Influence of tube length tolerance on seismic responses of multi-storey buildings with dual-tube self-centering buckling-restrained braces

Abstract The dual-tube self-centering buckling restrained brace (SC-BRB) is a novel bracing system with both self-centering and energy dissipation capabilities. However, the actual initial stiffness of SC-BRBs can be remarkably lower than theoretical values due to the length fabrication tolerances in bracing tubes, which may in turn influence the seismic performance of braced structures. Based on the working mechanism and hysteretic response of dual-tube SC-BRBs, this paper first analyses the influence mechanism of tube length tolerance on the initial stiffness of the self-centering system. The initial stiffness modification coefficient β is defined, and its calculation is established. Computational models are constructed for 4- and 12-storey steel frame buildings with dual-tube SC-BRBs. Nonlinear dynamic analysis is performed to investigate the influence of different values of β on the seismic response of the structures. The results show that the floor acceleration decreases significantly, except the top floor, with the reduction of β, which is introduced by tube length tolerance. However, the peak storey drift does not increase significantly, especially for 4-storey building. The residual storey drifts under different β are all very small, which indicates that the reduction of β has little influence on the self-centering capacity of the structures.

[1]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces , 2003 .

[2]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Experimental tests on full‐scale RC unretrofitted frame and retrofitted with buckling‐restrained braces , 2012 .

[3]  Richard Sause,et al.  Seismic Performance of Steel Self-Centering, Moment-Resisting Frame: Hybrid Simulations under Design Basis Earthquake , 2013 .

[4]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Design, Testing, and Detailed Component Modeling of a High-Capacity Self-Centering Energy-Dissipative Brace , 2015 .

[5]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Development of nonlinear analytical model and seismic analyses of a steel frame with self-centering devices and viscoelastic dampers , 2011 .

[6]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[7]  Songye Zhu,et al.  Seismic Analysis of Concentrically Braced Frame Systems with Self-Centering Friction Damping Braces , 2008 .

[8]  C. L. Wang,et al.  Development of a novel self-centering buckling-restrained brace with BFRP composite tendons , 2014 .

[9]  A. Elnashai,et al.  Fundamentals of earthquake engineering , 2008 .

[10]  Hyunhoon Choi,et al.  Residual Drift Response of SMRFs and BRB Frames in Steel Buildings Designed according to ASCE 7-05 , 2011 .

[11]  Hoseok Chi,et al.  Seismic behavior of post-tensioned column base for steel self-centering moment resisting frame , 2012 .

[12]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Development of floor slab for steel post-tensioned self-centering moment frames , 2011 .

[13]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Steel braced frames with dual-core SCBs and sandwiched BRBs: Mechanics, modeling and seismic demands , 2014 .

[14]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Innovative strategies for seismic retrofitting of steel and composite structures , 2005 .

[15]  Matthew R. Eatherton,et al.  Development and experimental validation of a nickel–titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace , 2012 .

[16]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Bracing systems for seismic retrofitting of steel frames , 2009 .

[17]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Development of cross-anchored dual-core self-centering braces for seismic resistance , 2014 .

[18]  N. Null Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[19]  Ryota Matsui,et al.  Seismic retrofit design method for RC buildings using buckling-restrained braces and steel frames , 2014 .

[20]  Constantin Christopoulos,et al.  Seismic Response of Multistory Buildings with Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Steel Braces , 2008 .

[21]  Zhen Zhou,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Hysteretic Performance of Dual-Tube Self-Centering Buckling-Restrained Braces with Composite Tendons , 2015 .

[22]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Experimental results of a NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based recentering beam-column connection , 2011 .

[23]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces , 2010 .

[24]  Jeffrey Erochko Improvements to the Design and Use of Post-tensioned Self-centering Energy-dissipative (SCED) Braces , 2013 .

[25]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Bracing System for the Seismic Resistance of Structures: Development and Validation , 2008 .

[26]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Design and analysis of braced frames with shape memory alloy and energy-absorbing hybrid devices , 2010 .