Tertiary teachers and student evaluations: never the twain shall meet?

Internationally, centralised systems of student evaluation have become normative practice in higher education institutions, providing data for monitoring teaching quality and for teacher professional development. While extensive research has been done on student evaluations, there is less research-based evidence about teachers’ perceptions of and engagement with student evaluations, the focus of the research reported in this paper. An interpretive approach framed the study in which data were gathered through questionnaire and interview responses from teaching staff at three New Zealand tertiary institutions. Results highlighted the general acceptance of the notion of student evaluations, recurring ideas about the limitations of evaluations and significant gaps in the way academics engage with student evaluation feedback. Recommendations for enhancing teacher engagement with student evaluation are made to optimise the potential for student evaluations to inform teaching development and to improve students’ learning experiences.

[1]  Michael J. Bennett,et al.  The Historical Background , 1997 .

[2]  Linet Arthur From performativity to professionalism: lecturers’ responses to student feedback , 2009 .

[3]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Doing course evaluation as if learning matters most , 2008 .

[4]  William E. Cashin,et al.  Student Ratings of Teaching : A Summary of Research and Literature , 2012 .

[5]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Research on College Teaching: The Historical Background. , 1990 .

[6]  Tanya N. Beran,et al.  What’s the “Use” of Student Ratings of Instruction for Administrators? One University’s Experience , 2007 .

[7]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[8]  G. Hendry,et al.  Teachers' approaches to teaching and responses to student evaluation in a problem‐based medical program , 2007 .

[9]  S. Moore,et al.  Students evaluating teachers: exploring the importance of faculty reaction to feedback on teaching , 2005 .

[10]  Peter Burden,et al.  Does the use of end of semester evaluation forms represent teachers’ views of teaching in a tertiary education context in Japan? , 2008 .

[11]  F. Erickson Qualitative Research Methods for Science Education , 2012 .

[12]  John A. Vernon,et al.  “WHAT'S WHAT.” , 1902 .

[13]  P. Abrami,et al.  Navigating student ratings of instruction. , 1997 .

[14]  Tanya N. Beran,et al.  Instructors’ perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction , 2009 .

[15]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Beyond Student Evaluation of Teaching: Identifying and addressing academic staff development needs , 2000 .

[16]  Lawrence M. Aleamoni,et al.  Student Ratings of Instruction , 1981 .

[17]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Research on College Teaching. , 1972 .

[18]  Catherine Bovill,et al.  Sharing responsibility for learning through formative evaluation: moving to evaluation as learning , 2011 .

[19]  Calvin Smith Building effectiveness in teaching through targeted evaluation and response: connecting evaluation to teaching improvement in higher education , 2008 .

[20]  R. Menges,et al.  Key resources on teaching, learning, curriculum, and faculty development : a guide to the higher education literature , 1988 .

[21]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[22]  Jane F. Dye,et al.  Constant Comparison Method: A Kaleidoscope of Data , 2000 .

[23]  R. Coe,et al.  Effectiveness of Consultation on Student Ratings Feedback: A Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[24]  L. Schmelkin,et al.  Faculty Perspectives on Course and Teacher Evaluations , 1997 .

[25]  Fadia Nasser,et al.  Faculty Views of Student Evaluation of College Teaching , 2002 .

[26]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Student Ratings of Instruction , 1974 .

[27]  J. C. Ory,et al.  Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance , 1994 .

[28]  D. Kember,et al.  Does the Use of Student Feedback Questionnaires Improve the Overall Quality of Teaching? , 2002 .