis magnetometers. In this paper, three different calibration strategies (symmetrical calibration, orthogonal calibration and random calibration) are introduced and verified by simulation and experiments. The experimental system mainly consists of three-axis fluxgate magnetometer (MAG3300), 2D nonmagnetic rotation equipment and proton magnetometer. The scalar value of magnetic field was obtained with proton magnetometer and considered to be the true value. Calibration performance of three different calibration strategies were analyzed and compared. Experimental results show that after calibration the scalar RMS error has dropped 88.5%, 85.5% and 87.6% respectively. To check the generality of the estimated error parameters, another site was chosen to be a validation position, and the calibration performance of three calibration strategies were tested and compared. After calibration, the scalar RMS error has dropped 83.2%, 78.9% and 78.8% respectively. Thus the symmetrical calibration is considered to be the best calibration strategy among three calibration strategies.

[1]  Yuanxin Wu,et al.  Improved multi-position calibration for inertial measurement units , 2009 .

[2]  Hans-Ulrich Auster,et al.  Calibration of flux-gate magnetometers using relative motion , 2002 .

[3]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  Magnetometer-Based Attitude and Rate Estimation for Spacecraft with Wire Booms , 2004 .

[4]  Carlos Silvestre,et al.  Geometric Approach to Strapdown Magnetometer Calibration in Sensor Frame , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  Jan Včelák,et al.  Calibration of triaxial fluxgate gradiometer , 2006 .

[6]  Pablo Juan Garcia,et al.  Measurement of mortar permittivity during setting using a coplanar waveguide , 2010 .

[7]  Pavel Ripka,et al.  Automated system for the calibration of magnetometers , 2009 .

[8]  Feilu Luo,et al.  Calibration of three-axis fluxgate magnetometers with nonlinear least square method , 2013 .

[9]  Pavel Ripka,et al.  Errors of AMR compass and methods of their compensation , 2006 .

[10]  Demoz Gebre-Egziabher,et al.  Magnetometer Autocalibration Leveraging Measurement Locus Constraints , 2007 .

[11]  M. Shuster,et al.  Complete linear attitude-independent magnetometer calibration , 2002 .

[12]  Feilu Luo,et al.  Calibration of a fluxgate magnetometer array and its application in magnetic object localization , 2013 .

[13]  Timo Pylvänäinen,et al.  Automatic and adaptive calibration of 3D field sensors , 2008 .

[14]  Demoz Gebre-Egziabher,et al.  Calibration of Strapdown Magnetometers in Magnetic Field Domain , 2006 .

[15]  Fritz Primdahl,et al.  Scalar calibration of vector magnetometers , 2000 .

[16]  G.H. Elkaim,et al.  Extension of a two-step calibration methodology to include nonorthogonal sensor axes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[17]  Sangkyung Sung,et al.  Error Calibration of Magnetometer Using Nonlinear Integrated Filter Model With Inertial Sensors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[18]  Fritz Primdahl,et al.  Ørsted Pre-Flight Magnetometer Calibration Mission , 2003 .

[19]  Pavel Ripka,et al.  AMR navigation systems and methods of their calibration , 2005 .

[20]  Feilu Luo,et al.  Nonlinear temperature compensation of fluxgate magnetometers with a least-squares support vector machine , 2012 .

[21]  John L. Crassidis,et al.  Real-Time Attitude-Independent Three-Axis Magnetometer Calibration , 2005 .