COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient ‐ Reported Outcome Measures ( PROMs ) user manual

[1]  Patrick,et al.  COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments , 2018 .

[2]  L. Mokkink,et al.  Measurement properties of the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ): a study based on Classical Test Theory , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  P. Spuls,et al.  Reporting of symptoms in randomized controlled trials of atopic eczema treatments: a systematic review , 2016, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  Caroline B. Terwee,et al.  How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline , 2016, Trials.

[5]  C. Terwee,et al.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. , 2016, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Measurement Properties of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Systematic Review , 2016, Physical Therapy.

[7]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. , 2015, Contemporary clinical trials.

[8]  Elizabeth Molsen,et al.  Clinical Outcome Assessments: Conceptual Foundation-Report of the ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment - Emerging Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[9]  A. Yoo,et al.  Is Visual Evaluation of Aneurysm Coiling a Reliable Study End Point?: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2015, Stroke.

[10]  P. White,et al.  A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in child and adolescent burn research. , 2015, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[11]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[12]  P. Tugwell,et al.  The OMERACT Handbook , 2014 .

[13]  Caroline B Terwee,et al.  Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) , 2013, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[14]  D. A. Peterson,et al.  Rating scales for musician's dystonia , 2013, Neurology.

[15]  Otto S Hoekstra,et al.  Clinicians are right not to like Cohen’s κ , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Caroline B. Terwee,et al.  Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[17]  Caroline B. Terwee,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide , 2011 .

[18]  C. Terwee,et al.  Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[19]  Kelly M. Clanchy,et al.  Measurement of habitual physical activity performance in adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review , 2011, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[20]  D. Cella,et al.  Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  J. Higgins.  Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[22]  C. Terwee,et al.  The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  C. Terwee,et al.  The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  W. Mechelen,et al.  Physical Activity Questionnaires for Youth , 2010, Sports medicine.

[25]  Jordi Alonso,et al.  The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[26]  E. Waclawski.  Health Measurement Scales—A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use , 2010 .

[27]  C. Terwee,et al.  The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[28]  C. Terwee,et al.  Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[29]  M. Strauss,et al.  Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology. , 2009, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[30]  Michael Koller,et al.  A simulation study provided sample size guidance for differential item functioning (DIF) studies using short scales. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  H. Vet,et al.  Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[32]  S. Reise,et al.  Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS): An item response theory approach. , 2009, Psychology science quarterly.

[33]  W. Revelle,et al.  Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma , 2009 .

[34]  Phil Wood.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2008 .

[35]  M. Edelen,et al.  Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement , 2007, Quality of Life Research.

[36]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[37]  C. Terwee,et al.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[38]  S. Gregorich.  Do Self-Report Instruments Allow Meaningful Comparisons Across Diverse Population Groups?: Testing Measurement Invariance Using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework , 2006, Medical care.

[39]  Gerald van Belle,et al.  Differential Item Functioning Analysis With Ordinal Logistic Regression Techniques: DIFdetect and difwithpar , 2006, Medical care.

[40]  C. Terwee,et al.  Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach , 2006, Quality of Life Research.

[41]  C. Terwee,et al.  When to use agreement versus reliability measures. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[42]  Andrew Smart,et al.  A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. , 2006, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[43]  J. Steiner,et al.  Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 2006 .

[44]  K. Herr,et al.  Tools for assessment of pain in nonverbal older adults with dementia: a state-of-the-science review. , 2006, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[45]  C. McHorney,et al.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[46]  F. Pouwer,et al.  Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36 , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[47]  P. Fayers,et al.  Use of differential item functioning analysis to assess the equivalence of translations of a questionnaire , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[48]  D. Hand,et al.  Causal indicators in quality of life research , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[49]  David L Streiner,et al.  Being Inconsistent About Consistency: When Coefficient Alpha Does and Doesn't Matter , 2003, Journal of personality assessment.

[50]  Ronette L. Kolotkin,et al.  PQP3: DEFINING CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL CHANGE IN HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE , 2001 .

[51]  M. Sprangers,et al.  Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[52]  C Jenkinson,et al.  Development Standards for Health Measures , 1996, Journal of health services research & policy.

[53]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[54]  F. Floyd,et al.  Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. , 1995 .

[55]  D L Streiner,et al.  Figuring Out Factors: The Use and Misuse of Factor Analysis , 1994, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[56]  J. Linacre,et al.  Sample size and item calibration stability , 1994 .

[57]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[58]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[59]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[60]  S. Reise,et al.  Parameter Recovery in the Graded Response Model Using MULTILOG , 1990 .

[61]  G. Norman,et al.  Issues in the use of change scores in randomized trials. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[62]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[63]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  S. Messick.  THE STANDARD PROBLEM: MEANING AND VALUES IN MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION , 1974 .

[65]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[66]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[67]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[68]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .