Numerical sensitivity analysis for aerodynamic optimization: A survey of approaches

[1]  Philipp Scholl,et al.  Adaptivity , 2011, IATEL - Interdisciplinary Approaches to Technology-enhanced Learning.

[2]  R. Dwight,et al.  Efficient and robust algorithms for solution of the adjoint compressible Navier–Stokes equations with applications , 2009 .

[3]  Zhonghua Han,et al.  Efficient Uncertainty Quantification using Gradient-Enhanced Kriging , 2009 .

[4]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Unsteady Discrete Adjoint Formulation for Two-Dimensional Flow Problems with Deforming Meshes , 2008 .

[5]  Richard P. Dwight,et al.  Adjoint Algorithms for the Optimization of 3d Turbulent Configurations , 2007 .

[6]  Enrique Zuazua,et al.  Systematic Continuous Adjoint Approach to Viscous Aerodynamic Design on Unstructured Grids , 2007 .

[7]  O. Amoignon,et al.  Mesh Deformation using Radial Basis Functions for Gradient-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2007 .

[8]  Markus Widhalm,et al.  Comparison between Gradient-free and Adjoint Based Aerodynamic Optimization of a Flying Wing Transport Aircraft in the Preliminary Design. , 2007 .

[9]  J. Peter,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for the RANS Equations Coupled with Linearized Turbulence Model , 2007 .

[10]  M. Giles,et al.  Efficient Hessian Calculation Using Automatic Differentiation , 2007 .

[11]  D. Mavriplis.  Discrete Adjoint-Based Approach for Optimization Problems on Three-Dimensional Unstructured Meshes , 2007 .

[12]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Multi-point Aero-Structural Optimization of Wings Including Planform Variations , 2007 .

[13]  Luis Santos,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization using the adjoint method , 2007 .

[14]  G. Carrier,et al.  Aerodynamic and Structural Optimisation of Powerplant Integration under the Wing of a Transonic Transport Aircraft , 2007 .

[15]  R. Dwight,et al.  Effect of Approximations of the Discrete Adjoint on Gradient-Based Optimization , 2006 .

[16]  Arno Ronzheimer,et al.  Development and Application of a Flexible and Efficient Environment for Aerodynamic Shape Optimisation , 2006 .

[17]  Giovanni Mengali,et al.  A hybrid genetic based optimization procedure for aircraft conceptual analysis , 2006 .

[18]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Stabilizing Linear Harmonic Flow Solvers for Turbomachinery Aeroelasicity with Complex Interative Algorithms , 2006 .

[19]  Richard P. Dwight,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Solution of the Adjoint Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations with Applications , 2006 .

[20]  D. Mavriplis.  Multigrid Solution of the Discrete Adjoint for Optimization Problems on Unstructured Meshes , 2006 .

[21]  Chi-Tuân Pham.  Linéarisation du flux visqueux des équations de navier-stokes et de modèles de turbulence pour l'optimisation aérodynamique en turbomachines , 2006 .

[22]  R. Dwight.  Efficiency Improvements of RANS-Based Analysis and Optimization using Implicit and Adjoint Methods on Unstructured Grids , 2006 .

[23]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Derivation of an adjoint consistent discontinuous Galerkin discretization of the compressible Euler equations , 2006 .

[24]  Antonio Fazzolari,et al.  An Aero-Structure Adjoint Formulation for Efficient Multidisciplinary Wing Optimization , 2005 .

[25]  Richard P. Dwight,et al.  Discrete Adjoint of the Navier-Stokes Equations for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2005 .

[26]  Vincent Kelner,et al.  MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION OF A FAN BLADE BY COUPLING A GENETIC ALGORITHM AND A PARAMETRIC FLOW SOLVER , 2005 .

[27]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Multi-point Wing Planform Optimization via Control Theory , 2005 .

[28]  Jochen Wild,et al.  Evaluation of Different Optimization Strategies for the Design of a High-Lift Flap Device , 2005 .

[29]  E. Nielsen,et al.  Using an Adjoint Approach to Eliminate Mesh Sensitivities in Computational Design , 2005 .

[30]  Christian H. Bischof,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Turbulence Models Using Automatic Differentiation , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[31]  Joel Brezillon,et al.  2D and 3D aerodynamic shape optimisation using the adjoint approach , 2004 .

[32]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  An adjoint‐based design methodology for CFD problems , 2004 .

