Seamless Estimation of Hydrometeorological Risk Across Spatial Scales

Hydrometeorological hazards caused losses of approximately 110 billion U.S. Dollars in 2016 worldwide. Current damage estimations do not consider the uncertainties in a comprehensive way, and they are not consistent between spatial scales. Aggregated land use data are used at larger spatial scales, although detailed exposure data at the object level, such as openstreetmap.org, is becoming increasingly available across the globe. We present a probabilistic approach for object-based damage estimation which represents uncertainties and is fully scalable in space. The approach is applied and validated to company damage from the flood of 2013 in Germany. Damage estimates are more accurate compared to damage models using land use data, and the estimation works reliably at all spatial scales. Therefore, it can as well be used for pre-event analysis and risk assessments. This method takes hydrometeorological damage estimation and risk assessments to the next level, making damage estimates and their uncertainties fully scalable in space, from object to country level, and enabling the exploitation of new exposure data.

[1]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Application and validation of FLEMOcs – a flood-loss estimation model for the commercial sector , 2010 .

[2]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood precaution of companies and their ability to cope with the flood in August 2002 in Saxony, Germany , 2007 .

[3]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 1998 .

[4]  Peter Salamon,et al.  Modelling the socio-economic impact of river floods in Europe , 2016 .

[5]  D. I. Smith.  Flood damage estimation - A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions , 1994 .

[6]  Massimiliano Pittore,et al.  Perspectives on global dynamic exposure modelling for geo-risk assessment , 2017, Natural Hazards.

[7]  Dennis Wagenaar,et al.  Multi-variable flood damage modelling with limited data using supervised learning approaches , 2017 .

[8]  C. Field.  Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaption , 2012 .

[9]  Heidi Kreibich,et al.  Multi-model ensembles for assessment of flood losses and associated uncertainty , 2018 .

[10]  F. Pappenberger,et al.  Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis , 2006 .

[11]  Jean-Paul Pinelli,et al.  Hurricane vulnerability modeling: Development and future trends , 2013 .

[12]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Probabilistic, Multivariable Flood Loss Modeling on the Mesoscale with BT‐FLEMO , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Review article "Assessment of economic flood damage" , 2010 .

[14]  H. Winsemius,et al.  A framework for global river flood risk assessments , 2012 .

[15]  Wolfgang Kron,et al.  Flood Risk = Hazard • Values • Vulnerability , 2005 .

[16]  Jason Lin,et al.  HAZUS-MH Hurricane Model Methodology. II: Damage and Loss Estimation , 2006 .

[17]  K. Hornik,et al.  party : A Laboratory for Recursive Partytioning , 2009 .

[18]  Annegret H. Thieken,et al.  Review article: assessing the costs of natural hazards - state of the art and knowledge gaps , 2013 .

[19]  E. Penning-Rowsell,et al.  Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[20]  Bruno Merz,et al.  How useful are complex flood damage models? , 2014 .

[21]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[22]  R. Figueiredo,et al.  Using Open Building Data in the Development of Exposure Datasets for Catastrophe Risk Modelling , 2015 .

[23]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach , 2013 .

[24]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[25]  A. Kumar,et al.  Hell and High Water: Practice-Relevant Adaptation Science , 2013, Science.

[26]  Martin Wild,et al.  Modelling European winter wind storm losses in current and future climate , 2010 .

[27]  Heidi Kreibich,et al.  Costing natural hazards , 2014 .

[28]  D. Rybski,et al.  Damage functions for climate-related hazards: unification and uncertainty analysis , 2015 .

[29]  Brenden Jongman,et al.  Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity , 2013 .

[30]  Heidi Kreibich,et al.  The flood of June 2013 in Germany: how much do we know about its impacts? , 2016 .

[31]  J. M. van Noortwijk,et al.  Uncertainty in flood damage estimation , 2008 .

[32]  Nicolai Meinshausen,et al.  Quantile Regression Forests , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[33]  P. Bates,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models , 2015 .

[34]  Bruno Merz,et al.  What made the June 2013 flood in Germany an exceptional event? A hydro-meteorological evaluation , 2014 .

[35]  Cao Wang,et al.  Assessing hurricane damage costs in the presence of vulnerability model uncertainty , 2017, Natural Hazards.

[36]  Jürgen P. Kropp,et al.  Comparison of storm damage functions and their performance , 2015 .

[37]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Tree‐based flood damage modeling of companies: Damage processes and model performance , 2017 .

[38]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Tree-Based Models for Multi-Variate Flood Damage Assessment in Australia , 2016 .

[39]  R. Müller,et al.  Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences , 2013 .

[40]  Daniel M. Mitchell,et al.  Characterizing loss and damage from climate change , 2014 .

[41]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach , 2012 .

[42]  W. Adger,et al.  Successful adaptation to climate change across scales , 2005 .