Motivational processes influence a child's acquisition, transfer, and use of knowledge and skills, yet educationally relevant conceptions of motivation have been elusive. Using recent research within the social-cognitive framework, Dweck describes adaptive and maladaptive motivational patterns and presents a research-based model of motivational processes. This model shows how the particular goals children pursue on cognitive tasks shape their reactions to success and failure and influence the quality of their cognitive performance. Dweck argues that this approach has important implications for practice and the design of interventions to change maladaptive motivational processes. She presents a compelling proposal for explaining motivational influences on gender differences in mathematics achievement and observes that empirically based interventions may prevent current achievement discrepancies.--The Editors Most research on effective learning and performance of cognitive tasks analyzes the particular cognitive skills required to succeed at those tasks. In contrast, the focus here is on motivational processes that affect success on cognitive tasks. That is, the focus is on psychological factors, other than ability, that determine how effectively the individual acquires and uses skills. It has long been known that factors other than ability influence whether children seek or avoid challenges, whether they persist or withdraw in the face of difficulty, and whether they use and develop their skills effectively. However, the components and bases of adaptive motivational patterns have been poorly understood. As a resuit, commonsense analyses have been limited and have not provided a basis for effective practices. Indeed, many "commonsense" beliefs have been called into question or seriously qualified by recent research--for example, the belief that large amounts of praise and success will establish, maintain, or reinstate adaptive patterns, or that "brighter" children have more adaptive patterns and thus are more likely to choose personally challenging tasks or to persist in the face of difficulty. In the past 10 to 15 years a dramatic change has taken place in the study of motivation. This change has resulted in a coherent, replicable, and educationally relevant body of findings--and in a clearer understanding of motivational phenomena. During this time, the emphasis has shifted to a social-cognitive approachwaway from external contingencies, on the one hand, and global, internal states on the other. It has shifted to an emphasis on cognitive mediators, that is, to how children construe the situation, interpret events in the situation, and process information about the situation. Although external contingencies and internal affective states are by no means ignored, they are seen as part of a process whose workings are best penetrated by focusing on organizing cognitive variables. Specifically, the social-cognitive approach has allowed us to (a) characterize adaptive and maladaptive patterns, (b) explain them in terms of specific underlying processes, and thus (c) begin to provide a rigorous conceptual and empirical basis for intervention and practice. Adaptive and Maladaptive Motivational Patterns The study of motivation deals with the causes of goaloriented activity (Atkinson, 1964; Beck, 1983; Dollard & Miller, 1950; Hull, 1943; Veroff, 1969). Achievement motivation involves a particular class of goals--those involving competence--and these goals appear to fall into two classes: (a) learning goals, in which individuals seek to increase their competence, to understand or master something new, and (b) performance goals, in which individuals seek to gain favorable judgments of their competence or avoid negative judgments of their competence (Dweck & Elliott, 1983; NichoUs, 1984; Nicholls & Dweck, 1979). l Adaptive motivational patterns are those that promote the establishment, maintenance, and attainment of personally challenging and personally valued achievement goals. Maladaptive patterns, then, are associated with a failure to establish reasonable, valued goals, to maintain effective striving toward those goals, or, ultimately, to attain valued goals that are potentially within one's reach. Research has clearly documented adaptive and maladaptive patterns of achievement behavior. The adaptive ("mastery-oriented") pattern is characterized by challenge seeking and high, effective persistence in the face of obstacles. Children displaying this pattern appear to enjoy exerting effort in the pursuit of task mastery. In contrast, the maladaptive ("helpless") pattern is characterized by challenge avoidance and low persistence in the face of difficulty. Children displaying this pattern tend to evidence negative affect (such as anxiety) and negative self-cogniCorrespondence concerning this article should be addressed to Carol S. Dweck, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, 603 E. Daniel, Champaign, IL 61820. l The word performance will be used in several ways, not only in connection with performance goals. It will also be used to refer to the child's task activity (performance of a task) and to the product of that activity (level of performance). The meaning should be clear from the context. 