[33]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Stabilization of linear flow solver for turbomachinery aeroelasticity using Recursive Projection method , 2004 .

[34]  O. Pironneau,et al.  SHAPE OPTIMIZATION IN FLUID MECHANICS , 2004 .

[35]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Complete Aircraft Configurations using Unstructured Grids , 2004 .

[36]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aero-Structural Wing Planform Optimization , 2004 .

[37]  M. Meaux,et al.  VISCOUS AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION BASED ON THE DISCRETE ADJOINT STATE FOR 3D INDUSTRIAL CONFIGURATIONS , 2004 .

[38]  Oh-Hyun Rho,et al.  Feasibility Study of Constant Eddy-Viscosity Assumption in Gradient-Based Design Optimization , 2003 .

[39]  O. Pironneau.  Shape Sensitivity and Design for Fluids with Shocks , 2003 .

[40]  M. Sergio Campobasso,et al.  Adjoint Calculation of Sensitivities of Turbomachinery Objective Functions , 2003 .

[41]  M. Giles,et al.  Algorithm Developments for Discrete Adjoint Methods , 2003 .

[42]  David L. Darmofal,et al.  An Exact Dual Adjoint Solution Method for Turbulent Flows on Unstructured Grids , 2003 .

[43]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method , 2003 .

[44]  Alan Le Moigne,et al.  A discrete Navier-Stokes adjoint method for aerodynamic optimisation of Blended Wing-Body configurations , 2002 .

[45]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  The harmonic adjoint approach to unsteady turbomachinery design , 2002 .

[46]  Stephane Etienne,et al.  Reliable Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Via and Adaptive Sensitivity Equation Method , 2002 .

[47]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  High-Fidelity Aerostructural Design Optimization of a Supersonic Business Jet , 2002 .

[48]  O. Rho,et al.  Effects of Constant Turbulent Eddy Viscosity Assumption on Gradient- Based Design Optimization , 2002 .

[49]  Andreas Griewank,et al.  Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms: From Simulation to Optimization , 2000, Springer New York.

[50]  V. Valentin.  Optimisation aérodynamique 3-D des aubages dans les turbomachines axiales multi-étages , 2002 .

[51]  D. Zingg,et al.  Newton-Krylov Algorithm for Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier-Stokes Equations , 2002 .

[52]  Marian Nemec,et al.  Towards efficient aerodynamic shape optimization based on the Navier-Stokes equations , 2001 .

[53]  M. Giles,et al.  Adjoint Code Developments Using the Exact Discrete Approach , 2001 .

[54]  S. Agrawal,et al.  Development and application of TLNS3D-adjoint - A practical tool for aerodynamic shape optimization , 2001 .

[55]  A. Jameson,et al.  STUDIES OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACHES TO VISCOUS AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION , 2001 .

[56]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Flap-Deflection Optimization for Transonic Cruise Performance Improvement of Supersonic Transport Wing , 2001 .

[57]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Analytic adjoint solutions for the quasi-one-dimensional Euler equations , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[58]  Dominique Pelletier,et al.  Adaptivity, sensitivity and uncertainty - Towards standards in CFD , 2001 .

[59]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Recent improvements in aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes , 2001 .

[60]  C. Farhat,et al.  Coupled Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Aeroelastic Systems , 2001 .

[61]  Oh-Hyun Rho,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for the Navier-Stokes Equations with Two-Equation Turbulence Models , 2001 .

[62]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Navier-Stokes Equations on Unstructured Meshes Using Complex Variables , 2001 .

[63]  Perry A. Newman,et al.  Some Advanced Concepts in Discrete Aerodynamic Sensitivity Analysis , 2001 .

[64]  Niles A. Pierce,et al.  An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design , 2000 .

[65]  M. Giles.  On the iterative solution of adjoint equations , 2000 .

[66]  Erik Lund,et al.  Shape Sensitivity Analysis of Strongly Coupled Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems , 2000 .

[67]  Gene Hou,et al.  Analytical sensitivity analysis of a static aeroelastic wing , 2000 .

[68]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  On the use of Runge-Kutta time-marching and multigrid for the solution of steady adjoint equations , 2000 .

[69]  김종암,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for the Navier-Stokes Equations with Two-Equation Turbulence Models , 2000 .

[70]  J. Essers,et al.  An Optimal Control Theory Based Algorithm to Solve 2D Aerodynamic Shape Optimisation Problems for Inviscid and Viscous Flows , 2000 .

