Kinesthetic and visual control of a bimanual task: specification of direction and amplitude

Kinesthetic information about a perturbation can quickly modify motor activity by producing reflexive compensation. The purpose of the present study was to determine how quickly kinesthetic information about target movement can modify motor activity. Visual information about target movement is known to guide motor activity both quickly and accurately. Therefore, we compared the speed and accuracy of responses to kinesthetically and visually presented targets. Human subjects produced changes in elbow torque as quickly and accurately as possible after the random presentation of 1 of 8 target torques. Information about the direction and amplitude of the target torque was provided either kinesthetically or visually. Responses to kinesthetic targets started at an average latency of 150 msec, and after an additional 159 msec, these responses became accurately graded according to target amplitude. Responses to visual targets started at an average latency of 250 msec, and after an additional 208 msec, these responses became accurately graded according to target amplitude. The accuracy of responses to kinesthetic targets was very similar to the accuracy of responses to visual targets. We conclude that the neural processing of kinesthetic information about target movement is sufficiently fast and accurate to guide typical motor activities.

[1]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[2]  C. Marsden,et al.  Servo action in the human thumb. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  R. Klein.  Attention and visual dominance: a chronometric analysis. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[5]  P. Hammond,et al.  Involuntary activity in biceps following the sudden application of velocity to the abducted forearm. , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. Houk,et al.  Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Hyman.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Abbs,et al.  Control of complex motor gestures: orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  B L Day,et al.  Accurate repositioning of the human thumb against unpredictable dynamic loads is dependent upon peripheral feed‐back , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  M. Flanders,et al.  Quantification of peripherally induced reciprocal activation during voluntary muscle contraction. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of a rapid grasp. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Flanders,et al.  Interaction between visually and kinesthetically triggered voluntary responses. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  P. Cordo.  Mechanisms controlling accurate changes in elbow torque in humans , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Chernikoff,et al.  Reaction time to kinesthetic stimulation resulting from sudden arm displacement. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.