1040 October 1986 9 American Psychologist Copyrisht 1986 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0003-066X/86/$00.75 Vol. 41, No. 10, 1040-1048 Table 1 Achievement Goals and Achievement Behavior Confidence in Theory of intelligence Goal orientation present ability Behavior pattern Entity theory (Intelligence is fixed) Incremental theory (Intelligence is malleable) > Performance goal (Goal is to gain positive judgments/avoid negative judgments of competence) > Learning goal (Goal is to increase competence) If high ---> Mastery-oriented Seek challenge but High persistence If low ~ Helpless Avoid challenge Low persistence If high > Mastery-oriented ioOr ~ ' Seek challenge (that fosters learning) High persistence tions when they confront obstacles (e.g., Ames, 1984; C. Diener & Dweck, 1978, 1980; Dweck & Reppucci, 1973; Nicholls, 1975). Although children displaying the different patterns do not differ in intellectual ability, these patterns can have profound effects on cognitive performance. In experiments conducted in both laboratory and classroom settings, it has been shown that children with the maladaptive pattern are seriously hampered in the acquisition and display of cognitive skills when they meet obstacles. Children with the adaptive pattern, by contrast, seem undaunted or even seem to have their performance facilitated by the increased challenge. If not ability, then what are the bases of these patterns? Most recently, research has suggested that children's goals in achievement situations differentially foster the two patterns. That is, achievement situations afford a choice of goals, and the one the child preferentially adopts predicts the achievement pattern that child will display. Table 1 summarizes the conceptualization that is emerging from the research. BasieaUy, children's theories of intelligence appear to orient them toward different goals: Children who believe intelligence is a fixed trait tend to orient toward gaining favorable judgments of that trait (performance goals), whereas children who believe intelligence is a malleable quality tend to orient toward developing that quality (learning goals). The goals then appear to set up the different behavior patterns. 2 Learning and Performance Goals Contrasted How and why do the different goals foster the different patterns? How do they shape task choice and task pursuit to facilitate or impede cognitive performance? The research reviewed below indicates that with performance goals, the entire task choice and pursuit process is built around children's concerns about their ability level. In contrast, with learning goals the choice and pursuit processes involve a focus on progress and mastery through 2 See M. Bandura and Dweck (1985), Dweck and Elliott (1983), and Leggett (1985) for a more extensive treatment of children's theories of intelligence. The present article will focus on achievement goals and their allied behavior patterns. effort. Further, this research shows how a focus on ability judgments can result in a tendency to avoid and withdraw from challenge, whereas a focus on progress through effort creates a tendency to seek and be energized by challenge. Although relatively few studies as yet have explicitly induced and compared (or measured and compared) learning versus performance goals (see M. Bandura & Dweck, 1985; Elliott & Dweck, 1985; FarreU & Dweck, 1985; Leggett, 1985, 1986), many have manipulated the salience and value of performance goals, and hence the relative value of the two types of goals. This has been done, for example, by instituting a competitive versus individual reward structure (e.g., Ames, 1984; Ames, Ames, & Felker, 1977), by varying the alleged diagnosticity of the task vis vis important abilities (e.g., Nicholls, 1975), by introducing an audience or evaluator versus allowing the individual to perform privately or focusing his or her attention on the task (e.g., Brockner & Hulton, 1978; Carver & Scheier, 1981; E. Diener & SruU, 1979), and by presenting the task with "test" instructions versus "game" or neutral instructions (e.g., Entin & Raynor, 1973; Lekarczyk & Hill, 1969; McCoy, 1965; Sarason, 1972). Taken together, the results suggest that highlighting performance goals relative to learning goals can have the following effects on achievement behavior. Goals and Task Choice Appropriately challenging tasks are often the ones that are best for utilizing and increasing one's abilities. Recent research has shown that performance goals work against the pursuit of challenge by requiring that children's perceptions of their ability be high (and remain high) before the children will desire a challenging task (M. Bandura & D
[1]
E. Entin,et al.
Effects of Contingent Future Orientation and Achievement Motivation on Performance in Two Kinds of Tasks.
,
1973
.
[2]
William M. Stallings,et al.
Freedom from External Evaluation.
,
1972
.
[3]
John O. Kangas,et al.
Intelligence at middle age: A thirty-eight year follow-up.
,
1971
.
[4]
T. Hilton,et al.
Sex differences in mathematics achievement: A longitudinal study.
,
1974
.
[5]
J. Stanley,et al.
Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact?
,
1980,
Science.
[6]
A. T. Wray.
PERSONALITY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY
,
1936
.
[7]
B. Skinner,et al.
Principles of Behavior
,
1944
.
[8]
Michael Marland,et al.
Sex Differentiation and Schooling.
,
1985
.
[9]
C. Dweck,et al.
Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children
,
1973
.
[10]
Dale H. Schunk,et al.
Effects of Effort Attributional Feedback on Children's Perceived Self-Efficacy and Achievement
,
1982
.
[11]
Martin V. Covington,et al.
Effort: The Double-Edged Sword in School Achievement.
,
1979
.
[12]
Elizabeth Fennema,et al.
The Study of Mathematics By High School Girls and Boys: Related Variables
,
1977
.
[13]
R. Ryan,et al.
Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory.
,
1983
.
[14]
C. Dweck,et al.
Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement.
,
1988,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[15]
R. Beck,et al.
Motivation: Theories and Principles
,
1978
.
[16]
N. Miller,et al.
Personality and Psychotherapy
,
1951
.
[17]
H. Terrace.
Extinction of a discriminative operant following discrimination learning with and without errors.
,
1969,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[18]
Development of Children's Performance-Related Judgments.