[71]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Optimization of aeroelastic systems using coupled analytical sensitivities , 2000 .

[72]  Andreas Griewank,et al.  Evaluating derivatives - principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation, Second Edition , 2000, Frontiers in applied mathematics.

[73]  B. Mohammadi,et al.  Dynamical approaches and incomplete gradients for shape optimization and flow control , 1999 .

[74]  S. Hiernaux,et al.  Aerodynamic optimization using Navier-Stokes equations and optimal control theory , 1999 .

[75]  Max Gunzburger,et al.  SENSITIVITIES, ADJOINTS AND FLOW OPTIMIZATION , 1999 .

[76]  Bijan Mohammadi,et al.  Flow control and shape optimization in aeroelastic configurations , 1999 .

[77]  G. Medic,et al.  3D optimal shape design for complex flows - Application to turbomachinery , 1999 .

[78]  Oh-Hyun Rho,et al.  AERODYNAMIC SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS , 1999 .

[79]  Jamshid A. Samareh,et al.  Status and Future of Geometry Modeling and Grid Generation for Design and Optimization , 1999 .

[80]  Gene Hou,et al.  Overview of Sensitivity Analysis and Shape Optimization for Complex Aerodynamic Configurations , 1999 .

[81]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Airfoil Design on Unstructured Grids for Turbulent Flows , 1999 .

[82]  E. Nielsen,et al.  Aerodynamic design sensitivities on an unstructured mesh using the Navier-Stokes equations and a discrete adjoint formulation , 1998 .

[83]  J. Eric,et al.  Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Meshes Using the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1998 .

[84]  Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al.  Progress Toward Using Sensitivity Derivatives in a High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Analysis of a Supersonic Transport , 1998 .

[85]  A. Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization techniques based on control theory , 1998 .

[86]  A. Jameson,et al.  Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier–Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[87]  Omar Ghattas,et al.  Domain Decomposition Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of a Nonlinear Aeroelasticity Problem , 1998 .

[88]  Bambang Soemarwoto,et al.  The Variational Method for Aerodynamic Optimization Using the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[89]  Alain Dervieux,et al.  Multilevel parametrization for aerodynamical optimization of 3D shapes , 1997 .

[90]  B. Mohammadi.  a New Optimal Shape Design Procedure for Inviscid and Viscous Turbulent Flows , 1997 .

[91]  Christian Bischof,et al.  The ADIFOR 2.0 system for the automatic differentiation of Fortran 77 programs , 1997 .

[92]  M. Hafez,et al.  Optimum Shape Design Using Adjoint Equations for Compressible Flows with Shock Waves , 1997 .

[93]  M. Giles,et al.  Adjoint equations in CFD: duality, boundary conditions and solution behaviour , 1997 .

[94]  A. Taylor,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Sensitivity Analysis and Design Optimization of Complex Configurations Using Unstructured Grids , 1997 .

[95]  L Bonhaus Daryl,et al.  Aerodynamic Design on Unstructured Grids for Turbulent , 1997 .

[96]  T. Gerhold,et al.  Calculation of Complex Three-Dimensional Configurations Employing the DLR-tau-Code , 1997 .

[97]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Re-engineering the design process through computation , 1997 .

[98]  M. J. Rimlinger,et al.  Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computers , 1997 .

[99]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation , 1997 .

[100]  Gene Hou,et al.  First- and Second-Order Aerodynamic Sensitivity Derivatives via Automatic Differentiation with Incremental Iterative Methods , 1996 .

[101]  M. Heinkenschloss,et al.  On the optimality system for a 1-D Euler flow problem , 1996 .

[102]  Arthur C. Taylor,et al.  Three-dimensional aerodynamic shape sensitivity analysis and design optimization using the Euler equations on unstructured grids , 1996 .

[103]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[104]  C. Farhat,et al.  Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: Three‐field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution , 1995 .

[105]  Sean Wakayama,et al.  Lifting surface design using multidisciplinary optimization , 1995 .

[106]  C I James Newman,et al.  An unstructured grid approach to sensitivity analysis and shape optimization using the Euler equations , 1995 .

[107]  Arthur C. Taylor,et al.  Transonic turbulent airfoil design optimization with automatic differentiation in incremental iterative forms , 1995 .

