Accuracy Enhancement of Anomaly Localization with Participatory Sensing Vehicles

Transportation agencies cannot afford to scale existing methods of roadway and railway condition monitoring to more frequently detect, localize, and fix anomalies throughout networks. Consequently, anomalies such as potholes and cracks develop between maintenance cycles and cause severe vehicle damage and safety issues. The need for a lower-cost and more-scalable solution spurred the idea of using sensors on board vehicles for a continuous and network-wide monitoring approach. However, the timing of the full adoption of connected vehicles is uncertain. Therefore, researchers used smartphones to evaluate a variety of methods to implement the application using regular vehicles. However, the poor accuracy of standard positioning services with low-cost geospatial positioning system (GPS) receivers presents a significant challenge. The experiments conducted in this research found that the error spread can exceed 32 m, and the mean localization error can exceed 27 m at highway speeds. Such large errors can make the application impractical for widespread use. This work used statistical techniques to inform a model that can provide more accurate localization. The proposed method can achieve sub-meter accuracy from participatory vehicle sensors by knowing only the mean GPS update rate, the mean traversal speed, and the mean latency of tagging accelerometer samples with GPS coordinates.

[1]  Maksym Spiryagin,et al.  Onboard Condition Monitoring Sensors, Systems and Techniques for Freight Railway Vehicles: A Review , 2019, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[2]  A. Agresti,et al.  Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences , 1979 .

[3]  Charles F. F. Karney Algorithms for geodesics , 2011, Journal of Geodesy.

[4]  Fan Ye,et al.  Smartphone-Based Real Time Vehicle Tracking in Indoor Parking Structures , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[5]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[6]  Amir Hossein Alavi,et al.  An overview of smartphone technology for citizen-centered, real-time and scalable civil infrastructure monitoring , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[7]  Bhavana Bhardwaj,et al.  Railroad Track Condition Monitoring Using Inertial Sensors and Digital Signal Processing: A Review , 2019, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[8]  Matt Smith,et al.  Pavement Condition Monitoring with Crowdsourced Connected Vehicle Data , 2014 .

[9]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  Towards a Practical Crowdsensing System for Road Surface Conditions Monitoring , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[10]  Synthesis Program,et al.  Automated Pavement Condition Surveys , 2019 .

[11]  Rui Calçada,et al.  Smartphone’s Sensing Capabilities for On-Board Railway Track Monitoring: Structural Performance and Geometrical Degradation Assessment , 2019, Advances in Civil Engineering.

[12]  Maria Rosaria De Blasiis,et al.  Pavement Distress Detection Methods: A Review , 2018, Infrastructures.

[13]  Han Wu,et al.  Precise Localization and Formation Control of Swarm Robots via Wireless Sensor Networks , 2014 .

[14]  Steven M Karamihas,et al.  Measuring, Characterizing, and Reporting Pavement Roughness of Low-Speed and Urban Roads , 2019 .

[15]  Abiodun Musa Aibinu,et al.  A Survey of Accelerometer-Based Techniques for Road Anomalies Detection and Characterization , 2019 .

[16]  Denver Tolliver,et al.  Enhancement of signals from connected vehicles to detect roadway and railway anomalies , 2020 .

[17]  Vinicius F. S. Mota,et al.  A participatory sensing framework to classify road surface quality , 2019, Journal of Internet Services and Applications.

[18]  Yuchuan Du,et al.  Measurement of International Roughness Index by Using -Axis Accelerometers and GPS , 2014 .

[19]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Smart City Infrastructure , 2019 .

[20]  Rodrigo Nicoletti,et al.  Pavement Roughness Evaluation with Smartphones , 2018 .

[21]  Richard C. Sprinthall Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences , 2008 .

[22]  Peter Múčka,et al.  International Roughness Index specifications around the world , 2017 .

[23]  Raj Bridgelall,et al.  Connected Vehicle Approach for Pavement Roughness Evaluation , 2014 .

[24]  Songnian Li,et al.  Road Surface Monitoring Using Smartphone Sensors: A Review , 2018, Sensors.

[25]  Denver Tolliver,et al.  Intelligent Transportation Systems Approach to Railroad Infrastructure Performance Evaluation: Track Surface Abnormality Identification with Smartphone-Based App , 2019 .

[26]  Stephen J Mooney,et al.  Quantifying Distance Overestimation From Global Positioning System in Urban Spaces. , 2016, American journal of public health.

[27]  Yiik Diew Wong,et al.  Response-based methods to measure road surface irregularity: a state-of-the-art review , 2019, European Transport Research Review.