,
1980
.
[19]
J. Brockner,et al.
How to reverse the vicious cycle of low self-esteem: The importance of attentional focus
,
1978
.
[20]
C S Dweck,et al.
Learned helplessness in social situations.
,
1980,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[21]
S. Asher,et al.
Goals, Games, and Social Competence: Effects of Sex, Grade Level, and Sociometric Status.
,
1985
.
[22]
D. L. Jennings,et al.
When experiences of failure promote expectations of success: The impact of attribution failure to ineffective strategies1
,
1980
.
[23]
Carol S. Dweck,et al.
Determinants of academic achievement: The interaction of children's achievement orientations with skill area.
,
1984
.
[24]
E. M. Hetherington,et al.
Socialization, personality, and social development
,
1983
.
[25]
J. Meece,et al.
Sex differences in attributions and learned helplessness
,
1982
.
[26]
B. Weiner,et al.
The perceived informational value and affective consequences of choice behavior and intermediate difficulty task selection
,
1976
.
[27]
T. K. Srull,et al.
Self-awareness, psychological perspective, and self-reinforcement in relation to personal and social standards.
,
1979
.
[28]
Nina L. Colwill,et al.
The psychology of sex differences
,
1978
.
[29]
Edward L. Deci,et al.
The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes1
,
1980
.
[30]
L. Aiken,et al.
Intellectual Talent: Research and Development
,
1976
.
[31]
R. Rosenthal,et al.
Pygmalion in the classroom
,
1968
.
[32]
R. Debus,et al.
Persistence and the Causal Perception of Failure: Modifying Cognitive Attributions.
,
1978
.
[33]
Carole A. Ames,et al.
Effects of competitive reward structure and valence of outcome on children's achievement attributions.
,
1977
.
[34]
C. Carver,et al.
Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior
,
1981
.
[35]
R. Moulton.
EFFECTS OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE ON LEVEL OF ASPIRATION AS RELATED TO ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVES.
,
1965,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[36]
W. Meyer,et al.
The informational value of evaluative behavior: Influences of praise and blame on perceptions of ability.
,
1979
.
[37]
E. E. Jones,et al.
Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success.
,
1978,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[38]
Carole A. Ames,et al.
Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures.
,
1984
.
[39]
John W. Atkinson,et al.
Introduction: Motivation
,
1964
.
[40]
W. Rhodes.
Generalization of Attribution Retraining
,
1977
.
[41]
K. Hill,et al.
Self-esteem, test anxiety, stress, and verbal learning.
,
1969
.
[42]
Charles P. Smith,et al.
Achievement-Related Motives in Children
,
1969
.
[43]
John G. Nicholls,et al.
Effort is virtuous, but it's better to have ability: Evaluative responses to perceptions of effort and ability
,
1976
.
[44]
George T. O'hearn,et al.
Research and development toward the improvement of education
,
1968
.
[45]
R. Decharms,et al.
Measuring Motivation in Culturally Disadvantaged School Children
,
1968
.
[46]
B. Weiner.
Theories of motivation : from mechanism to cognition
,
1972
.
[47]
C. Surber.
Inferences of ability and effort: Evidence for two different processes.
,
1984
.
[48]
A. Bandura,et al.
Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.
,
1981
.
[49]
N. McCoy.
Effects of test anxiety on children's performance as a function of instructions and type of task.
,
1965,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[50]
E. Fennema,et al.
Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors
,
1977
.
[51]
C. Dweck.
The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness.
,
1975
.
[52]
G. S. Lesser.
Psychology and Educational Practice
,
1971
.
[53]
John G. Nicholls,et al.
Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex.
,
1975
.
[54]
C. Dweck,et al.
An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success.
,
1980,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[55]
B. Weiner.
Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory
,
1974
.
[56]
C. Dweck,et al.
An Analysis of Learned Helplessness: Continuous Changes in Performance, Strategy, and Achievement Cognitions Following Failure.
,
1978
.
[57]
J. Nicholls.
Development of perception of own attainment and causal attributions for success and failure in reading.
,
1979,
Journal of educational psychology.
[58]
C P Smith,et al.
Achievement-related motives and risk-taking in games of skill and chance.
,
1966,
Journal of personality.
[59]
J. Stanley,et al.
Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description, and Development (MT:D3)
,
1975
.
[60]
M. Lepper,et al.
The Hidden costs of reward : new perspectives on the psychology of human motivation
,
1978
.
[61]
M. L. Snyder,et al.
Poor performance following unsolvable problems: Learned helplessness or egotism?
,
1978
.
[62]
P. Peterson,et al.
Increasing reading persistence and altering attributional style of learned helpless children.
,
1981,
Journal of educational psychology.
[63]
W. Meyer.
Indirect communications About Perceived Ability Estimates.
,
1982
.