[108]  Manuel D. Salas,et al.  Contribution to the Optimal Shape Design of Two-Dimensional Internal Flows with Embedded Shocks , 1995 .

[109]  A. Jameson.  Optimum aerodynamic design via boundary control , 1994 .

[110]  P. G. Coen,et al.  Supersonic transport wing minimum weight design integrating aerodynamics and structures , 1994 .

[111]  Mohamed Masmoudi,et al.  Computation of high order derivatives in optimal shape design , 1994 .

[112]  B. Christianson.  Reverse accumulation and attractive fixed points , 1994 .

[113]  Alain Dervieux,et al.  A hierarchical approach for shape optimization , 1994 .

[114]  Manuel D. Salas,et al.  SHAPE OPTIMIZATION GOVERNED BY THE EULER EQUATIONS USING AN ADJOINT METHOD , 1993 .

[115]  Gautam M. Shroff,et al.  You have printed the following article : Stabilization of Unstable Procedures : The Recursive Projection Method , 2007 .

[116]  J. O. Hager,et al.  Design efficiency evaluation for transonic airfoil optimization - A case for Navier-Stokes design , 1993 .

[117]  A. Dervieux,et al.  Exact-gradient shape optimization of a 2-D Euler flow , 1992 .

[118]  George S. Dulikravich,et al.  Aerodynamic shape design and optimization - Status and trends , 1992 .

[119]  P. A. Newman,et al.  An Approximately Factored Incremental Strategy for Calculating Consistent Discrete Aerodynamic Sensitivity Derivatives , 1992 .

[120]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Flow analysis and design optimization methods for nozzle afterbody of a hypersonic vehicle , 1992 .

[121]  F. Beux,et al.  Multilevel optimization : application to shape optimum design with a one-shot method , 1992 .

[122]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Practical design optimization of wing/body configurations using the Euler equations , 1992 .

[123]  G. R. Shubin,et al.  A comparison of optimization-based approaches for a model computational aerodynamics design problem , 1992 .

[124]  O. Baysal,et al.  Aerodynamic Sensitivity Analysis Methods for the Compressible Euler Equations , 1991 .

[125]  G. Burgreen,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using Sensitivity Analysis on Third-Order Euler Equations , 1991 .

[126]  V. Korivi,et al.  Sensitivity analysis applied to the Euler equations - A feasibility study with emphasis on variation of geometric shape , 1991 .

[127]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization using sensitivity analysis and computational fluid dynamics , 1991 .

[128]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Helicopter vibration reduction using structural optimization with aeroelastic/multidisciplinary constraints - A survey , 1991 .

[129]  R. Temam,et al.  On some control problems in fluid mechanics , 1990 .

[130]  L. Sirovich,et al.  Constructing a continuous parameter range of computational flows , 1989 .

[131]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Structural optimization of lifting surfaces with divergence and control reversal constraints , 1989 .

[132]  Models R. Alexander.  Sensitivity in Complex , 1989 .

[133]  H. Elbanna,et al.  Determination of aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients in the transonic and supersonic regimes , 1989 .

[134]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[135]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanskisobieski,et al.  On the sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems , 1988 .

[136]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  The case for aerodynamic sensitivity analysis , 1987 .

[137]  Y. Saad,et al.  GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems , 1986 .

[138]  J. Reneaux,et al.  The use of numerical optimization for airfoil design , 1985 .

[139]  R. Haftka.  Sensitivity calculations for iteratively solved problems , 1985 .

[140]  William H. Mason,et al.  Smart aerodynamic optimization , 1983 .

[141]  J. D. Hawk,et al.  Subsonic Panel Method for Designing Wing Surfaces From Pressure Distribution , 1983 .

[142]  J. D. Hawk,et al.  Subsonic panel method for the efficient analysis of multiple geometry perturbations , 1982 .

[143]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Wing Design by Numerical Optimization , 1977 .

[144]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Numerical Airfoil Optimization Using a Reduced Number of Design Coordinates , 1976 .

[145]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  An assessment of airfoil design by numerical optimization , 1974 .

[146]  O. Pironneau.  On optimum design in fluid mechanics , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[147]  O. Pironneau.  On optimum profiles in Stokes flow , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[148]  G. Golub,et al.  Gmres: a Generalized Minimum Residual Algorithm for Solving , 2022 .

[149]  C. Bardos.  Derivatives and Control in the Presence of Shocks , 2022 .