Changes in Species Traits during Succession: A Search for Pattern

Cover data from 13 successional seres starting on bare ground in the western part of the Czech Republic were analysed. The following questions were addressed: (1) whether the participation of species with particular traits exhibits some trends, and (2) whether primary and secondary seres differ from each other in the course of the first 10 yr of succession. Primary seres were distinguished from secondary ones a priori on the basis of absence or presence of (a) organic topsoil, and (b) soil seed bank at the onset of succession. Traits important for the course of succession were considered, their relative importance expressed for each sere and year on the basis of species quantities, and tested for trends (increase, decrease, unimodal response, no evident trend or absence). The majority of traits considered exhibited some trends in the course of succession. Participation of C-strategists, phanerophytes, intensity of lateral spread, presence of VA mycorrhizae, dispersal by animals and wind, and height of plants significantly increased during the first 10 yr of succession, whereas the participation of R-strategists, therophytes, propagule weight, and capability of forming persistent seed bank decreased. Participation of S-strategists, geophytes, hemicryptophytes, and all relevant types of pollination did not exhibit any significant trend. Primary and secondary seres differed from each other neither in trends in life-history characteristics of constituent species nor in their relative importance after the first 10 yr of succession.

[1]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  On the rate of succession , 1993 .

[2]  David Tilman,et al.  Allocation and the transient dynamics of succession on poor soils. , 1990 .

[3]  M. Fenner.  Seed characteristics in relation to succession , 1987 .

[4]  V. Brown.  Plant succession and life history strategy. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  John L. Harper,et al.  The Shapes and Sizes of Seeds , 1970 .

[6]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn. , 1990 .

[7]  D. Tilman,et al.  Old‐Field Succession on a Minnesota Sand Plain , 1987 .

[8]  Jan Lepš,et al.  Succession in Abandoned Fields , 1990, Geobotany.

[9]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[10]  V. D. Valk,et al.  Establishment, colonization and persistence , 1992 .

[11]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species , 1989 .

[12]  M. Allen,et al.  The mediation of competition by mycorrhizae in successional and patchy environments. , 1990 .

[13]  I. Noble,et al.  The Use of Vital Attributes to Predict Successional Changes in Plant Communities Subject to Recurrent Disturbances , 1980 .

[14]  A. Grootjans,et al.  Mechanisms of vegetation succession: a review of concepts and perspectives , 1993 .

[15]  H. Rydin,et al.  Plant Characteristics Over a Century of Primary Sucession on Islands: Lake Hjalmaren , 1991 .

[16]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[17]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Spontaneous Establishment of Woody Plants in Central European Derelict Sites and their Potential for Reclamation , 1994 .

[18]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[19]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Succession: Life History and Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.