Evaluation of Wearable Device for the Elderly (W-Emas)

The use of wearable technology is one of the current approach to help and support the elderly in sustaining their daily lifestyle. The elderly face various constraints in handling and using new technology like the wearable technology. In this study, we provide an alternative approach to user interface based on the Tangible User Interface (TUI), instead of the Graphical User Interface (GUI). We built a wearable prototype in the form of a watch device which allows the elderly to control electrical and electronic appliances such the lights, lamp, fan and computer in their room; as well as their telephone for emergency calls. The wearable device was developed using the prototyping approach and evaluation was conducted through a usability testing based on four constructs: ease of use, effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction. Analysis was carried out based on the triangulation approach. The ease of use construct was measured using the standard System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. The effectiveness construct was measured based on the time taken for task completion. The efficiency construct was measured based on the error rate and task completion rate. Both these tasks were conducted using the observational approach. For user satisfaction construct the interview approach was conducted.

[1]  N. Charness,et al.  Aging and Information Technology Use , 2009 .

[2]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  RoboCare: an Integrated Robotic System for the Domestic Care of the Elderly , 2003 .

[3]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  A conversational robot in an elderly care center: An ethnographic study , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[4]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Pearl: A Mobile Robotic Assistant for the Elderly , 2002 .

[5]  F. Miskelly,et al.  Assistive technology in elderly care. , 2001, Age and ageing.

[6]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[7]  N. Charness,et al.  Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) , 2006 .

[8]  Giuseppe Andreoni,et al.  Design and Ergonomics of Monitoring System for Elderly , 2014, HCI.

[9]  Sara J. Czaja,et al.  The impact of aging on access to technology , 2005, ASAC.

[10]  Rolf Dieter Schraft,et al.  Care-O-bot II—Development of a Next Generation Robotic Home Assistant , 2004, Auton. Robots.

[11]  Quynh Lê,et al.  Smart Homes for Older People: Positive Aging in a Digital World , 2012, Future Internet.

[12]  Rachelle S. Heller,et al.  EC/NSF workshop on universal accessibility of ubiquitous computing: providing for the elderly event report , 2001, WUAUC'01.

[13]  Maribeth Gandy Coleman,et al.  The Gesture Pendant: A Self-illuminating, Wearable, Infrared Computer Vision System for Home Automation Control and Medical Monitoring , 2000, Digest of Papers. Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[14]  Amanda J. C. Sharkey,et al.  Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people , 2014, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  Jeff Sauro,et al.  The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale , 2009, HCI.

[16]  Marjorie Skubic,et al.  Fall Detection in Homes of Older Adults Using the Microsoft Kinect , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[17]  Jeff Sauro,et al.  Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research , 2012 .

[18]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[19]  Jaerock Kwon,et al.  Affordable Remote Health Monitoring System for the Elderly Using Smart Mobile Device , 2015 .

[20]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[21]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..