Realizing energy infrastructure projects – A qualitative empirical analysis of local practices to address social acceptance

The federal state of Upper Austria, at a crossing point for European energy grids, provides large-scale resources for storage of natural gas and is among the top infrastructures in this regard in Europe. Considering the ambitious plans for enhancements of energy infrastructures in this region, the issue of social acceptance of energy infrastructure is crucial. To foster an understanding of the challenges inherent in this issue we present an analysis concentrating on the social acceptance of energy infrastructure projects in Upper Austria. This paper addresses the issues with realizing energy infrastructure projects and analyzes the problems and benefits based on an empirical–qualitative study comprising expert interviews, discussions with stakeholders, and a round table workshop integrating the disparate viewpoints. The aim of the process was to integrate different attitudes, perspectives and positions of relevant stakeholders, members of citizens’ initiatives, environmental organizations and of the national government and local authorities. The results presented are based on both the analysis of the empirical–qualitative data and the existing studies and literature on social acceptance. The qualitative research compares experiences and current practices with social acceptance issues (like frameworks, participation, communication strategies) in a set of considered energy infrastructure projects.

[1]  A. Jobert,et al.  Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies , 2007 .

[2]  Peter Radgen,et al.  Stakeholder acceptance of carbon capture and storage in Germany , 2009 .

[3]  D. Horst.  NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[4]  Friedrich Schneider,et al.  The value of supply security: The costs of power outages to Austrian households, firms and the public sector , 2013 .

[5]  U. Flick.  An Introduction to Qualitative Research , 1998 .

[6]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  The role of dialogue in fostering acceptance of transmission lines: the case of a France–Spain interconnection project , 2013 .

[7]  Klaus Moeltner,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Local Opposition to New Transmission Lines Across the EU-27 , 2016 .

[8]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[9]  J. Cohen,et al.  Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review , 2014 .

[10]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[11]  M. Wolsink.  The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources , 2012 .

[12]  O. Kuik,et al.  Local acceptance of renewable energy - A case study from southeast Germany , 2011 .

[13]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Explaining “NIMBY” Objections to a Power Line , 2013 .

[14]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[15]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[16]  Bjarne Steffen,et al.  Prospects for Pumped‐Hydro Storage in Germany , 2012 .

[17]  I. Reinhardt,et al.  Akzeptanz durch Beteiligung , 2015 .

[18]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[19]  M. Pasqualetti.  Opposing Wind Energy Landscapes: A Search for Common Cause , 2011 .

[20]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Explaining public preferences for high voltage pylon designs: An empirical study of perceived fit in a rural landscape , 2013 .

[21]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Reconsidering Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: a Critical Review , 2007 .

[22]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Public beliefs about high-voltage powerlines in Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom: A comparative survey , 2014 .

[23]  Dominik Möst,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage on its way to large-scale deployment: Social acceptance and willingness to pay in Germany , 2012 .

[24]  B. Wee,et al.  Hydrogen fuel station acceptance: A structural equation model based on the technology acceptance framework , 2014 .

[25]  Kate Burningham,et al.  The limitations of the NIMBY concept for understanding public engagement with renewable energy technologies: a literature review , 2006 .

[26]  Eija Pouta,et al.  Local residents’ perceptions of energy landscape: the case of transmission lines , 2011 .

[27]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature , 2010 .

[28]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Energy sustainable communities : Environmental psychological investigations , 2008 .

[29]  J. Cohen,et al.  The effects of network regulation on electricity supply security: a European analysis , 2015 .

[30]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Distributed generation of sustainable energy as a common pool resource: social acceptance in rural setting of smart (micro-)grid configurations , 2014 .

[31]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. , 2010 .